VILTROX vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — VILTROX leads on focal length and weight.
Both lenses offer excellent performance, but the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 excels in portrait photography.
Why VILTROX is better
Wide Angle
Ideal for street photography and landscapes.
Weight
Slightly lighter at 170g.
Price
Cheaper by $1.
Why VILTROX is better
Portraits
Better for capturing stunning portraits.
Optical Design
More ED lenses for improved clarity.
Bokeh
Superior subject isolation with longer focal length.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | VILTROX | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | VILTROX | VILTROX |
| Max Aperture | F1.7 | F1.7 |
| Autofocus | STM | STM |
| Bokeh Blades | 9 | 9 |
| ED Lenses | 1 | 4 |
| Use Case | General | Portraits |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 and VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Lenses
The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 and VILTROX 56mm F1.7 are two impressive prime lenses designed for different camera mounts, catering to distinct photographic needs. The former is tailored for Sony E-Mount cameras, while the latter is crafted for Fujifilm X-Mount systems. Priced at $179.00 and $180.00 respectively, these lenses offer similar features but serve different purposes depending on your camera brand and usage.
The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is ideal for wide-angle shots, making it great for street photography and landscapes. Conversely, the VILTROX 56mm F1.7, with its portrait-length focal length, excels in capturing stunning portraits with a beautiful bokeh effect. Both lenses are lightweight, making them excellent choices for on-the-go photographers.
Design and Build Quality
Both lenses boast a lightweight design, crucial for travel and everyday use. The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 weighs in at 170 grams, while the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 is slightly heavier at 171 grams. This minimal weight difference is negligible, so both lenses are easy to carry around during long shooting sessions.
In terms of build quality, both lenses feature an optical structure with 11 elements in 9 groups. However, the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 incorporates additional ED lenses and high refractive index elements, which may enhance image clarity and minimize chromatic aberration. Both lenses also include a micro USB port for firmware updates, ensuring longevity in performance.
Aperture Performance
The aperture performance of both lenses is comparable, with each featuring a maximum aperture of F1.7. This large aperture allows for impressive low-light capabilities and greater control over depth of field, which is beneficial for isolating subjects against a pleasing blurred background.
While both lenses offer a nine-blade diaphragm for beautiful bokeh, the VILTROX 56mm F1.7's portrait-length design may provide superior subject isolation when shooting at wide apertures. This could make it the preferred choice for portrait photographers who aim to achieve that coveted creamy background effect.
Autofocus Capabilities
When it comes to autofocus, both lenses utilize a stepping motor (STM) that provides efficient and reliable focus tracking. The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is particularly noted for its eye and face tracking capabilities, which can enhance portrait and candid photography.
On the other hand, the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 also delivers quiet autofocus, making it suitable for both photography and videography. If you require silent operation for video shoots, the 56mm may have a slight edge, though both lenses perform admirably in autofocus tasks.
Image Quality
Image quality is a critical aspect of any lens, and both the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 and VILTROX 56mm F1.7 deliver impressive results. The 35mm lens’s optical design includes one ED lens and two high refractive index lenses, which contribute to sharpness and color accuracy.
On the flip side, the 56mm lens features four ED lenses and three high refractive index elements, which could offer even better control over aberrations and improved sharpness, especially at wider apertures. Photographers looking for maximum image quality in their portraits might find the 56mm to be more suitable.
Use Cases
The intended use cases for these lenses differ significantly. The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is versatile, ideal for street photography, landscapes, and general photography where a wider field of view is desired. Its focal length allows for capturing more of the scene, making it a great all-around lens.
Conversely, the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 specializes in portraiture, providing an equivalent focal length of about 85mm on APS-C sensors. This makes it perfect for capturing stunning portraits with a flattering perspective and beautiful bokeh. Choosing between these two lenses will largely depend on whether you need a wider or narrower field of view for your photographic style.
Price Comparison
With the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 priced at $179.00 and the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 at $180.00, the price difference is minimal, with the 35mm being about $1 cheaper. This slight difference is unlikely to be a decisive factor for most photographers, but it still highlights the competitive pricing of both lenses within the market.
Given that both lenses are from the same brand and share many features, the pricing reflects their unique specifications and intended use cases. When considering budget, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 offers a slightly lower entry point, but the choice should be based more on the desired focal length and application rather than cost alone.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 and VILTROX 56mm F1.7 ultimately comes down to your specific photography needs and the camera system you own. If you’re looking for a versatile lens that performs well in various scenarios, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is an excellent choice, especially for capturing wider scenes. However, if your focus is primarily on portrait photography, the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 will likely serve you better with its longer focal length and enhanced bokeh capabilities. Both lenses are solid investments, offering exceptional image quality and performance for their respective mounts.

