vsversusfinder

VILTROX vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — VILTROX wins on price and weight, VILTROX wins on focal length and build.

Winner

The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E is a more budget-friendly and versatile option, while the 16mm F1.8 FE excels in wide-angle photography and autofocus capabilities.

Why VILTROX is better

Wide Angle

16mm focal length is better for landscapes.

Autofocus

Advanced tracking features for portraits.

Display

Includes smart LCD display for shooting parameters.

Why VILTROX is better

Price

$179.00 is significantly cheaper than $580.00.

Weight

Lighter at 170g compared to 19.5 ounces.

Versatility

More suitable for various photography styles.

Overall score

VILTROX
78
VILTROX
85

Specifications

SpecVILTROXVILTROX
AutofocusSTM motor with trackingSTM motor, low focus breathing
Optical Design12 groups, 15 elements11 elements, 9 groups
Image QualityHigh resolutionMinimized aberrations
PortabilityHeavierLightweight
Special FeaturesSmart LCD displayUSB-C upgrade port

Dimension comparison

VILTROXVILTROX

Price Comparison

The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E is significantly cheaper than the VILTROX 16mm F1.8 FE Lens. Priced at $179.00, the 35mm lens is about 69% less expensive than the 16mm lens, which retails for $580.00. This substantial price difference makes the 35mm lens a more budget-friendly option for photographers. For those who are starting out or looking to add a versatile lens to their kit without breaking the bank, the 35mm offers an attractive entry point into high-quality photography.

Aperture Performance

Both lenses excel in low-light conditions due to their large apertures, but they differ slightly in specifications. The VILTROX 16mm F1.8 FE boasts an f/1.8 aperture, while the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E offers an even wider f/1.7 maximum aperture. This means that the 35mm lens can capture more light, which is beneficial for shooting in dimly lit environments, and it allows for a shallower depth of field, enhancing the background blur in portraits and creative shots. Thus, if low-light performance and bokeh are paramount, the 35mm lens edges out the competition.

Focal Length and Field of View

The VILTROX 16mm F1.8 FE provides a wider angle of view with its 16mm focal length, making it ideal for expansive landscapes and cityscapes. In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E has a focal length of 35mm, offering a natural perspective that closely resembles the human eye. This makes the 35mm lens versatile for various photography styles, including portraits and street photography. If your primary focus is on wide-angle shots, the 16mm lens is a better choice; however, for more general photography needs, the 35mm lens may prove more useful.

Autofocus Capabilities

Both lenses feature advanced autofocus systems, yet they employ different technologies. The VILTROX 16mm F1.8 FE is equipped with a built-in STM stepping motor, ensuring fast and precise autofocus, even in challenging lighting situations. It also includes advanced eye and face recognition technology, which takes tracking capabilities to a new level. Meanwhile, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E also features a new STM motor, promoting quick and silent autofocus performance, along with low focus breathing, which is particularly beneficial for video recording. While both lenses offer excellent autofocus, the 16mm lens may have a slight edge for portrait photographers due to its advanced tracking features.

Build Quality and Design

In terms of design, the VILTROX 16mm F1.8 FE is slightly heavier, weighing in at 19.5 ounces compared to the 35mm lens, which is just 170 grams. The 35mm lens is not only lighter but also boasts a compact and portable design, making it a more practical option for photographers who are often on the move. Both lenses are constructed with durable materials, but the 35mm lens's lightweight design may make it easier to carry for extended periods. For those prioritizing portability, the 35mm lens is the clear winner.

Versatility for Different Photography Styles

The VILTROX 16mm F1.8 FE excels in capturing wide landscapes and interiors, while the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E offers versatility for a broader range of photography styles. The 35mm lens is suitable for portraits, street photography, and even landscapes, providing a natural perspective that many photographers prefer. On the other hand, the 16mm lens is specifically designed for wide-angle shots, making it less versatile overall. If you need a lens that can adapt to various shooting scenarios, the 35mm lens is the more suitable option.

Additional Features

The VILTROX 16mm F1.8 FE comes with a smart LCD display that allows for quick access to shooting parameters, enhancing the shooting experience. Additionally, it features an inner focus optical structure for improved image quality. The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E, while lacking an LCD display, compensates with thoughtful design elements like a USB-C upgrade port for firmware updates and a compact lens hood for better image contrast. Both lenses have unique features that cater to different user preferences, making the choice between them dependent on the specific needs of the photographer.

Which should you buy?

If you're focused on budget, portability, and versatility, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E is the clear choice due to its lower price of $179.00 and lightweight design. However, if wide-angle photography and advanced autofocus capabilities are your primary concerns, the VILTROX 16mm F1.8 FE, despite its higher price of $580.00, may be worth the investment. Ultimately, your choice should depend on your specific photography needs and budget constraints.