vsversusfinder

VILTROX vs VILTROX AF

Updated July 2026 — VILTROX wins on elements and focus dist., VILTROX AF wins on price and weight.

Winner

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 offers excellent value for budget-conscious photographers, while the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z provides advanced features for professionals.

Why VILTROX is better

Price

35mm is $401 cheaper than 16mm

Weight

35mm weighs 170g, lighter than 16mm

Portability

35mm is more compact for casual use

Why VILTROX AF is better

Optical Quality

16mm has superior optical elements

Autofocus

16mm features faster and quieter autofocus

Build Quality

16mm has a full metal body for durability

Overall score

VILTROX
75
VILTROX AF
85

Specifications

SpecVILTROXVILTROX AF
BrandVILTROXVILTROX
TypePrimePrime
MountSony ENikon Z
BokehGoodExcellent
DisplayNoYes

Dimension comparison

VILTROXVILTROX AF

Overview of the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 and VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is priced at $179.00, making it a budget-friendly option for those with Sony E-Mount cameras. In contrast, the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z, which retails for $580.00, targets Nikon Z-Mount users. This price difference is significant, with the 35mm lens being about 69% cheaper than its competitor.

Design and Build Quality

Both lenses are designed with portability in mind, but they cater to different preferences. The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 weighs just 170 grams, making it lightweight and easy to carry for spontaneous shooting. On the other hand, the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z is slightly heavier at 19.5 ounces, but it boasts a full metal body, suggesting durability and a premium feel. While the 35mm lens is compact, the 16mm lens includes a lens hood for added protection, which may appeal to photographers who prioritize build quality.

Aperture and Bokeh Performance

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 features a large aperture of F1.7, allowing photographers to create beautiful natural bokeh with its nine aperture blades. This capability effectively highlights the subject against a dreamy blurred background. In contrast, the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z has a slightly larger aperture of F1.8, which also enables exquisite background bokeh. However, it employs three aspherical elements and four ED glass elements to ensure outstanding image quality and suppress color bleeding across the frame. Both lenses excel in bokeh performance but achieve it through different optical designs.

Autofocus Capabilities

When it comes to autofocus, both lenses are equipped with advanced systems, but they differ in technology. The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 utilizes a built-in STM stepping motor for precise autofocus, which is particularly effective for eye and face detection. This makes it responsive and minimizes latency during shooting. The VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z features fast, precise, and quiet autofocus, with a minimum focus distance of just 0.88 feet, allowing for dynamic close-ups combined with expansive backgrounds. While both lenses support autofocus, the 16mm lens appears to have a slight edge in versatility due to its close-focusing capability.

Optical Design

The optical design of the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 consists of 11 elements arranged in 9 groups, including one ED lens and one aspherical lens, complemented by high-definition multi-layer coating. This structure aims to enhance image quality and minimize aberrations. In comparison, the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z's optical system boasts three aspherical elements and four ED glass elements, which work together to achieve exceptional corner-to-corner resolution. The difference in optical complexity may appeal to photographers who prioritize image fidelity, particularly in challenging lighting conditions.

Compatibility and Use Cases

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is designed for an extensive range of Sony E-Mount cameras, including models like the FX3, A7C, and A6400. This broad compatibility makes it a versatile choice for Sony users. Conversely, the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z is tailored for Nikon Z-Mount mirrorless cameras, accommodating models such as the Z9, Z8, and Z7. While both lenses cater to their respective ecosystems, the 35mm may appeal more to casual photographers seeking a lightweight option for everyday use, while the 16mm is ideal for those who desire a robust, ultra-wide-angle lens for creative shooting.

Price and Value Proposition

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is priced at $179.00, which is significantly lower than the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z's price of $580.00. This price gap of $401 means that the 35mm lens is an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers looking for quality performance without the hefty price tag. The 16mm lens, while more expensive, offers advanced features such as a built-in LCD display and superior optical elements that may justify the higher cost for professional photographers.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 and the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z ultimately depends on your specific needs and camera system. If you are a Sony E-Mount user seeking a lightweight, budget-friendly lens with excellent bokeh performance, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is an outstanding choice. However, if you own a Nikon Z-Mount camera and require a high-quality ultra-wide-angle lens with advanced optical technology and exceptional autofocus capabilities, the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z may be worth the investment.