vsversusfinder

Sparkle Computer Sparkle Intel Arc A310 ECO, vs ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX

Updated April 2026 — Sparkle Computer Sparkle Intel Arc A310 ECO, wins on thermals and build, ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX wins on ports and memory.

ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC Graphics Card | Single Slot ITX | 2250 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | DisplayPort 2.0 | HDMI 2.0b | 0dB Cooling | 8K Support | 500W | DirectX 12 Ultimate | PCle 4.0$139.99

ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX 6GB OC Graphics Card | Single Slot ITX | 2250 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | DisplayPort 2.0 | HDMI 2.0b | 0dB Cooling | 8K Support | 500W | DirectX 12 Ultimate | PCle 4.0

ASRock

Winner
Sparkle Intel Arc A310 ECO, 4GB GDDR6, 50W TBP, Short Bracket is Included, Low-Profile, Single Fan, Single Slot, HDMI x1, Mini DisplayPort x2, SA310C-4G$139.99

Sparkle Intel Arc A310 ECO, 4GB GDDR6, 50W TBP, Short Bracket is Included, Low-Profile, Single Fan, Single Slot, HDMI x1, Mini DisplayPort x2, SA310C-4G

Sparkle Computer

The ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX edges out the Sparkle Intel Arc A310 ECO due to more clearly defined specifications regarding memory, connectivity, and power design. While both cards share the same price point of $139.99, Product B provides explicit details on its 4GB GDDR6 memory and port configuration, offering greater transparency for system builders. Product A focuses heavily on cooling aesthetics but lacks specific technical data in the provided information.

Why Sparkle Computer Sparkle Intel Arc A310 ECO, is better

Advanced Fan Blade Structure

Features Striped Axial Fan with polishing surface on bottom side

Cooling Optimization

Design optimized for strong cooling performance to keep system cool

User Experience Focus

Explicitly described as easy to use with streamlined design

Why ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX is better

Defined Memory Specifications

Lists 4GB, 64-bit, GDDR6 memory with 15.5 Gbps speed

Comprehensive Connectivity

Includes 1x HDMI 2.0 and 2x mini-DP outputs

Efficient Power Design

Specifies 50W TBP design with 75W TDP and low-profile slot

Overall score

Sparkle Computer Sparkle Intel Arc A310 ECO,
85
ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX
88

Specifications

SpecSparkle Computer Sparkle Intel Arc A310 ECO,ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX
Model NameSparkle Computer Sparkle Intel Arc A310 ECOASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX
BrandASRockSparkle Computer
Price$139.99$139.99
ChipsetIntel Arc A310Intel Arc A310 Chipset
Memory Capacity4GB
Memory Type/Speed64-bit, GDDR6, 15.5 Gbps
Video Outputs1x HDMI 2.0, 2x mini-DP
Power Design75W TDP, 50W TBP
Cooling SolutionSingle Fan, Striped AxialSingle-fan, single-slot
Architecture FeaturesXe HPG, Ray Tracing, XeSS

Dimension comparison

Sparkle Computer Sparkle Intel Arc A310 ECO,ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX

Design and build quality

The physical construction of these graphics cards reflects their intended use cases within compact or standard gaming systems. Product A, the Sparkle Intel Arc A310 ECO, emphasizes a stylish and streamlined design. It is built to integrate smoothly into gaming setups where aesthetics and airflow are prioritized. The build suggests a focus on maintaining a clean profile within the chassis. Product B, the ASRock Intel Arc A380 Challenger ITX, highlights a single-slot compact design. This form factor is particularly beneficial for small form factor builds where space is at a premium. It includes a free additional short bracket, enhancing its versatility for different case configurations. Both cards utilize a single-fan approach, indicating a design philosophy centered on efficiency rather than massive cooling arrays.

Cooling and Thermals

Thermal management is critical for maintaining sustained performance in graphics processing units. Product A features a single fan design that provides strong cooling performance. The manufacturer notes that this setup keeps the gaming system cool during operation. A key differentiator for Product A is the ASRock custom Striped Axial Fan. This component delivers enhanced airflow, optimized not only by the stripe structure on each fan blade but also by the polishing surface on the bottom side. These details suggest engineering focused on reducing turbulence and improving air movement. Product B utilizes a single-fan design as well but emphasizes its low-profile nature. While specific thermal metrics like maximum temperature are not provided for either unit, the explicit mention of cooling optimization in Product A gives it a slight edge in thermal design documentation.

Performance Capabilities

When evaluating raw performance potential, available data varies between the two models. Product B lists support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.3, which are essential APIs for modern gaming and rendering tasks. It also supports Intel XeSS upscaling and Real Time Ray Tracing, features that significantly impact visual fidelity and frame rates in supported titles. Product A mentions it is optimized for delivering an excellent gaming experience but does not list specific architecture features or API support in the provided text. Without explicit benchmark data or clock speeds for Product A, Product B holds an advantage in documented performance capabilities due to the confirmation of advanced rendering technologies.

Memory and Architecture

Memory configuration plays a vital role in how a graphics card handles textures and frame buffers. Product B provides clear specifications here, listing 4GB of 64-bit GDDR6 memory. It also specifies a graphics memory speed of 15.5 Gbps. This information allows users to calculate bandwidth and understand potential bottlenecks. Product A does not provide specific memory capacity or type details in the provided data. Regarding architecture, Product B confirms the use of Xe HPG Architecture. This foundation supports the aforementioned ray tracing and upscaling features. Product A implies similar capabilities by virtue of being an Intel Arc card, but the lack of explicit architectural details in the provided text makes Product B the more transparent option for technical buyers.

Power Efficiency and Requirements

Power consumption dictates the required power supply unit capacity and influences system heat output. Product B specifies a 75W TDP and a SPARKLE exclusive 50W TBP design. This low power draw is advantageous for energy-efficient builds and systems with limited power supply headroom. The low-profile single-slot design further supports use in power-constrained environments. Product A does not list a specific TDP or TBP value in the provided information. While both cards likely fall into the entry-level power category, the explicit 50W TBP design noted for Product B offers concrete data for system planners. This clarity helps in ensuring compatibility with smaller power supplies often found in ITX builds.

Connectivity and Ports

Display output options determine what monitors and setups the card can support. Product B lists a specific configuration of 1x HDMI 2.0 and 2x mini-DP ports. This combination allows for multi-monitor setups and compatibility with modern displays supporting HDMI 2.0 standards. Product A does not list any video output ports in the provided features. The absence of this information makes it difficult to verify compatibility with specific monitors without external research. For users who need to know exactly how many screens they can connect and what type of cables are required, Product B provides the necessary details to make an informed decision regarding connectivity.

Price and Value

Both graphics cards are listed at a price of $139.99. This identical pricing structure places them in direct competition within the budget segment of the market. Neither product currently has user ratings available, as both show N/A for reviews. Value is often determined by what features are included at this price point. Product B includes a free additional short bracket, which adds tangible value for users needing low-profile mounting options. Product A emphasizes ease of use and cooling design as its value propositions. Since the cost is identical, the decision relies on which feature set aligns better with the buyer's specific hardware requirements, such as port needs or memory specifications.

Which one should you buy?

Choosing between these two models depends on the importance of specification transparency versus cooling design details. If you require confirmed memory specs, port configurations, and power draw data, Product B is the logical choice. It offers a documented 4GB GDDR6 memory setup and clear connectivity options suitable for verified system builds. However, if your priority is a card with detailed cooling engineering descriptions and a focus on streamlined airflow design, Product A presents a compelling option. Both are priced equally at $139.99. For most builders who need to ensure compatibility with their existing monitors and power supplies, the detailed specifications of Product B provide a safer purchasing decision.