vsversusfinder

Tamron vs YONGNUO

Updated July 2026 — Tamron wins on filter size and max aperture, YONGNUO wins on min focus and weight.

Winner

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 offers superior optical performance and versatility, while the YONGNUO 35mm F1.8 is a budget-friendly option with good low-light capabilities.

Why Tamron is better

Optics

Tamron has advanced optical design with low dispersion elements.

Versatility

Tamron is compatible with both full-frame and APS-C cameras.

Macro Capability

Tamron offers a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2.

Why YONGNUO is better

Price

YONGNUO is significantly cheaper.

Weight

YONGNUO is lighter than Tamron.

Quiet Autofocus

YONGNUO features a very quiet autofocus system.

Overall score

Tamron
85
YONGNUO
75

Specifications

SpecTamronYONGNUO
Focal Length24mm35mm
ApertureF/2.8F/1.8
Magnification1:2N/A
ConstructionMoisture-resistantWaterproof
CompatibilityFull-frame & APS-CAPS-C only

Dimension comparison

TamronYONGNUO

Overview of the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD and YONGNUO 35mm F1.8 Art

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD and the YONGNUO 35mm F1.8 Art are two noteworthy lenses designed for Sony’s E-mount mirrorless cameras. Priced at $199.00 and $128.00 respectively, the YONGNUO is about 36% cheaper than the Tamron model. Each lens caters to different photographic needs, making them appealing to various users.

Design and Build Quality

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 features a compact and lightweight design, measuring only 2.5 inches in length and weighing 7.6 oz. This makes it an excellent choice for photographers who prefer a portable option for traveling or all-day shooting sessions. In contrast, the YONGNUO 35mm F1.8 is slightly bulkier with an approximate diameter of 63.5mm and a length of 79.9mm. However, it boasts a solid construction with a metal bayonet and outer shell, ensuring durability. While both lenses are designed for outdoor use, the YONGNUO includes a special waterproof membrane, enhancing its resilience against the elements compared to the Tamron’s moisture-resistant construction.

Optics and Image Quality

When it comes to optics, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 provides an impressive maximum magnification ratio of 1:2, allowing for detailed macro-style shots. The lens employs special glass materials, including Low Dispersion and Glass Molded Aspherical elements, which minimize aberrations and deliver sharp images across the frame. On the other hand, the YONGNUO 35mm F1.8 is equipped with 10 elements in 9 groups, including 2 aspherical lenses and 2 ultra-low dispersion glass lenses, offering good compensation for various aberrations. Both lenses promise impressive image quality, but the Tamron's broader focal length may appeal more to landscape photographers, while the YONGNUO’s F1.8 aperture excels in low-light conditions and portrait photography.

Focusing and Performance

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 features a minimum object distance of just 4.7 inches, facilitating unique close-up shots that can be especially beneficial for capturing intricate details in nature or urban settings. The lens is designed to deliver beautiful background bokeh, enhancing the visual appeal of photographs. Conversely, the YONGNUO 35mm F1.8 has a minimum focusing distance of 0.35m, which still allows for decent close-up photography but is not as close as the Tamron. The YONGNUO lens is noted for its quiet auto-focus, making it suitable for both photography and video recording, an advantage for those who frequently shoot in dynamic environments.

Compatibility and Use Cases

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is a versatile lens compatible with full-frame and APS-C Sony E-mount cameras, making it a general-purpose option for a variety of shooting styles from landscapes to street photography. On the other hand, the YONGNUO 35mm F1.8 is specifically optimized for APS-C frame cameras, making it a strong contender for users focused on portrait or everyday photography. It supports a wide range of Sony models, including the A7 series and ZV-E series, ensuring broad compatibility. This flexibility in the YONGNUO model adds to its appeal for users seeking a reliable standard prime lens.

Price and Value Proposition

At $199.00, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is positioned as a premium option in the wide-angle lens market. In comparison, the YONGNUO 35mm F1.8, priced at $128.00, offers a more budget-friendly alternative without sacrificing significant features. This substantial price difference of approximately $71 suggests that the YONGNUO could be a more accessible choice for beginner photographers or those on a tighter budget. While the Tamron lens may justify its price through its advanced optical design and versatility, the YONGNUO provides excellent value for those primarily shooting in standard focal lengths.

User Experience and Reviews

User reviews for both lenses highlight their strengths. The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is praised for its sharpness and compact design, making it a favorite among landscape and travel photographers. However, it lacks significant user reviews or bestseller rankings that might suggest a higher demand. Meanwhile, the YONGNUO 35mm F1.8 is often noted for its affordability and impressive performance in low-light situations. Users appreciate its quiet autofocus, which enhances its usability in video recording. The feedback on the YONGNUO indicates a solid entry into the market for casual photographers, allowing for quality shots without breaking the bank.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 and the YONGNUO 35mm F1.8 ultimately depends on your specific photography needs and budget. If you seek a compact, versatile lens for various shooting styles, particularly landscapes, the Tamron may be worth the extra investment. However, if you're looking for a reliable and more affordable standard prime lens for portraits and everyday photography, the YONGNUO offers great value without sacrificing quality. Consider your shooting style, budget, and desired features to make an informed decision that best suits your photography journey.