Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 Vision MAX ARGB vs Thermaltake Gravity i3 Intel LGA 1700 Cocket, 95W
Updated August 2026 — Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 Vision MAX ARGB wins on cooling perf and noise level, Thermaltake Gravity i3 Intel LGA 1700 Cocket, 95W wins on warranty.
The Thermalright Peerless Assassin offers superior cooling performance and features, making it the better choice for high-performance builds, while the Thermaltake Gravity i3 is a budget-friendly option for low-power processors.
Why Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 Vision MAX ARGB is better
Cooling Performance
Peerless Assassin has higher airflow and fan speed.
Features
Includes a 5-inch IPS LCD screen for monitoring.
Compatibility
Supports a wider range of CPU sockets.
Why Thermaltake Gravity i3 Intel LGA 1700 Cocket, 95W is better
Price
Gravity i3 is significantly cheaper.
Installation
Easier installation process for beginners.
Size
Low-profile design suitable for compact builds.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 Vision MAX ARGB | Thermaltake Gravity i3 Intel LGA 1700 Cocket, 95W |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Power | High | 95W |
| Noise Level | 27 dB(A) | 36.5 dB |
| Warranty | N/A | 2 years |
| Material | Copper/Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Fan Type | Dual | Single |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
The Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 Vision MAX ARGB Black CPU Air Cooler is a high-performance cooling solution, while the Thermaltake Gravity i3 is a budget-friendly option designed for lower power processors. The Peerless Assassin is priced at $57.69, whereas the Gravity i3 comes in at a significantly lower price of $17.79, making it about 69% cheaper. This price difference highlights their target markets and intended use cases, with the former aimed at gamers and enthusiasts and the latter appealing to more casual users looking for basic cooling.
Cooling Performance
In terms of cooling performance, the Thermalright Peerless Assassin is designed for superior efficiency with a dual-tower configuration and dual fans that can reach speeds of 2150 RPM, achieving an airflow of 69 CFM. This design is complemented by six pure copper heat pipes, ensuring optimal heat dissipation. Conversely, the Thermaltake Gravity i3 offers a more modest performance profile, featuring a 92mm fan with a maximum airflow of 56.84 CFM and a fan speed ranging between 1200 to 3500 RPM. While the Gravity i3 can handle cooling for processors up to 95W, the Peerless Assassin is suited for much higher thermal loads, making it a better choice for high-performance CPUs.
Design and Aesthetics
The design of the Thermalright Peerless Assassin is not only functional but also visually appealing, featuring a 5-inch IPS LCD screen that allows real-time monitoring of system parameters. This screen offers a resolution of 480x854 and integrates with TRCC control software for a customizable experience. In contrast, the Thermaltake Gravity i3 adopts a low-profile design, standing at just 2.58 inches in height. While it is practical for small builds, it lacks the aesthetic features that enthusiasts may desire. The matte black finish of the Peerless Assassin provides a sleek look, making it a more attractive option for those who value aesthetics alongside performance.
Compatibility
Compatibility is a significant aspect when choosing a CPU cooler. The Thermalright Peerless Assassin supports a wide range of Intel sockets, including LGA 1851, 1700, and 115x, as well as AMD's AM4 and AM5. This broad compatibility makes it a versatile choice for various builds. Conversely, the Thermaltake Gravity i3 is specifically designed for Intel LGA 1851 and 1700 sockets. While this targeted compatibility may suffice for many users, it limits the Gravity i3's versatility compared to the Peerless Assassin.
Installation Process
The installation of the Thermaltake Gravity i3 is designed to be quick and easy, making it ideal for users who may not have extensive experience with PC building. It features a straightforward mounting system that simplifies the setup process. On the other hand, the Thermalright Peerless Assassin, while still manageable, involves a more complex installation due to its dual-tower design and additional components. Users looking for a hassle-free installation may prefer the Gravity i3, while those willing to invest more time may appreciate the enhanced performance of the Peerless Assassin.
Noise Levels
Noise levels can significantly affect the user experience, especially in a quiet workspace or gaming environment. The Thermalright Peerless Assassin operates at a maximum noise level of 27 dB(A), which is quite reasonable for a high-performance cooler. In contrast, the Thermaltake Gravity i3 has a higher noise level of 36.5 dB, reflecting its simpler fan design and higher operational limits. Users sensitive to noise may find the Peerless Assassin more appealing due to its quieter operation, making it a better choice for those prioritizing a peaceful environment.
Warranty and Longevity
The warranty and expected lifespan of a cooler can influence purchasing decisions. The Thermaltake Gravity i3 comes with a two-year warranty, reflecting the brand's confidence in its product's durability. It is designed for a fan life of around 40,000 hours. The Thermalright Peerless Assassin, while lacking specific warranty details in the provided data, is built with longevity in mind, featuring S-FDB V2 bearings in its fans that are known for their durability. Users looking for long-term reliability may gravitate towards the Peerless Assassin, especially for high-performance builds.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 Vision MAX ARGB and the Thermaltake Gravity i3 boils down to your specific needs and budget. If you're seeking a high-performance cooling solution with robust features and aesthetics, the Peerless Assassin is well worth its higher price of $57.69. However, if you need a cost-effective, straightforward cooler for a low-power processor, the Gravity i3 is an attractive option at just $17.79. Ultimately, your choice should reflect your performance needs, budget constraints, and design preferences.

