VILTROX vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — VILTROX wins on aperture, VILTROX wins on weight and focal length.
The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji offers better low-light performance and versatility, making it the preferred choice for many photographers.
Why VILTROX is better
Lightweight
The 20mm lens is lighter at 173g.
Wide Angle
The 20mm lens provides a wider field of view.
Compact
The 20mm lens is more portable for travel.
Why VILTROX is better
Low Light
The 35mm lens has a larger aperture of f/1.7.
Close Focus
The 35mm lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.33m.
Versatility
The 35mm lens is better for portraits and street photography.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | VILTROX | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus | Fast, near-silent | Fast, STM motor |
| Image Quality | Crisp, clear | Outstanding, minimal aberrations |
| Build Quality | Compact, lightweight | Solid with lens hood |
| Price | $176.00 | $179.00 |
| Compatibility | Nikon Z mount | Fujifilm X mount |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the VILTROX 20mm F2.8 Z-Mount and VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji
The VILTROX 20mm F2.8 Z-Mount and the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji are both high-quality prime lenses designed for different camera systems. The 20mm lens is specifically made for Nikon Z mount cameras, while the 35mm lens is tailored for Fujifilm X mount cameras. With prices of $176.00 and $179.00 respectively, they are closely priced, making it essential to consider their unique features and performance capabilities.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, the VILTROX 20mm F2.8 Z-Mount offers a compact and lightweight option at just 173 grams, making it ideal for quick and impromptu shoots. Its sleek build is complemented by a near-silent shutter sound, which enhances its usability in various environments. On the other hand, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji, while slightly heavier, is designed with thoughtful details such as an extended lens hood that helps improve image contrast and protect against stray light. Both lenses exhibit solid construction, but the 20mm lens's lightweight design may appeal more to those prioritizing portability.
Optical Performance
The optical performance of both lenses is impressive, but they cater to different photography styles. The VILTROX 20mm F2.8 features an optical structure of 10 elements in 8 groups, including 2 ED lenses and 2 aspherical lenses, guaranteeing crisp and clear images with minimal distortion. Conversely, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 incorporates 11 elements in 9 groups, which includes 2 High Refractive elements and 1 Extra-low Dispersion element, ensuring exceptional image quality with reduced chromatic aberrations and flare. If you're focused on expansive landscapes, the 20mm may be your best bet, while the 35mm excels in portrait and close-up photography.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
When it comes to aperture and low-light capabilities, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji stands out with a maximum aperture of f/1.7, allowing for beautiful background blur (bokeh) and excellent low-light performance. This feature makes it particularly well-suited for portraits and street photography. In contrast, the VILTROX 20mm F2.8 has a maximum aperture of f/2.8, which is still respectable but does not offer the same level of low-light versatility as the 35mm. Thus, if low-light shooting is critical to your photography, the 35mm lens is the better choice.
Autofocus Capabilities
Both lenses feature fast autofocus systems, but their technologies differ slightly. The VILTROX 20mm F2.8 is designed for quick, near-silent autofocus, making it suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects, while also supporting EXIF information transmission and USB upgrades. Meanwhile, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji boasts a new STM motor that not only ensures quick and precise autofocus but also minimizes focus breathing during video recording. This makes the 35mm lens particularly advantageous for videographers looking for smooth focus transitions.
Minimum Focus Distance
The minimum focusing distance is crucial for photographers who enjoy shooting close-ups. The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 offers a close focusing distance of just 0.33 meters (33cm), allowing for stunning detail in close-up shots. In comparison, the VILTROX 20mm F2.8 has a minimum focus distance of 0.62 feet (about 0.19 meters), which is adequate but not as versatile for macro photography as the 35mm. Consequently, for those who frequently shoot in close proximity to their subjects, the 35mm lens provides greater flexibility and detail.
Pricing Comparison
The pricing of these lenses is quite similar, with the VILTROX 20mm F2.8 retailing at $176.00 and the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji at $179.00. This results in a mere $3 difference, making the 20mm about 1.7% cheaper. While the price difference is minimal, the choice may come down to the specific features and performance that align with your photography needs rather than just cost.
User Experience and Versatility
Both lenses are designed to deliver exceptional user experience and versatility, but they cater to different styles of photography. The VILTROX 20mm F2.8 Z-Mount is ideal for landscape photographers and those looking for a wide-angle view with a compact, portable solution. In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji is versatile enough for a range of photography styles from portraits to street photography, while its larger aperture allows for creative depth-of-field effects. Depending on your photographic focus, one lens may serve your needs better than the other.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the VILTROX 20mm F2.8 Z-Mount and the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji will hinge on your camera system and specific photography needs. If you prefer a lightweight, wide-angle lens for landscapes and general photography, the 20mm is an excellent choice. However, if you require a lens with better low-light capabilities and versatility for portraits and close-ups, the 35mm is the superior option. Both lenses offer exceptional optical performance and fast autofocus, making either a solid addition to your photographic toolkit.