Thermalright AXP90-X53 Full Cooper Low Profile CPU vs Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO CPU Cooler,7×
Updated August 2026 — Thermalright AXP90-X53 Full Cooper Low Profile CPU wins on size efficiency and noise level, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO CPU Cooler,7× wins on cooling performa and compatibility.
The Thermalright AXP90-X53 is a more economical choice for compact builds, while the Phantom Spirit 120 EVO offers superior cooling performance. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Thermalright AXP90-X53 Full Cooper Low Profile CPU is better
Price
AXP90-X53 is cheaper at $35.90
Noise
AXP90-X53 operates at 22.4 dB(A)
Height
AXP90-X53 is only 53mm tall
Why Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO CPU Cooler,7× is better
Airflow
Phantom Spirit has 69 CFM airflow
Cooling Performance
Phantom Spirit handles higher thermal loads
Compatibility
Phantom Spirit supports more Intel sockets
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Thermalright AXP90-X53 Full Cooper Low Profile CPU | Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO CPU Cooler,7× |
|---|---|---|
| Max RPM | 2700 | 2150 |
| Noise Level | 22.4 dB(A) | 27 dB(A) |
| Heat Pipes | 4x6mm | 7x6mm |
| Material | Copper | Aluminum |
| Socket Support | AMD AM4/AM5, Intel LGA1700/1150/1151/1200 | AMD AM4/AM5, Intel LGA1700/1150/1151/1200/2011/2066 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Thermalright AXP90-X53 Full Copper Low Profile CPU Cooler
The Thermalright AXP90-X53 is priced at $35.90, making it the more economical choice compared to its competitor. This low-profile CPU cooler is designed specifically for compact systems such as ITX builds, with a height of just 53mm. The cooler features a 92mm TL-9015R slim PWM fan, which operates at a maximum speed of 2700 RPM and generates a noise level of 22.4 dB(A). It utilizes advanced AGHP technology with four 6mm heat pipes that enhance heat transfer efficiency. This cooler is compatible with a variety of CPU sockets, including AMD AM4/AM5 and Intel 1700/1150/1151/1200/1851.
Overview of the Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO CPU Cooler
On the other hand, the Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO retails for $46.90, about 17% more expensive than the AXP90-X53. This CPU cooler features a larger design, measuring 125mm in length, 135mm in width, and 157mm in height. It includes dual PWM fans that can reach a speed of 2150 RPM, providing an impressive airflow of 69 CFM. The dual fans are designed to operate quietly, with noise levels capped at 27 dB(A). This cooler also supports a wide range of CPU sockets, including AMD AM4/AM5 and Intel 1700/1150/1151/1200/2011/2066, making it a versatile option for various builds.
Cooling Performance Comparison
When it comes to cooling performance, the Thermalright AXP90-X53 utilizes a pure copper base and advanced heat pipe technology, which provides effective heat dissipation for compact systems. Its maximum air pressure of 1.33 mmH2O ensures adequate cooling in tight spaces. However, the Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO offers a higher airflow of 69 CFM compared to the AXP90-X53's maximum of 42.58 CFM. This higher airflow, combined with its larger heat sink and dual fans, allows the Phantom Spirit to handle thermal loads more effectively, making it a better choice for high-performance CPUs.
Noise Levels
Noise levels are crucial in selecting a CPU cooler, especially for users concerned with maintaining a quiet system. The AXP90-X53 operates at a lower maximum noise level of 22.4 dB(A), which is quieter than the Phantom Spirit's maximum noise level of 27 dB(A). While the difference may seem minimal, it can be noticeable in quiet environments. Users who prioritize a silent operation might lean towards the AXP90-X53, while those who can tolerate slightly more noise for better cooling performance may find the Phantom Spirit acceptable.
Installation and Compatibility
Both coolers boast broad compatibility with major CPU sockets. The Thermalright AXP90-X53 supports Intel LGA1700/1150/1151/1155/1156/1200 and AMD AM4/AM5, while the Phantom Spirit supports a wider range of Intel sockets, including LGA2011 and LGA2066. Installation for both coolers is straightforward, with each product including the necessary mounting hardware. However, the AXP90-X53 has specific installation notes regarding conflicts with motherboard components, which might require additional steps. This aspect could be a consideration for users less comfortable with installation.
Build Quality and Aesthetics
In terms of build quality, both coolers exhibit a high level of craftsmanship. The AXP90-X53 features a fine finish with a pure copper radiator that enhances oxidation resistance. The Phantom Spirit 120 EVO, on the other hand, showcases a dual-tower design with anodized black frosted aluminum, which not only looks sleek but also maximizes heat dissipation area. The aesthetic appeal of the Phantom Spirit may attract users looking for a cooler that stands out in their builds, while the AXP90-X53’s minimalist design caters to those who prefer a low-profile look.
Price-to-Performance Ratio
In evaluating the price-to-performance ratio, the AXP90-X53 stands out as the more budget-friendly option at $35.90. It offers solid performance for compact builds, making it an excellent choice for users looking to save money. In contrast, the Phantom Spirit 120 EVO, priced at $46.90, provides superior cooling performance but at a higher cost. For users whose builds require more robust cooling solutions, the additional investment in the Phantom Spirit may be justified. However, for standard use scenarios, the AXP90-X53 does not compromise on performance given its lower price.
Which should you buy?
If you are looking for a compact and quieter cooling solution for a small form factor build, the Thermalright AXP90-X53 is the ideal choice, coming in at $35.90 and offering effective cooling for its size. However, if your setup demands higher cooling performance and you have the budget for it, the Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO, priced at $46.90, provides superior airflow and thermal management. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your specific cooling needs, system size, and budget constraints.

