TTARTISAN vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — TTARTISAN wins on focal length and min focus, VILTROX wins on price and field of view.
The TTARTISAN 40mm f2 Lens is a better choice for low-light photography and portraits, while the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E excels in wide-angle versatility.
Why TTARTISAN is better
Low Light
TTARTISAN performs better in low-light conditions.
Price
TTARTISAN is $31 cheaper.
Portraits
TTARTISAN offers a more natural perspective for portraits.
Why VILTROX is better
Wide Angle
VILTROX provides a much wider field of view.
Close Focus
VILTROX has a closer minimum focusing distance.
Autofocus
VILTROX has reliable autofocus for dynamic scenes.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | TTARTISAN | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | f/2 | f/2.8 |
| Autofocus | STM | STM |
| Optical Design | 5 elements | 13 elements |
| Tracking | Face/Eye | None |
| Material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the TTARTISAN 40mm f2 Lens and VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E
When choosing between the TTARTISAN 40mm f2 Lens and the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E, the decision largely hinges on the type of photography you intend to pursue. The TTARTISAN 40mm f2 is priced at $168.00, while the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E comes in at $199.00, making the TTARTISAN about 17% cheaper. Both lenses serve distinct purposes, appealing to different photographic styles and needs.
Build Quality and Portability
Both lenses boast lightweight and portable designs, ideal for photographers on the move. The TTARTISAN 40mm f2 weighs only 167g, while the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E is slightly heavier at 175g. Despite the minor weight difference, both are crafted for easy transport. The TTARTISAN lens features a metal build from premium aerospace aluminum, which enhances its durability without compromising weight. In contrast, the VILTROX lens, while also lightweight, includes thoughtful design details such as a lotus-shaped lens hood for better protection against stray light.
Optical Performance
Optical performance is pivotal when comparing these lenses. The TTARTISAN 40mm f2 offers a perspective that mimics the human eye with a 57° full-frame angle, allowing for authentic texture capture at a minimum focus distance of 0.4m. Conversely, the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E provides a much wider field of view at 113.8°, suitable for landscapes and vlogging. Its optical design includes 13 elements in 11 groups, featuring high refractive and extra-low dispersion elements for sharp images from the center to the edges. Thus, your choice should depend on whether you prefer natural perspectives or expansive, wide-angle shots.
Low Light Performance
Low light capabilities are particularly notable in the TTARTISAN 40mm f2, attributed to its bright f/2 aperture that delivers clarity and vivid color even in challenging dim conditions. This feature transforms night scenes into gallery-worthy captures, a significant advantage for night photography enthusiasts. On the other hand, while the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E also performs adequately in low light, it does not match the low-light prowess of the TTARTISAN. Photographers who frequently work in poorly lit environments may find the TTARTISAN more suitable.
Autofocus Technology
Both lenses utilize advanced autofocus technology, but their approaches differ. The TTARTISAN 40mm f2 features an STM motor for smooth focus transitions, along with face and eye tracking capabilities that are particularly beneficial for portrait photography and video work. The VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E also employs an STM motor, ensuring fast and accurate autofocus, making it excellent for capturing dynamic scenes and vlogging. While both lenses are equipped for autofocus, the TTARTISAN may offer more reliability for portrait-focused tasks.
Versatility in Photography
Versatility is another key aspect to consider. The TTARTISAN 40mm f2, with its human-eye perspective, excels in portraiture and street photography, allowing for intimate captures of everyday life. The minimum focus distance of 0.4m enhances its versatility for close-up shots. Meanwhile, the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E is designed for a broader range of scenarios, from wide landscapes to detailed close-ups at a minimum focus distance of just 0.13m. This makes it a fantastic choice for photographers who often switch between different styles, particularly in vlogging and landscape photography.
Price and Value
When it comes to price, the TTARTISAN 40mm f2 is more economical at $168.00 compared to the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E's $199.00. This price difference of $31 may be significant for budget-conscious photographers, particularly those who are just starting or who may not want to invest heavily in gear. However, value also depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer. While the VILTROX is pricier, its features may justify the expense for some users who prioritize wide-angle capabilities.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the TTARTISAN 40mm f2 Lens and the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E ultimately depends on your specific photographic requirements. If you are looking for a cost-effective option that excels in low-light conditions and offers a natural perspective for portraits, the TTARTISAN is a compelling choice. Conversely, if your focus is on wide-angle photography, landscapes, or vlogging, the VILTROX may be worth the extra investment. Consider your shooting style, the environments you work in, and your budget to make the best decision for your photography journey.

