Sigma 10- vs Canon RF 24-
Updated July 2026 — Sigma 10- wins on aperture, Canon RF 24- wins on stabilization and price.
The Sigma lens excels in low-light performance and ultra-wide capabilities, while the Canon lens offers versatility and image stabilization at a lower price.
Why Sigma 10- is better
Low Light
Sigma has a larger aperture (f/2.8) for better low-light performance.
Size
Sigma is the smallest and lightest ultra-wide-angle zoom lens.
Specialization
Sigma is tailored for landscapes and video content.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Versatility
Canon covers a wider focal length range (24-105mm).
Price
Canon is approximately 30% cheaper than Sigma.
Image Stabilization
Canon features built-in Optical Image Stabilizer.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Sigma 10- | Canon RF 24- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 10-18mm | 24-105mm |
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4-7.1 |
| Image Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Autofocus | Standard | STM |
| Weight | 0.5 lbs | 0.7 lbs |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the Sigma and Canon Lenses
When comparing the Sigma 10-18mm F2.8 DC DN and the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM, it's essential to understand their unique strengths and intended uses. The Sigma lens is designed for ultra-wide-angle photography, ideal for landscapes and video work, while the Canon lens offers a versatile zoom range suitable for everyday photography and casual video recording. With prices at $679.00 and $476.95 respectively, the Canon lens is about 30% cheaper than the Sigma option, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious photographers.
Design and Build Quality
The Sigma 10-18mm F2.8 DC DN is the world's smallest and lightest ultra-wide-angle zoom lens for APS-C cameras, emphasizing portability without sacrificing quality. In contrast, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM is also designed to be compact and lightweight, making it perfect for travel and everyday use. Both lenses feature robust designs that cater to the demands of photographers on the go, but the Sigma’s ultra-wide capability may appeal more to those focusing on landscape or architectural photography.
Optical Performance
The Sigma 10-18mm lens boasts a large aperture of f/2.8, which enhances its ability to perform well in low-light conditions, allowing for expressive imaging. On the other hand, the Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers a variable maximum aperture range of f/4-7.1, which, while versatile, may not perform as well in low-light situations compared to the Sigma. This difference in aperture specifications means that the Sigma lens is better suited for night photography or indoor shooting, where light may be limited.
Versatility and Range
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM excels in versatility, covering focal lengths from wide-angle to short telephoto. This makes it suitable for various photography styles, from landscapes to portraits, without the need to change lenses. In contrast, the Sigma 10-18mm F2.8 is limited to ultra-wide-angle shots, which may restrict its usability for everyday photography but is perfect for specific applications such as travel and video content creation. The Canon lens's broader range offers a flexibility that the Sigma lacks, making it appealing for those who prefer an all-in-one solution.
Image Stabilization and Autofocus
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens features a built-in Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to five stops of correction, enhancing sharpness and reducing camera shake while shooting handheld. This feature is particularly beneficial for low-light photography and video recording. The Sigma 10-18mm, while lacking built-in stabilization, compensates with its wide aperture for low-light performance. Additionally, the Canon's STM stepping motor ensures smooth and quiet autofocus, making it ideal for video recording. This aspect gives the Canon lens a significant edge for videographers needing reliable and unobtrusive autofocus.
Specific Use Cases
If you're primarily focused on landscapes, travel, or creating online content, the Sigma 10-18mm F2.8 DC DN is tailored for those needs with its ultra-wide perspective and large aperture. It’s particularly effective for creators who want to capture expansive scenes or dynamic video content. Conversely, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM is more suited for versatility in everyday photography, allowing users to capture a variety of subjects without changing lenses. This makes it a great option for families, travelers, and casual photographers who want a reliable all-around lens.
Price Comparison
The Sigma 10-18mm F2.8 DC DN is priced at $679.00, while the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM comes in at $476.95. This makes the Canon lens about 30% cheaper than the Sigma offering, providing significant savings for those looking for a versatile lens without breaking the bank. Given the performance and features of both lenses, the price difference could influence buyers, especially those who prioritize budget alongside functionality.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, choosing between the Sigma 10-18mm F2.8 DC DN and the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM largely depends on your specific photography needs. If you require an ultra-wide-angle lens for landscapes or video, the Sigma is a superior choice with its large aperture and compact design. However, if versatility and price are your primary concerns, the Canon lens offers a broader range of focal lengths and essential features like image stabilization, making it ideal for everyday photography. Ultimately, your decision should align with your shooting style and budget, ensuring you select the lens that best complements your creative pursuits.

