Tamron vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — Tamron wins on weight and min distance, VILTROX wins on focal length and build quality.
The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 excels in wide-angle photography, while the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 offers superior low-light performance and bokeh. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Tamron is better
Wide Angle
Better for landscapes and cityscapes
Compact Size
Lightweight and easy to carry
Close-ups
Short minimum object distance
Why VILTROX is better
Low Light
Brighter f/1.7 aperture
Autofocus
Faster and quieter autofocus
Versatility
Better for portraits and street photography
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Tamron | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.7 |
| Autofocus | Standard | Fast STM |
| Magnification | 1:2 | N/A |
| Elements | 9 | 11 |
| Weather Sealing | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 and VILTROX 35mm f1.7
The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 and VILTROX 35mm f1.7 are both excellent choices for photographers looking to enhance their lens collection for Sony E-mount cameras. Priced at $199.00 and $179.00 respectively, the VILTROX is about 10% cheaper than the Tamron. Both lenses cater to different shooting styles, making them appealing for various photography needs.
The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is a compact and lightweight lens designed for wide-angle photography, while the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 is tailored for portrait and street photography with its brighter aperture. Understanding the key features and capabilities of each lens will help you determine which one aligns best with your photographic endeavors.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design and build quality, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 boasts a lightweight construction at just 7.6 ounces and a compact length of 2.5 inches. This lens is ideal for photographers who prefer to travel light without sacrificing quality. The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 also emphasizes portability, weighing only 170 grams. Its sleek and durable metal body ensures longevity, making it a reliable choice for on-the-go photographers.
Tamron's lens features moisture-resistant construction and a dirt-repellent fluorine coating, allowing for confident outdoor shooting. Although the VILTROX does not explicitly mention weather sealing, its compact design and thoughtful details like an extended lens hood demonstrate its attention to usability and protection against stray light.
Optical Performance
When discussing optical performance, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is designed for wide-angle photography, allowing for immersive views of landscapes and urban scenes. With a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2 and a minimum object distance of just 4.7 inches, it excels in capturing detailed macro-style shots.
On the other hand, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 comes equipped with an optimized optical design featuring 11 elements in 9 groups, including specialized elements to minimize chromatic aberrations and flare. The bright f/1.7 aperture not only enhances low-light performance but also produces stunning background blur, ideal for portraiture. Overall, both lenses deliver impressive optical quality, but their strengths cater to different photography styles.
Versatility in Photography
The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is a versatile lens suited for various photography styles, including landscapes, cityscapes, and candid snapshots. Its wide-angle capability allows photographers to capture expansive scenes effectively. The lens’s ability to create unique close-ups, thanks to its short minimum object distance, adds to its versatility.
Conversely, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 is positioned as a prime lens that excels in portrait and street photography, providing a natural perspective akin to the human eye. Its versatility extends to a range of settings, from street photography to landscapes, due to its 53mm equivalent focal length. Each lens offers distinct advantages for different scenarios, allowing photographers to choose based on their preferred subjects.
Autofocus and Usability
Autofocus performance is critical for modern photography, and both lenses deliver in this aspect. The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 does not specify its autofocus capabilities but is designed for seamless use with Sony E-mount cameras. Its compact design and lightweight build make it user-friendly and easy to handle.
The VILTROX 35mm f1.7, however, features a new STM motor for fast and near-silent autofocus, minimizing focus breathing during video recording. This advanced autofocus system enhances usability, especially for videographers and those who frequently shoot in dynamic environments. Therefore, for users prioritizing autofocus performance, the VILTROX may have the edge.
Price Comparison
Price is often a decisive factor when choosing between lenses. The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is currently priced at $199.00, while the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 is available for $179.00. This makes the VILTROX approximately $20 cheaper, or about 10% less expensive than the Tamron. For budget-conscious photographers, the VILTROX offers a compelling option without compromising on performance, making it an attractive choice for those starting in photography or looking to expand their lens collection affordably.
Target Audience
Each lens is tailored to meet the needs of different photographers. The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is perfect for those who enjoy wide-angle photography, capturing breathtaking landscapes and urban environments. Its lightweight and compact design make it an ideal companion for travel and outdoor photography.
In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 caters to portrait photographers and street shooters who require a lens that performs well in low-light conditions and delivers beautiful bokeh. Its fast autofocus and thoughtful design details enhance its appeal for those looking to capture quick moments or create artistic portraits.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 and the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 depends on your specific photography needs and style. If you prioritize wide-angle photography and require a lens that excels in landscapes and close-ups, the Tamron is an excellent choice. However, if you are looking for a versatile lens that performs well in low light and is particularly suited for portraits and street photography, the VILTROX offers superior value at a lower price point. Both lenses have their unique strengths, making either a worthy addition to your photography toolkit.

