vsversusfinder

Sigma 17- vs Tamron 70-

Updated July 2026 — Sigma 17- wins on aperture and build, Tamron 70- wins on weight and length.

The Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC excels in low-light performance and image quality, while the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD offers great versatility at a lower price.

Why Sigma 17- is better

Aperture

Sigma has a constant F1.8 aperture for low-light shooting.

Image Quality

Sigma's Art series optics provide superior sharpness.

Build Quality

Sigma is part of the premium Art series with exceptional build.

Why Tamron 70- is better

Price

Tamron is significantly cheaper at $399.

Weight

Tamron is lighter at 19.2 oz.

Zoom Range

Tamron offers a versatile 70-300mm focal length.

Overall score

Sigma 17-
85
Tamron 70-
75

Specifications

SpecSigma 17-Tamron 70-
Focal Length17-40mm70-300mm
ApertureF1.8F4.5-6.3
Image StabilizationNoNo
AutofocusStandardRXD
Moisture ResistanceNoYes

Dimension comparison

Sigma 17-Tamron 70-

Overview of the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC and Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD

The Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC and the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD cater to different photography needs and styles. The Sigma lens, priced at $919.00, offers a constant bright aperture, ideal for low-light situations and creative depth effects. In contrast, the Tamron lens is priced at $399.00, making it about 57% cheaper, and focuses on versatility with its telephoto capabilities. This comparison will delve into their features, target users, and overall value.

Design and Build Quality

The Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC is part of Sigma’s Art series, which means it emphasizes exceptional optical performance and build quality. It is designed for Sony E-mount APS-C cameras, making it an excellent choice for photographers interested in portraits and travel photography. The lens is crafted to deliver sharp detail and professional image quality.

On the other hand, the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD is noted for its lightweight and portable design. Weighing just 19.2 oz and measuring 5.8 inches in length, it's one of the smallest and lightest telephoto lenses available, making it ideal for photographers on the go. The moisture-resistant construction also adds to its durability, ensuring it can withstand various shooting conditions.

Optical Performance

When it comes to optical performance, the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC shines with its bright F1.8 constant aperture. This feature allows for greater control over depth of field and exceptional performance in low-light conditions. The Art-series optics provide sharp detail, making it suitable for professional-quality images.

In contrast, the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD features 15 elements arranged in 10 groups, designed to minimize chromatic aberration and other optical issues typical of telephoto lenses. This lens excels in delivering uncompromising image quality, particularly for landscapes and wildlife photography, where detail and clarity are paramount.

Target Audience

The Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC is primarily aimed at photographers who require versatility in focal length while maintaining a bright aperture for various shooting environments. It is particularly suited for those who engage in portraiture, travel, and video work, where depth of field and image quality are crucial.

Conversely, the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD is designed for a broader audience, including hobbyists and professionals alike who seek telephoto capabilities without the bulk. Its versatility makes it suitable for capturing sports, wildlife, and portrait shots, providing a focal length equivalent of 105-450mm on APS-C cameras.

Price Comparison

The Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC is priced at $919.00, while the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD comes in at $399.00, making it about 57% cheaper. This significant price difference may influence the decision for many photographers, particularly those on a budget or those seeking a versatile lens without a hefty investment. The Tamron lens offers excellent value for its price, appealing to those who desire a quality telephoto lens without breaking the bank.

Versatility in Shooting Scenarios

The Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC excels in situations requiring a wide-angle perspective, such as landscape photography or videography, where a bright aperture can enhance the final result. Its ability to produce stunning images in low light gives it an edge for indoor and evening events.

On the other hand, the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD showcases versatility through its extensive zoom range. It can be effectively used for various photography styles, including nature, sports, and casual portraiture. Its compact size further enhances its usability for handheld shooting, which is essential in fast-paced environments.

Autofocus and Usability

The Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC is designed for ease of use, particularly for those who require quick adjustments while shooting. The lens features optics tailored to deliver sharp images consistently, which is critical for both professional and serious amateur photographers.

Meanwhile, the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD incorporates a Rapid eXtra-silent stepping Drive (RXD) autofocus system, known for its speed and quiet operation. This feature is particularly beneficial for wildlife and sports photographers who need to remain unobtrusive while capturing fast-moving subjects.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC and the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD ultimately depends on your photography needs and budget. If you prioritize low-light performance and a constant aperture for creative depth effects, the Sigma lens is the superior choice, despite its higher price. However, if you're looking for a versatile and affordable telephoto lens that offers exceptional value for various photography styles, the Tamron lens, at $399.00, is hard to beat.