vsversusfinder

Tamron vs YONGNUO YN35mm F2 Lens 1:2 AF/MF Wide-Angle

Updated July 2026 — Tamron wins on min focus and focal length, YONGNUO YN35mm F2 Lens 1:2 AF/MF Wide-Angle wins on diameter and length.

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 lens offers superior optical performance and build quality, making it the better choice for serious photographers, while the YONGNUO YN35mm F2 is a budget-friendly option for casual users.

Why Tamron is better

Optical Quality

Tamron has better low-light performance and bokeh.

Build Quality

Tamron features moisture-resistant construction.

Close Focus

Tamron has a minimum object distance of 4.7 inches.

Why YONGNUO YN35mm F2 Lens 1:2 AF/MF Wide-Angle is better

Price

YONGNUO is significantly cheaper at $106.

Weight

YONGNUO is lighter than Tamron.

Versatility

YONGNUO is good for general photography.

Overall score

Tamron
88
YONGNUO YN35mm F2 Lens 1:2 AF/MF Wide-Angle
75

Specifications

SpecTamronYONGNUO YN35mm F2 Lens 1:2 AF/MF Wide-Angle
ApertureF/2.8F/2
Max Magnification1:20.23X
Moisture ResistanceYesNo
Auto FocusYesYes
Minimum Distance4.7 in0.8 ft

Dimension comparison

TamronYONGNUO YN35mm F2 Lens 1:2 AF/MF Wide-Angle

Overview of the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 and YONGNUO YN35mm F2

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 lens is a compact and lightweight option designed for Sony's full-frame and APS-C E-Mount mirrorless cameras, while the YONGNUO YN35mm F2 is a versatile lens for Canon EF mount cameras. Both lenses cater to different photography styles with unique feature sets. The Tamron is priced at $199.00, whereas the YONGNUO is significantly cheaper at $106.00, making it about 47% less expensive.

Design and Build Quality

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 features a compact design with a length of 2.5 inches and a weight of only 7.6oz, making it highly portable for photographers on the move. It also has a moisture-resistant construction and a dirt-resistant fluorine coating, which adds durability for outdoor use. In contrast, the YONGNUO YN35mm F2 has a slightly bulkier design with dimensions of 73mm in diameter and 59mm in length, weighing more than the Tamron. However, it incorporates a chrome high-precision metal bayonet that enhances fit and durability. While both lenses offer solid construction, the Tamron's moisture and dirt resistance make it a better choice for outdoor photography.

Optical Performance

When it comes to optical performance, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 excels with its impressive F/2.8 aperture, which allows for beautiful bokeh effects and excellent low-light performance. The lens has a minimum object distance of just 4.7 inches, enabling unique close-up shots with a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2. In comparison, the YONGNUO YN35mm F2 lens also has an F/2 aperture, making it suitable for low-light conditions. However, its maximum magnification is lower at 0.23X, which may limit creative close-up photography. Overall, the Tamron lens offers superior optical capabilities, especially for macro-style shots.

Focal Length and Versatility

The Tamron 24mm lens provides a wide-angle view, making it ideal for landscapes, cityscapes, and everyday moments. This versatility allows photographers to capture expansive scenes effectively. Conversely, the YONGNUO YN35mm offers a slightly longer focal length, which is favored for portraits and general photography. Its diagonal view angle coverage of 63 degrees makes it versatile for various shooting situations, but it may not capture the same breadth of scenery as the Tamron. For those focused on wide-angle photography, the Tamron is the clear winner.

Autofocus and Manual Focus Features

Both lenses support autofocus (AF) and manual focus (MF) modes, catering to photographers who prefer flexibility in their shooting styles. The YONGNUO YN35mm incorporates a fast AF system, enabling quick adjustments in changing lighting conditions. However, the Tamron's advanced optical design and close focusing capabilities allow for smoother transitions between focus modes, enhancing the overall shooting experience. This makes it particularly appealing for photographers who often switch between AF and MF.

Price Comparison and Value

The YONGNUO YN35mm is priced at $106.00, making it a budget-friendly option compared to the Tamron 24mm at $199.00. This price difference of approximately $93 reflects a significant cost-saving of about 47%. While the YONGNUO offers great value for those starting in photography or looking for an economical lens, the Tamron provides advanced features and superior build quality that may justify its higher price for serious photographers.

Ideal Use Cases

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 lens is ideal for landscape photography, urban scenes, and capturing intricate details up close, thanks to its compact design and exceptional optical performance. It serves well for outdoor adventures where durability is essential. On the other hand, the YONGNUO YN35mm F2 is well-suited for portraits and general photography, especially for Canon users looking for an affordable option. Its versatility and decent optical quality make it a good choice for casual shooters.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 and the YONGNUO YN35mm F2 ultimately depends on your needs and budget. If you prioritize superior optical performance, durability, and close-up capabilities, the Tamron is the better investment at $199. However, if you're looking for a more affordable lens that still offers decent quality for general photography, the YONGNUO at $106 is an excellent choice. Consider your shooting style and budget before making a decision.