vsversusfinder

VILTROX vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — VILTROX leads on price and weight.

Winner

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 offers better low-light performance and artistic bokeh, while the 50mm F2 excels in optical quality for portraiture. Choose based on your photography needs.

Why VILTROX is better

Price

35mm is $20 cheaper

Aperture

35mm has a wider aperture (F1.7 vs F2)

Portability

35mm is lighter (170g vs 205g)

Why VILTROX is better

Optical Quality

50mm has a more complex optical structure

Close-Up Performance

50mm has a better minimum focusing distance

Standard Focal Length

50mm is ideal for portraiture

Overall score

VILTROX
85
VILTROX
78

Specifications

SpecVILTROXVILTROX
AutofocusEfficient STMFast and quiet
BokehDreamy effectSmooth background
Firmware UpgradeYesNo
Minimum Focus0.3m0.51m
Ideal UseVersatilePortraits

Dimension comparison

VILTROXVILTROX

Overview of the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 and VILTROX 50mm F2 Lenses

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is priced at $179.00, while the VILTROX 50mm F2 is available for $199.00, making the 35mm lens about 10% cheaper. Both lenses cater to Sony E-mount camera users, but they serve different needs in photography. The 35mm lens offers a wider aperture, which can create more pronounced bokeh effects, while the 50mm lens provides a standard focal length that is often preferred for portraits. Understanding the strengths of each lens will help you decide which is best for your shooting style.

Aperture and Depth of Field

When it comes to aperture, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 has a larger maximum aperture of F1.7 compared to the F2 aperture of the VILTROX 50mm. The larger aperture of the 35mm lens allows for better low-light performance and the ability to achieve a more pronounced depth of field, resulting in beautiful background blur. This feature is particularly advantageous for portrait and artistic photography, where subject isolation is key. The 9 aperture blades of the 35mm lens contribute to this effect, producing a dreamy bokeh that enhances the visual appeal.

Autofocus Capabilities

Both lenses utilize a Stepping Motor (STM) for autofocus, but the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 claims to offer efficient and reliable autofocus with support for eye and face AF. This can be particularly beneficial for photographers who need quick and precise focusing, especially in dynamic shooting environments. The 50mm lens also boasts fast and quiet autofocus, making it ideal for video recording as well. However, the 35mm lens may have the edge for those specifically looking for enhanced tracking capabilities.

Optical Quality

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 features an optical structure of 11 elements in 9 groups, including special elements designed to reduce aberrations and improve clarity. On the other hand, the VILTROX 50mm F2 has a 9-group, 13-element structure that includes 3 ED elements and 4 high refractive (HR) elements. While both lenses are designed to deliver excellent image quality, the complexity of the optical design in the 50mm may provide slightly superior performance in terms of sharpness and color accuracy, especially for full-frame cameras.

Weight and Portability

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is lightweight at 170 g, making it a convenient option for photographers on the go. In contrast, the VILTROX 50mm F2 weighs 205 g, which is still relatively lightweight but slightly heavier than its 35mm counterpart. For those who prioritize portability, the 35mm lens may be the better choice, particularly for travel or street photography where quick setups and ease of carrying gear are essential.

Versatility in Shooting Scenarios

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 excels in a variety of shooting scenarios, from landscapes to street photography, thanks to its wide aperture and focal length. Meanwhile, the VILTROX 50mm F2 is particularly well-suited for portraiture, owing to its standard focal length that closely resembles the human eye's perspective. Both lenses are versatile, but the choice largely depends on the type of photography you engage in most frequently. If you often find yourself shooting in low-light situations or require artistic bokeh, the 35mm is ideal. For general-purpose and portrait photography, the 50mm would likely serve you better.

Firmware and Future-Proofing

One notable feature of the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is its micro USB interface at the bottom of the lens, allowing for convenient firmware upgrades. This feature can enhance the lens's performance over time as new updates are released. The 50mm lens does not mention a similar upgrade capability, which could be a consideration for photographers who wish to maintain the best possible performance in their equipment. Therefore, if adaptability and longevity are important to you, the 35mm lens has a distinct advantage.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 and the VILTROX 50mm F2 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a photographer. The 35mm lens is about 10% cheaper and offers a wider aperture for enhanced low-light performance and bokeh, making it a great choice for creative shooting. Conversely, the 50mm lens is designed with full-frame cameras in mind and provides superb optical quality with excellent close-up performance, making it ideal for portrait work. If versatility and portability are your priorities, the 35mm may be the better option. However, if you’re focused on portraiture and want a standard focal length, the 50mm could be worth the extra cost.