TTArtisan vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — TTArtisan wins on aperture, VILTROX wins on weight and price.
The TTArtisan 25mm F2 offers great value for budget-conscious photographers, while the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 excels in low-light performance and autofocus capabilities.
Why TTArtisan is better
Price
TTArtisan is significantly cheaper at $64.00.
Wide Angle
TTArtisan offers a wider perspective at 25mm.
Portability
TTArtisan is compact and easy to carry.
Why VILTROX is better
Aperture
VILTROX has a larger maximum aperture of F1.7.
Autofocus
VILTROX features fast and precise autofocus.
Optical Design
VILTROX has a more sophisticated optical design.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | TTArtisan | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | F2 | F1.7 |
| Focal Length | 25mm | 35mm |
| Autofocus | Manual | Yes |
| Weight | N/A | 170g |
| Image Quality | Good | Excellent |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the TTArtisan 25mm F2 and VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E
When comparing the TTArtisan 25mm F2 Wide-Angle APS-C Camera Lens and the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E, the fundamental difference lies in their focal lengths and apertures. The TTArtisan lens offers a wider perspective at 25mm with a maximum aperture of F2, while the VILTROX features a slightly longer focal length of 35mm with a larger aperture of F1.7. This impacts how each lens performs in different lighting conditions and creative scenarios.
The TTArtisan lens, priced at $64.00, is more affordable than the VILTROX lens, which comes in at $179.00. This significant price difference of about 70% may influence budget-conscious photographers looking for a versatile lens option.
Aperture Performance
Aperture plays a vital role in how each lens handles light and depth of field. The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E lens has a larger maximum aperture of F1.7, providing superior low-light performance and the ability to achieve a more pronounced bokeh effect. This makes it particularly suitable for portrait and street photography where background blur is desired.
In contrast, the TTArtisan 25mm F2 still offers commendable low-light capabilities, but it may not achieve the same level of background separation as the VILTROX. The difference in aperture size may appeal to photographers who prioritize creative depth of field effects.
Focal Length and Versatility
The TTArtisan lens has a focal length equivalent to 37.5mm on a full-frame camera, making it an excellent choice for various photography styles, including daily photography and visual art creation. Its wide-angle capabilities allow for more expansive compositions, which can be beneficial for landscapes and group shots.
On the other hand, the VILTROX 35mm lens offers a focal length that closely resembles the natural perspective of the human eye, making it a versatile option for both landscapes and portraits. The choice between these two lenses may ultimately depend on the photographer's style and intended subjects.
Build Quality and Design
Both lenses are designed with portability in mind, but they differ in construction quality. The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E is compact and lightweight, weighing only 170g, which makes it an ideal choice for photographers on the move. Its sleek, durable metal body suggests a focus on longevity and performance.
Conversely, while specific weight details for the TTArtisan are not provided, its compact design enhances portability, allowing photographers to carry it easily. The design features of both lenses cater to different preferences, whether one prioritizes rugged durability or lightweight convenience.
Autofocus Capabilities
The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E lens is equipped with a new STM motor, delivering fast and precise autofocus performance that is both near-silent and efficient. This is particularly advantageous for video recording, as it minimizes focus breathing, maintaining smooth framing during transitions.
In contrast, the TTArtisan lens is a manual focus lens. While this allows for greater control over focus, it may require more time and skill to achieve accurate results, especially for those accustomed to autofocus systems. This difference may affect usability for photographers who prefer quick adjustments in dynamic shooting environments.
Optical Design and Image Quality
The VILTROX 35mm lens boasts an optimized optical design with 11 elements in 9 groups, including special elements to minimize chromatic aberrations and distortion. This sophisticated design ensures sharp, vivid images across various scenarios, making it a strong contender for quality-focused photographers.
The TTArtisan lens also promises good image quality, particularly with its F2 aperture, which can create pleasing bokeh and handle low-light situations effectively. However, it may not match the level of optical sophistication found in the VILTROX, which could be a consideration for those prioritizing absolute image quality.
Price Consideration
The TTArtisan 25mm F2 is priced at $64.00, making it a budget-friendly option for photographers looking for a capable lens without breaking the bank. In comparison, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E is priced at $179.00, which is over 2.7 times more expensive. This substantial price gap of about $115 may lead budget-conscious consumers to favor the TTArtisan lens unless they specifically need the features offered by the VILTROX.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the TTArtisan 25mm F2 and the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E ultimately depends on your specific photography needs and budget. If you are looking for an affordable, versatile lens with a wide-angle perspective, the TTArtisan is a strong choice. However, if you prioritize low-light performance, autofocus capabilities, and superior optical design, the VILTROX may justify its higher price. Consider your shooting style, subjects, and whether you need the advanced features of the VILTROX, or if the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of the TTArtisan meet your requirements.

