Viltrox vs YONGNUO YN35mm F2 Lens 1:2 AF/MF Wide-Angle
Updated July 2026 — Viltrox wins on weight and aperture, YONGNUO YN35mm F2 Lens 1:2 AF/MF Wide-Angle wins on price.
The Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E excels in low-light performance and portability, while the YONGNUO YN35mm F2 offers a more budget-friendly option with decent features.
Why Viltrox is better
Aperture
Viltrox has a wider maximum aperture of f/1.7.
Weight
Viltrox is lighter at 170g.
Autofocus
Viltrox features near-silent autofocus.
Why YONGNUO YN35mm F2 Lens 1:2 AF/MF Wide-Angle is better
Price
YONGNUO is cheaper at $106.
Focusing Modes
YONGNUO supports both AF and MF modes.
Build
YONGNUO has a chrome metal bayonet for durability.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Viltrox | YONGNUO YN35mm F2 Lens 1:2 AF/MF Wide-Angle |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/1.7 | f/2 |
| Weight | 170g | unknown |
| Focusing Modes | AF | AF/MF |
| Mount Type | Sony E | Canon EF |
| Minimum Focus | 0.25m | 0.25m |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E and YONGNUO YN35mm F2
When comparing the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E and the YONGNUO YN35mm F2, the most striking difference is in their price points and intended mount compatibility. The Viltrox lens is priced at $179.00, while the YONGNUO offers a more budget-friendly option at $106.00, making it about 17% cheaper. This price difference may be a significant factor for those looking to save while still acquiring a quality lens for their photography needs.
Build Quality and Design
The build quality of the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E is designed with a lightweight structure, weighing only 170g. This makes it particularly appealing for travel and daily use, as it pairs well with Sony E-mount mirrorless cameras. In contrast, the YONGNUO YN35mm F2 also boasts a solid design, featuring a chrome high precision metal bayonet which enhances durability and ensures a good fit with Canon EF mount cameras. Both lenses are constructed with glass elements, but the Viltrox’s lightweight design gives it an edge for those prioritizing portability.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
A critical factor in lens performance is their aperture capabilities. The Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E offers a bright maximum aperture of f/1.7, which excels in low-light conditions and allows for more control over depth of field. This is particularly beneficial for portrait and street photography. On the other hand, the YONGNUO YN35mm F2 has a maximum aperture of f/2, which, while still decent, doesn’t quite match the low-light prowess of the Viltrox. The wider aperture of the Viltrox may attract photographers who frequently shoot in dim environments or desire more creative depth of field effects.
Focusing Capabilities
Focusing performance is another essential aspect to consider when comparing these two lenses. The Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E features near-silent autofocus, which is a significant advantage for videographers or those shooting portraits where sound can be disruptive. It also supports EXIF information transmission for enhanced usability. Conversely, the YONGNUO YN35mm F2 supports both auto focus (AF) and manual focus (MF) modes, providing flexibility for different shooting situations. However, it lacks the advanced silent focusing capabilities of the Viltrox, which may be a consideration for users prioritizing stealthy operation.
Versatility in Photography
Versatility is a strong point for both lenses, but they cater to slightly different photographers. The Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E is marketed as a prime portrait-length lens that also performs well in landscape and street photography, making it suitable for a variety of creative needs. The YONGNUO YN35mm F2, while also a wide-angle lens, is noted for its excellent optical performance and ability to create a natural wide-angle effect even at a close minimum focusing distance of 0.25m (0.8ft). Both lenses offer versatility, but the Viltrox’s wider aperture may give it an edge in creative flexibility.
Price and Value for Money
The price difference between the two lenses is notable, with the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E priced at $179.00 compared to the YONGNUO YN35mm F2 at $106.00. This 17% lower price for the YONGNUO lens might appeal to amateur photographers or those on a budget who still want a quality lens for their Canon EF mount cameras. However, the additional features and performance offered by the Viltrox may justify its higher price for more serious photographers looking for longevity and versatility in their gear.
User Experience and Feedback
While specific user feedback is not provided in the data, one can infer that a lens's design and features heavily impact user experience. The Viltrox lens’s lightweight design and silent autofocus capabilities suggest a user-friendly experience, especially for those who might frequently change shooting environments. On the other hand, the YONGNUO lens, with its dual focusing modes and robust build, likely serves well for those who enjoy hands-on control over their photography. Both lenses cater to different preferences, indicating that user experience will significantly depend on individual shooting styles.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E and the YONGNUO YN35mm F2 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize low-light performance, portability, and a silent autofocus system, the Viltrox lens represents a solid investment at $179.00. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that still offers good optical performance for a Canon EF mount camera, the YONGNUO lens at $106.00 would be a practical choice. Consider your photography style, the camera system you are using, and how much you are willing to invest to make the best choice for your needs.

