vsversusfinder

Viltrox vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — VILTROX leads on focal length and build quality.

Winner

Both lenses offer excellent performance, but the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF excels in portrait photography.

Why Viltrox is better

Price

The 25mm lens is $4 cheaper.

Weight

The 25mm lens is lighter at 170g.

Versatility

The 25mm lens is suitable for various shooting scenarios.

Why VILTROX is better

Optical Quality

The 56mm lens has a superior optical structure.

Bokeh

The 56mm lens provides better bokeh quality.

Focal Length

The 56mm lens offers an 85mm equivalent focal length.

Overall score

Viltrox
85
VILTROX
88

Specifications

SpecViltroxVILTROX
BrandVILTROXVILTROX
Max Aperturef/1.7f/1.7
Camera MountSony EFujifilm X
Weight170g171g
Optical StructureNot detailed9 groups, 11 pieces

Dimension comparison

ViltroxVILTROX

Overview of the Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E and VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF

The Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E and the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF are both excellent prime lenses designed for different camera systems. The 25mm model is tailored for Sony E mount cameras, while the 56mm is optimized for Fujifilm X mount cameras. Each lens offers unique advantages catering to specific photography styles and requirements.

The Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E is priced at $176.00, making it a versatile option for those looking for a lightweight lens that excels in low-light conditions. On the other hand, the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF is slightly more expensive at $180.00, providing a portrait-length focal length ideal for capturing stunning images with a beautiful depth of field.

Build Quality and Design

Both lenses feature a lightweight design, making them ideal for travel and everyday use. The Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E weighs only 170g, while the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF is just slightly heavier at 171g. This minimal difference in weight means that either lens can be easily carried around without adding significant bulk to your camera setup.

In terms of build quality, both lenses are constructed to be sturdy and durable, ensuring they can withstand regular usage. The 25mm variant boasts a compact design that is well compatible with various Sony mirrorless cameras, while the 56mm lens is designed to integrate seamlessly with Fujifilm’s line of X-mount cameras. Both lenses are equipped with an STM stepper motor, providing a quiet autofocus experience that is crucial for both photography and videography.

Optical Performance

Optical performance is one of the most crucial aspects of any lens, and both the Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E and VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF shine in this regard. The 25mm lens features a bright f/1.7 maximum aperture, allowing photographers to work effectively in low-light settings and achieve a shallow depth of field. Similarly, the 56mm lens also has a maximum aperture of f/1.7, which is beneficial for portrait photography, providing an 85mm equivalent focal length on APS-C cameras.

The VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF is engineered with a sophisticated optical structure consisting of 9 groups and 11 pieces, including 4 ED lenses and 3 high-refraction index lenses. This design contributes to enhanced image quality, reduced chromatic aberration, and superior bokeh, making it particularly appealing for portrait photographers. While the optical design specifics of the 25mm lens are not as detailed, its performance in low-light conditions and autofocus capabilities make it a strong competitor.

Autofocus and Usability

Autofocus functionality is crucial for both still photography and video work, and both lenses leverage an STM stepper motor for quiet and efficient autofocus. The Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E supports face and eye recognition, which is particularly useful for portrait shooters and videographers, ensuring that subjects are always in focus regardless of movement.

Similarly, the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF also provides a reliable autofocus experience and incorporates an integrated micro-USB port for firmware updates, allowing for ongoing improvements and enhancements. This feature is especially beneficial for users who want to keep their lens up-to-date with the latest performance tweaks, providing an edge in competitive shooting situations.

Price Comparison

When comparing prices, the Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E comes in at $176.00, while the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF is priced at $180.00. This makes the 25mm lens about 2% cheaper than its Fuji counterpart. While the price difference is minimal, it may influence buyers on a budget. However, it's important to consider how each lens fits into your shooting style and camera system, as the slight cost disparity may not outweigh the specific benefits offered by each lens.

Target Audience

The Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E is an excellent choice for photographers who primarily use Sony E mount cameras and are looking for a versatile lens suitable for a variety of shooting scenarios, including street photography and everyday use. Its lightweight design and effective low-light performance make it ideal for casual shooters and travel enthusiasts.

On the other hand, the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF is tailored for Fujifilm users who focus on portrait photography, thanks to its 85mm equivalent focal length and superior optical quality. This makes it ideal for capturing stunning portraits with beautiful bokeh and depth of field. Both lenses cater to different needs, making it essential to consider your camera system and shooting preferences.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E and the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF ultimately depends on your camera system and photographic needs. If you own a Sony E mount camera and seek a lightweight, versatile lens for various shooting situations, the 25mm is a fantastic choice, especially given its lower price of $176.00. Conversely, if you shoot with Fujifilm X mount cameras and focus on portrait photography, the 56mm lens provides superior optical performance and is worth the slightly higher investment of $180.00. Both lenses are exceptional in their own right, so your decision should reflect your specific requirements and preferences in photography.