vsversusfinder

TTArtisan vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — TTArtisan wins on min focus dist and focal length, VILTROX wins on price and weight.

Winner

The VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji offers superior optical design and low-light performance, making it the better choice for serious photographers. However, the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L is a more budget-friendly option.

Why TTArtisan is better

Lower Price

TTArtisan is $168.00 compared to VILTROX's $179.00.

Compact Size

TTArtisan is lighter at 167-176g.

Versatile Focal Length

40mm is ideal for street and travel photography.

Why VILTROX is better

Better Aperture

VILTROX has a f/1.7 aperture for low-light performance.

Advanced Autofocus

VILTROX features fast and near-silent autofocus.

Superior Optical Design

VILTROX has 11 elements in 9 groups for better image quality.

Overall score

TTArtisan
78
VILTROX
85

Specifications

SpecTTArtisanVILTROX
AutofocusSTM MotorSTM Motor
Image QualityGoodExcellent
Build QualityCompactAdvanced
VersatilityStreet/TravelPortraits
Close Focus0.4m0.33m

Dimension comparison

TTArtisanVILTROX

Overview of the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L and VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji

The TTArtisan 40mm F2 L is priced at $168.00, while the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji comes in at $179.00, making the TTArtisan about 6% cheaper. Both lenses are designed for different camera systems, with the TTArtisan compatible with L-Mount cameras like the Sigma FP and Panasonic S series, while the VILTROX is tailored for Fujifilm X-Mount cameras including the X-T1 and X-T4. This price difference positions the TTArtisan as a more budget-friendly option, which may appeal to photographers looking for quality without spending too much.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

One of the standout features of the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji is its bright f/1.7 aperture, which provides exceptional low-light performance and allows for beautiful background blur. In comparison, the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L, with its f/2 aperture, also offers decent low-light capabilities but is not as pronounced as the VILTROX. The difference in aperture size can significantly impact the usability of the lenses in challenging lighting conditions, making the VILTROX a preferable choice for night photography or scenarios requiring a shallow depth of field.

Autofocus Capabilities

The TTArtisan 40mm F2 L is equipped with a quiet and fast autofocus system, utilizing an STM stepping motor for precision and smoothness. On the other hand, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji also features a new STM motor that delivers fast and near-silent autofocus performance while minimizing focus breathing. Both lenses excel in autofocus, but the VILTROX's advanced features may provide an edge for videographers looking for seamless transitions. This makes it a versatile option for both photography and video, particularly in dynamic shooting environments.

Optical Design and Image Quality

When it comes to image quality, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji benefits from a more sophisticated optical design, featuring 11 elements in 9 groups, which includes 2 High Refractive (HR) elements and 1 Extra-low Dispersion (ED) element. This combination effectively minimizes chromatic aberrations and distortion. In contrast, the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L uses ED and Aspherical elements for clarity but has a simpler design. This may result in the VILTROX delivering sharper and more vivid images across various photography styles, making it a better option for those who prioritize optical performance.

Focal Length Versatility

The TTArtisan 40mm F2 L offers a 40mm focal length, which is well-suited for street, travel, and everyday photography, balancing environmental context with subject isolation. Conversely, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji has a focal length of 53mm (equivalent), making it slightly more versatile for portraiture as it mimics a natural perspective akin to the human eye. This difference can influence the type of photography each lens excels in, with the VILTROX being particularly effective for portraits and creative shots while the TTArtisan serves well for broader scenes.

Minimum Focusing Distance

In terms of minimum focusing distance, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji has a close focusing capability of just 0.33m (33cm), allowing for impressive detail in close-up shots. The TTArtisan 40mm F2 L, with a minimum focusing distance of 0.4m, is slightly less capable in this regard. This means that the VILTROX may be the better choice for macro photography or capturing fine details, providing photographers with more creative options for close-up work.

Design and Build Quality

Both lenses feature thoughtful design elements, but they cater to different user preferences. The VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji includes an extended lens hood to reduce stray light and enhance image contrast. It also has a USB-C upgrade port for firmware updates, which adds a modern touch to its usability. The TTArtisan 40mm F2 L, while compact and lightweight at 167-176g, does not offer similar advanced features. Those who appreciate the latest technology and design improvements may find the VILTROX more appealing.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L and the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji largely depends on your specific photography needs and camera system. If you are looking for a budget-friendly option with good low-light performance, the TTArtisan at $168.00 might be the right fit. However, if you prioritize superior optical design, advanced autofocus capabilities, and versatility for both photography and videography, the VILTROX at $179.00 offers compelling features that justify its slightly higher price. Ultimately, each lens has its strengths, making them suitable for different styles and preferences.