vsversusfinder

Sennheiser 3 Sennheiser E604 Dynamic Cardioid Instrument vs Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone

Updated August 2026 — Sennheiser 3 Sennheiser E604 Dynamic Cardioid Instrument wins on accessories and sound, Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone wins on price and versatility.

The Sennheiser E604 excels in instrument capture, while the Electro-Voice RE320 offers versatility for various recording applications.

Why Sennheiser 3 Sennheiser E604 Dynamic Cardioid Instrument is better

Sound Quality

Handles high sound pressure levels without distortion.

Accessories

Includes three microphones and cables.

Durability

Rugged design for live performances.

Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better

Price

Lower price point at $315.

Versatility

Dual EQ switch for various applications.

Weight

Lighter for easier handling.

Overall score

Sennheiser 3 Sennheiser E604 Dynamic Cardioid Instrument
85
Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
78

Specifications

SpecSennheiser 3 Sennheiser E604 Dynamic Cardioid InstrumentElectro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
Frequency Response40 Hz - 18 kHz20 Hz - 20 kHz
Sales Rank4603476619
Included Cables30
EQ SwitchNoYes
Microphone TypeDynamicDynamic

Dimension comparison

Sennheiser 3 Sennheiser E604 Dynamic Cardioid InstrumentElectro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone

Overview of Sennheiser E604

The Sennheiser E604 Dynamic Cardioid Instrument Microphone Kit is a robust choice for musicians and sound engineers alike. Priced at $429.00, this kit includes three dynamic microphones, drum rim clips, and mic pouches, making it ideal for live performances and studio recordings. It boasts a sales rank of 46,034, indicating its popularity in the market.

This microphone is specifically designed to handle high sound pressure levels, making it suitable for drums, percussion, and even brass instruments. It captures a wide frequency range from 40 Hz to 18 kHz, ensuring that the sound remains clear and undistorted even at sound pressure levels exceeding 160 dB. The inclusion of three 20ft XLR mic cables adds further value, making it a comprehensive kit for any musician.

Overview of Electro-Voice RE320

The Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone offers a different approach, focusing on versatility and sound quality. At a price of $315.00, it is about 26% cheaper than the Sennheiser E604. With a sales rank of 76,619, it caters to a diverse audience, including podcasters and musicians alike.

This microphone features a unique two-position "Dual Personality" frequency response switch, allowing users to choose between a flat response and a tailored kick drum EQ. This makes the RE320 particularly well-suited for recording instruments such as vocals, horns, and various amplifiers. The integrated humbucking coil minimizes unwanted buzz and hum, enhancing overall sound quality, particularly in live settings.

Sound Quality Comparison

In terms of sound quality, both microphones excel in their respective domains. The Sennheiser E604 is tailored for high sound pressure levels, making it ideal for loud instruments like drums, where distortion can be an issue. Its frequency response of 40 Hz to 18 kHz allows for a broad range of sound capture, which is crucial for dynamic performances.

On the other hand, the Electro-Voice RE320 offers a specialized EQ switch that allows users to adapt the microphone’s frequency response for different applications. This feature is particularly useful for achieving a punchy kick drum sound, which is a significant advantage for recording bass-heavy music. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the primary use case—live performance versus studio recording.

Build Quality and Durability

Both microphones are built to withstand the rigors of professional use, but they serve slightly different purposes that may affect their durability in varied settings. The Sennheiser E604 is ruggedly designed, specifically for instruments, which means it can handle the physical demands of live performances without compromising sound quality.

The Electro-Voice RE320 is also constructed with durability in mind, featuring an integrated humbucking coil that not only reduces noise but also adds to the microphone's longevity. Given that both products are well-regarded, users can expect reliable performance over time, but the Sennheiser may have an edge in rougher environments due to its specific design for instrument capture.

Versatility in Use

When it comes to versatility, the Electro-Voice RE320 shines with its ability to adapt to various recording settings. Its dual EQ switch allows it to handle both general instrument recording and specialized kick drum applications, making it a multi-functional tool for any audio engineer.

Conversely, the Sennheiser E604 is more focused on instrument capture, particularly for drums and percussion. While it can still be used in various settings, it is not as adaptable as the RE320. In this respect, if you require a microphone for a range of applications, the RE320 may be the better choice.

Accessories and Value

The Sennheiser E604 kit includes three microphones, drum rim clips, and three 20ft XLR mic cables, providing substantial value for $429.00. This complete package is particularly appealing for drummers or bands that require multiple microphones for live performances or recording sessions.

In contrast, the Electro-Voice RE320 is sold as a standalone microphone, which may necessitate additional purchases for cables or mounting solutions. While it is priced lower at $315.00, potential buyers should consider the overall cost when factoring in the need for extra accessories. The Sennheiser kit offers more immediate value for users needing multiple mics.

Intended Use and Application

Each microphone caters to different audiences and applications. The Sennheiser E604 is specifically designed for instruments, making it an excellent choice for drummers and percussionists looking for a reliable mic that can handle loud sound levels without distortion. Its design and accessories cater directly to these needs.

On the other hand, the Electro-Voice RE320 is more suited for broadcast and studio applications, appealing to podcasters, vocalists, and musicians alike. Its ability to switch EQ responses makes it versatile for various recording situations. In this aspect, the intended application heavily influences which microphone might be the better choice for the user.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Sennheiser E604 and the Electro-Voice RE320 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you are focused on capturing high-quality sound from instruments, particularly drums, the Sennheiser E604, with its rugged design and comprehensive kit, is the way to go. However, if you are looking for versatility in vocal and instrument recording—especially for bass-heavy music—the Electro-Voice RE320 is a solid choice, offering adaptability at a lower price point. Consider your primary use case, budget, and the types of recordings you plan to make before making a decision.