VILTROX vs VILTROX AF
Updated July 2026 — VILTROX wins on value, VILTROX AF wins on autofocus and weight.
The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is a budget-friendly option ideal for general photography, while the VILTROX AF 50mm F1.4 excels in low-light performance and sharpness.
Why VILTROX is better
Price
35mm lens is significantly cheaper at $179.
Weight
35mm lens is lighter at 170g.
Portability
35mm lens is more compact for travel.
Why VILTROX AF is better
Aperture
50mm lens has a larger maximum aperture of F1.4.
Sharpness
50mm lens maintains sharpness at full aperture.
Autofocus
50mm lens has faster and quieter autofocus.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | VILTROX | VILTROX AF |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | F1.7 | F1.4 |
| Min Focus Dist. | 0.3m | 0.45m |
| Elements | 11 in 9 | 10 in 8 |
| Autofocus Type | STM | HyperVCM |
| Video Performance | Good | Excellent |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 and VILTROX AF 50mm F1.4
The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is priced at $179.00, making it significantly more budget-friendly than the VILTROX AF 50mm F1.4, which costs $549.00. The price difference of $370 indicates that the 35mm lens is about 62% cheaper, making it an attractive option for photographers looking for quality without breaking the bank.
The 35mm lens features a large aperture of F1.7, which is ideal for creating a beautiful bokeh effect, while the 50mm lens offers an even larger maximum aperture of F1.4, excelling in low-light conditions. Each lens caters to different photographic needs, with the 35mm lens being more suitable for general photography and the 50mm lens being geared towards portraiture and low-light performance.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
When it comes to aperture and low-light capabilities, the VILTROX AF 50mm F1.4 excels with its maximum aperture of F1.4. This larger aperture allows for exceptional low-light performance, making it a top choice for capturing stunning portraits with beautiful background blur.
In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7, while still effective with its F1.7 aperture, does not quite match the 50mm lens's ability to gather light. This difference, although only a fraction, can be crucial in challenging lighting conditions where every bit of light matters. If low-light performance is critical to your photography, the 50mm lens might be the better option.
Autofocus Capabilities
The autofocus systems of both lenses are impressive but cater to slightly different needs. The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 features efficient and reliable autofocus powered by a built-in STM stepping motor. This system supports eye and face AF, providing precise tracking for moving subjects.
On the other hand, the VILTROX AF 50mm F1.4 boasts a quick and quiet autofocus system, ideal for real-time subject tracking. With a minimum focusing distance of just 0.45m, it also offers excellent macro capabilities. If you prioritize speed and quiet operation, particularly for video shooting, the 50mm lens may be more suitable for your needs.
Optical Quality and Sharpness
Optical quality is a major consideration for photographers, and both lenses deliver impressive results. The VILTROX AF 50mm F1.4 maintains outstanding sharpness even at its maximum aperture, with consistent clarity from the center to the edges of the frame.
In comparison, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 features an optical structure of 11 elements in 9 groups, which includes specialized lenses for enhanced image quality. While both lenses are built to deliver high-quality images, the 50mm lens stands out for its ability to capture intricate details in various shooting conditions, making it a preferred choice for portraiture and detailed work.
Build Quality and Design
In terms of design, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is lightweight at 170g, allowing for easy portability, which is particularly advantageous for spontaneous shooting scenarios. Its compact design enables photographers to carry it effortlessly, making it a favorite for outdoor and travel photography.
The VILTROX AF 50mm F1.4, while heavier and more robust, is designed with professional use in mind. The additional weight often comes with increased durability, which may be essential for rigorous use. If you need a lens for everyday carry and casual shooting, the 35mm lens is likely the better choice, while the 50mm lens is aimed at professionals who require superior build quality.
Video Performance
For videographers, the performance of a lens during recording can be just as important as its photographic capabilities. The VILTROX AF 50mm F1.4 shines in this area, offering outstanding optical performance that translates well to video shooting. It minimizes the breathing effect during focus changes, ensuring a smooth visual experience without distracting shifts in the frame.
The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 also performs adequately for video, but the specialized features of the 50mm lens make it the superior choice for filmmakers looking for high-quality video output. If you plan to shoot a significant amount of video, the 50mm lens is likely the better investment.
Price Comparison
The price difference between these two lenses is substantial. The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is available for $179.00, while the VILTROX AF 50mm F1.4 is priced at $549.00. This makes the 35mm lens about 62% cheaper than its 50mm counterpart.
For those on a budget or just starting in photography, the 35mm lens offers excellent value without sacrificing quality. However, if your work demands the advanced features of the 50mm lens, the investment may be justified.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 and the VILTROX AF 50mm F1.4 depends on your specific needs as a photographer or videographer. If you are looking for a budget-friendly option that excels in portability and general shooting, the 35mm F1.7 is an excellent choice.
On the other hand, if you require superior low-light performance, exceptional sharpness, and advanced autofocus capabilities, the 50mm F1.4 may be worth the higher price tag. Consider your shooting style and requirements carefully before making a decision, as both lenses offer unique advantages tailored to different photographic applications.

