vsversusfinder

Tamron vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — Tamron wins on weight and aperture, VILTROX wins on length.

Winner

The Tamron 24mm offers superior weather resistance and versatility, while the VILTROX 35mm excels in low-light performance and affordability.

Why Tamron is better

Weather Resistance

Tamron features moisture-resistant construction.

Versatility

Tamron is better for various photography styles.

Macro Capability

Tamron has a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2.

Why VILTROX is better

Lower Price

VILTROX is priced at $179.00.

Larger Aperture

VILTROX has an F1.7 aperture for better bokeh.

Lightweight

VILTROX weighs only 170g.

Overall score

Tamron
85
VILTROX
78

Specifications

SpecTamronVILTROX
Price$199.00$179.00
Focal Length24mm35mm
AutofocusStandardSTM
Bokeh Blades79
Minimum Distance4.7 in0.0 in

Dimension comparison

TamronVILTROX

Overview of the Tamron 24mm and VILTROX 35mm Lenses

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 and VILTROX 35mm F1.7 lenses offer unique features that cater to different photography styles. The Tamron lens is priced at $199.00, while the VILTROX lens is more budget-friendly at $179.00, making it about 10% cheaper. This price difference could influence buyers looking for value without sacrificing quality.

Design and Build Quality

The Tamron 24mm lens boasts a compact design with a length of 2.5 inches and a lightweight of 7.6 oz, making it incredibly portable for photographers. It also features a moisture-resistant construction, allowing for outdoor use, while its dirt-resistant fluorine coating enhances durability. On the other hand, the VILTROX 35mm lens is slightly heavier at 170 g but is still considered lightweight. It offers a user-friendly design with a micro USB interface for firmware upgrades, which can enhance its longevity and performance. Both lenses prioritize portability, but the Tamron has the edge in weather resistance.

Optical Performance

When it comes to optical performance, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is designed for versatility, providing a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2, which is excellent for macro-style shots. Its F/2.8 aperture delivers beautiful bokeh for close-ups, while the lens’s special glass materials work to reduce aberrations, ensuring sharp images across the frame. The VILTROX 35mm F1.7, with its large aperture of F1.7, offers stunning natural bokeh and artistic blur, thanks to its 9 aperture blades. The optical structure features 11 elements in 9 groups, which includes specialized lenses for better image clarity. Both lenses excel in providing high-quality images, but the VILTROX may have an advantage for those prioritizing low-light performance.

Autofocus Capabilities

The autofocus systems of both lenses are tailored for precise and reliable performance. The Tamron lens description does not specify autofocus technology but is known for its effective operation, while the VILTROX 35mm lens utilizes a built-in STM stepping motor. This motor provides efficient autofocus and supports eye and face detection, enhancing tracking accuracy and responsiveness. The VILTROX's advanced autofocus may appeal more to those who frequently shoot moving subjects or require swift adjustments, making it a favorable choice for dynamic photography.

Versatility in Usage

The Tamron 24mm lens is celebrated for its wide-angle capabilities, making it perfect for landscapes, cityscapes, and everyday moments. Its compact design allows for easy transport, making it suitable for travel and street photography, while the close minimum object distance of 4.7 inches opens up creative possibilities. In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm lens is also versatile but leans towards portrait and detail shots due to its larger aperture and focal length. Both lenses can serve various shooting styles, but the Tamron may be more versatile for general photography needs.

Price and Value

With the Tamron priced at $199.00 and the VILTROX at $179.00, the latter presents a more cost-effective option for budget-conscious photographers. The price difference of $20 may seem minor, but it represents about 10% savings. Given that both lenses offer excellent optical performance and usability, the VILTROX could be seen as providing better value, especially for those who prioritize a larger aperture for creative effects.

Compatibility and Use Cases

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is designed specifically for Sony Full Frame and APS-C E-Mount mirrorless cameras, making it a great fit for a wide range of Sony camera users. Similarly, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is compatible with various Sony E-Mount cameras, including models like FX3 and A7 series. Both lenses cater to a similar demographic, but the choice may ultimately depend on the specific camera model and the type of photography each user intends to pursue.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Tamron 24mm and VILTROX 35mm lenses depends on your specific photography needs. If you prioritize a compact design with robust weather resistance and versatility, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is a solid choice. However, if you are looking for a larger aperture for enhanced bokeh and a more budget-friendly option, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 presents a compelling case. Both lenses offer excellent quality, but your decision should align with your shooting style and budget.