vsversusfinder

VILTROX vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — VILTROX wins on min focus and build quality, VILTROX wins on focal length and portability.

Winner

The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji lens offers greater versatility and close-up capabilities, while the VILTROX 56mm f/1.7 E Lens excels in portrait photography. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why VILTROX is better

Close Focus

0.33m minimum focusing distance for detailed close-ups

Versatility

Better suited for various photography styles

Price

$1 cheaper than the 56mm lens

Why VILTROX is better

Portrait Quality

85mm full-frame equivalent for flattering portraits

Lightweight

Compact design at 170g

Video Performance

Low distortion and breathing for video shooting

Overall score

VILTROX
85
VILTROX
80

Specifications

SpecVILTROXVILTROX
AutofocusFast STMEfficient STM
Optical Design11 elements11 elements
BokehExcellentGood
Video UseLow BreathingReliable
Price$179$180

Dimension comparison

VILTROXVILTROX

Introduction to VILTROX Lenses

The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji and the VILTROX 56mm f/1.7 E Lens for Sony are two versatile lenses designed for different camera systems, each offering unique capabilities. The 35mm lens is priced at $179.00, while the 56mm lens comes in slightly higher at $180.00. This article will delve into various aspects of both lenses, from design and build quality to autofocus capabilities and overall performance.

Design and Build Quality

Both lenses showcase VILTROX's commitment to quality and functionality, though they are tailored for different camera systems. The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 is designed for Fujifilm X mount cameras and features an extended lens hood to enhance contrast while protecting against stray light. The lens weighs significantly less than many alternatives, enhancing portability.

In contrast, the VILTROX 56mm f/1.7 E is designed for Sony cameras and is compact and lightweight at just 170 grams. This makes it an excellent option for photographers on the go. Both lenses feature a modern aesthetic, though the 56mm’s design is optimized for portraiture, providing a flattering perspective that is equivalent to 85mm in full-frame terms.

Aperture Performance

A key differentiator between the two lenses is their aperture performance. The VILTROX 35mm boasts a bright f/1.7 aperture, enabling exceptional low-light shooting and creating beautiful bokeh, which is crucial for portrait and street photography. This feature allows photographers to achieve rich, creamy backgrounds while keeping the subject in sharp focus.

On the other hand, the VILTROX 56mm also features an f/1.7 aperture, which is equally beneficial for low-light situations and portrait photography. The lens’s full-frame equivalent focal length of about 85mm makes it particularly suited for capturing stunning portraits with depth and dimension. Both lenses excel in low-light environments, yet their focal lengths cater to different photographic styles.

Autofocus Capabilities

When it comes to autofocus, both lenses are equipped with advanced technologies to ensure quick and reliable performance. The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 features a new STM motor that delivers fast, precise, and near-silent autofocus, which is ideal for both stills and video. This ensures minimal focus breathing, providing smooth transitions during video recording.

The VILTROX 56mm f/1.7 also employs an efficient STM silent motor, enabling fast and accurate autofocus. This makes the lens user-friendly, even for novices. While both lenses provide reliable autofocus, the 35mm lens emphasizes low focus breathing, making it particularly advantageous for videography.

Optical Quality

Optical performance is crucial for any lens, and both VILTROX offerings excel in this area. The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 features an optimized optical design with 11 elements in 9 groups, including high refractive and extra-low dispersion elements. This configuration minimizes chromatic aberrations, distortion, and flare, ensuring outstanding image quality across various shooting conditions.

Similarly, the VILTROX 56mm f/1.7 contains 11 optical elements arranged in 9 groups, including 4 ED lenses and 3 high-refractive-index lenses. This design also prioritizes low distortion and high clarity, making it an excellent choice for portraiture. Both lenses promise impressive optical quality, though the specific design elements cater to the intended use cases of each lens.

Minimum Focusing Distance

The minimum focusing distance is an important feature for photographers who enjoy close-up shots. The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 has a minimum focusing distance of just 0.33 meters (33 cm), allowing for stunning detail in close-up photography. This capability makes it versatile for various shooting scenarios, from macro shots to portraits.

In comparison, the VILTROX 56mm f/1.7 does not specify its minimum focusing distance but is generally not designed for extreme close-ups like the 35mm. Instead, it focuses on delivering exceptional portrait quality at a comfortable distance, making it less suited for detailed macro photography. For those focusing on close-up work, the 35mm lens has a clear advantage.

Price Comparison

When looking at the price points, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 is currently priced at $179.00, while the VILTROX 56mm f/1.7 is priced at $180.00. The difference is minimal, with the 35mm lens being about $1.00 cheaper, making it slightly more budget-friendly. However, considering the features and intended use of each lens, the price difference may not be a significant factor for most buyers.

Both lenses provide excellent value for their respective camera systems, but the choice may ultimately come down to the specific needs of the photographer. For example, those focused on street photography or close-ups might prefer the 35mm, while portrait photographers may find the 56mm more suitable.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, both the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji and the VILTROX 56mm f/1.7 E Lens for Sony offer exceptional features and performance, tailored to their respective camera systems. The 35mm lens stands out with its close focusing distance and versatility for a wide range of photography styles, while the 56mm lens excels in portrait capabilities and lightweight design. Your choice should reflect your specific photographic needs—whether you prioritize versatility and close-ups or a flattering portrait perspective.