vsversusfinder

ASUS TUF Gaming A520M vs GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX LGA 1700 ATX Motherboard,

Updated August 2026 — ASUS TUF Gaming A520M wins on price and aesthetics, GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX LGA 1700 ATX Motherboard, wins on connectivity and performance.

The GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX offers superior features and performance for Intel users, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS is a solid budget option for AMD users.

Why ASUS TUF Gaming A520M is better

Price

ASUS is significantly cheaper at $99.99.

Cooling

ASUS has effective cooling solutions.

Aesthetics

ASUS features customizable RGB lighting.

Why GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX LGA 1700 ATX Motherboard, is better

Performance

GIGABYTE supports latest Intel processors.

Connectivity

GIGABYTE offers PCIe 5.0 and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2.

Power Design

GIGABYTE has a robust 12+1+1 power phase.

Overall score

ASUS TUF Gaming A520M
75
GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX LGA 1700 ATX Motherboard,
85

Specifications

SpecASUS TUF Gaming A520MGIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX LGA 1700 ATX Motherboard,
SocketAMD AM4Intel LGA 1700
RAM TypeDDR4DDR5
M.2 Slots13
Wi-Fi802.11acWi-Fi 6E
Power Phases412+1+1

Dimension comparison

ASUS TUF Gaming A520MGIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX LGA 1700 ATX Motherboard,

Overview of ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS and GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX

The ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS is priced at $99.99, while the GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX is significantly more expensive at $159.99, making it about 60% pricier. This price difference is reflective of the features and capabilities each motherboard offers. The ASUS model is designed for AMD processors, supporting 3rd Gen Ryzen CPUs, whereas the GIGABYTE model is tailored for Intel's 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen CPUs, appealing to a different segment of gamers.

Performance and Compatibility

In terms of performance, the GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX supports Intel's latest 14th-gen processors, providing cutting-edge speed and efficiency. This motherboard is equipped with a robust power design featuring a 12+1+1 power phase configuration, ensuring stable performance under high loads. On the other hand, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS is optimized for AMD's Ryzen processors, enabling it to deliver solid performance for gaming and multitasking with its comprehensive cooling solutions. While both motherboards cater to high-performance needs, the choice largely depends on the user's preference for AMD or Intel CPUs.

Connectivity Options

The connectivity options differ significantly between the two motherboards. The GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX boasts next-generation features, including PCIe 5.0 support and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C, enhancing data transfer speeds and future-proofing the setup. Additionally, it offers Wi-Fi 6E and 2.5GbE Ethernet, ensuring fast and reliable online gaming experiences. Conversely, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS features 802.11ac Wi-Fi and a variety of video output options, including DisplayPort and HDMI. While both models provide essential connectivity, the GIGABYTE motherboard offers more advanced features for modern gaming needs.

Cooling Solutions

Cooling is a critical aspect of motherboard performance, and both brands have taken different approaches. The ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS includes a large VRM heatsink and PCH heatsink, alongside Fan Xpert 2+ for enhanced thermal management. This setup ensures that the motherboard remains cool during intense gaming sessions. The GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX, however, features an advanced thermal design with enlarged MOSFET heatsinks and M.2 Thermal Guards, which are crucial for maintaining optimal temperatures during extended use. While both motherboards provide adequate cooling solutions, the GIGABYTE model appears to offer a more comprehensive cooling approach.

Aesthetics and Design

When it comes to aesthetics, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS boasts exclusive Aura Sync RGB lighting, enhancing the visual appeal of gaming rigs. This model allows users to customize lighting effects with addressable RGB headers, adding a personal touch to builds. On the other hand, the GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX also incorporates RGB Fusion, allowing for customizable RGB lighting effects. Both models cater to gamers looking to showcase their setups; however, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS stands out for its military-grade components and overall rugged design, appealing to users seeking durability alongside aesthetics.

Price and Value

The ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS is currently priced at $99.99, which is approximately $60 less than the GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX at $159.99. For budget-conscious gamers, the ASUS model presents a strong value proposition, especially considering its solid performance with AMD processors. However, the GIGABYTE model’s higher price reflects its advanced features and compatibility with the latest Intel processors, potentially justifying the investment for users looking for cutting-edge technology. The decision ultimately hinges on budget constraints and specific performance needs.

User Experience and Features

In terms of user experience, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS offers a straightforward setup with user-friendly features like a BIOS FlashBack button and multiple USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A ports. These features enhance the gaming experience, making it easier to manage and upgrade systems. The GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX, with its Q-Flash and EZ-Latch technology, also focuses on user-friendliness, allowing for easy BIOS updates and component installation. Both motherboards prioritize user experience, but the GIGABYTE model is slightly more advanced with its cutting-edge technology, which may appeal more to tech-savvy users.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS and GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are an AMD user looking for solid performance at a lower price point, the ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS at $99.99 is an excellent choice. However, if you aim for the latest Intel processors and advanced features, the GIGABYTE Z790 Eagle AX at $159.99 offers superior performance and future-proof capabilities. Ultimately, both motherboards have their strengths, and your choice should align with your gaming preferences and hardware compatibility requirements.