vsversusfinder

Tamron vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — Tamron wins on price and aperture, VILTROX wins on focal length and close focus.

Winner

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is ideal for wide-angle photography and outdoor use, while the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 excels in low-light conditions and portrait photography.

Why Tamron is better

Price

Tamron is $199.00, VILTROX is $179.00

Build Quality

Tamron has moisture-resistant construction

Macro Capability

Tamron offers 1:2 maximum magnification

Why VILTROX is better

Aperture

VILTROX has a brighter f/1.7 aperture

Autofocus

VILTROX features fast, near-silent autofocus

Versatility

VILTROX captures a natural perspective similar to the human eye

Overall score

Tamron
85
VILTROX
90

Specifications

SpecTamronVILTROX
Max Aperturef/2.8f/1.7
Minimum Focus4.7 in13 in
Weight7.6 oz8.0 oz
AutofocusStandardFast STM
Build QualityMoisture-resistantStandard

Dimension comparison

TamronVILTROX

Overview of the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 and VILTROX 35mm f/1.7

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 and VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 lenses cater to different photography needs and preferences. The Tamron lens is priced at $199.00, while the VILTROX lens is slightly cheaper at $179.00, making it about 10% less expensive. Both lenses offer unique features that appeal to various styles of photography, from landscapes to portraits.

Design and Build Quality

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 has a compact and lightweight design, measuring just 2.5 inches long and weighing 7.6 ounces. This makes it an excellent choice for photographers who need to pack lightly for all-day shooting. In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 features a thoughtful design with an extended lens hood for better protection against stray light. While both lenses are built to last, the Tamron's moisture-resistant construction and dirt-resistant fluorine coating provide additional durability for outdoor use, enhancing its versatility.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

A key difference between the two lenses lies in their maximum aperture. The VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 offers a bright f/1.7 aperture, which allows for exceptional low-light performance and beautiful background blur, making it ideal for portraits and street photography. The Tamron, on the other hand, has a maximum aperture of f/2.8. While it still performs well in various lighting conditions, it doesn't match the VILTROX's capabilities in low-light settings. This distinction makes the VILTROX a better option for photographers prioritizing low-light performance.

Focal Length and Versatility

The Tamron 24mm offers a focal length that excels in wide-angle photography, making it perfect for landscapes and urban scenes. This lens is particularly effective for capturing expansive scenery and everyday moments. Conversely, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 has a focal length that closely resembles the human eye, allowing it to capture sharp, vivid images across a variety of photography styles, including landscapes and portraits. While both are versatile, the choice between a wide-angle and a standard perspective will depend on the photographer's specific needs.

Autofocus and Shooting Experience

The VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 comes equipped with a new STM motor that provides fast, precise, and near-silent autofocus performance. This is particularly beneficial for video recording, as it minimizes focus breathing, ensuring smooth transitions. The Tamron 24mm also features a focus mechanism that allows for a minimum object distance of 4.7 inches, enabling unique close-up shots. While both lenses offer good autofocus capabilities, the VILTROX's advanced features enhance the shooting experience, especially for videographers.

Close Focusing and Macro Capabilities

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 boasts a 1:2 maximum magnification ratio, making it suitable for macro-style shots with its close focusing capability of 4.7 inches. This unique feature allows photographers to capture intricate details in their subjects. In comparison, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 has a close focusing distance of 0.33 meters (about 13 inches). While both lenses allow for close-up photography, the Tamron lens offers greater magnification potential, which could be a deciding factor for those interested in macro photography.

Price and Value Proposition

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is priced at $199.00, while the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 is priced at $179.00, making the VILTROX about 10% cheaper. Despite the price difference, both lenses deliver excellent value within their respective categories. The Tamron lens is well-suited for wide-angle photography and outdoor use, while the VILTROX lens excels in low-light conditions and portrait photography. Depending on the photographer’s budget and intended use, each lens offers solid performance and reliability.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 and the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If you are looking for a lightweight, compact lens for wide-angle shots and outdoor versatility, the Tamron is an excellent choice. However, if low-light performance and beautiful bokeh are your priorities, the VILTROX lens stands out with its f/1.7 aperture and fast autofocus capabilities. Both lenses represent great value, but understanding your shooting style will help you make the best decision.