vsversusfinder

Beelink Mini PC, Mini S13 Intel Twin Lake N150 , vs KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer, AMD Ryzen 4300U ,

Updated August 2026 — Beelink Mini PC, Mini S13 Intel Twin Lake N150 , wins on size and cooling, KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer, AMD Ryzen 4300U , wins on weight and design.

The KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC offers superior performance and features at a lower price, making it the better choice for most users.

Why Beelink Mini PC, Mini S13 Intel Twin Lake N150 , is better

Storage

Beelink has a larger 1TB SSD.

Design

Sleek design with wall-mount option.

Cooling

Effective cooling features for multitasking.

Why KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer, AMD Ryzen 4300U , is better

Performance

KAMRUI's AMD Ryzen 4300U outperforms Beelink.

Display

Triple 4K display support versus dual.

Connectivity

More USB ports and options available.

Overall score

Beelink Mini PC, Mini S13 Intel Twin Lake N150 ,
72
KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer, AMD Ryzen 4300U ,
85

Specifications

SpecBeelink Mini PC, Mini S13 Intel Twin Lake N150 ,KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer, AMD Ryzen 4300U ,
ProcessorIntel N150AMD Ryzen 4300U
RAM16GB DDR416GB DDR4
Storage1TB SSD256GB SSD
Display SupportDual 4KTriple 4K
USB Ports4 USB 3.26 USB 3.2

Dimension comparison

Beelink Mini PC, Mini S13 Intel Twin Lake N150 ,KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer, AMD Ryzen 4300U ,

Performance Comparison

When it comes to performance, the KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC outshines the Beelink Mini PC, thanks to its AMD Ryzen 4300U processor. The KAMRUI features a base clock of 2.7GHz, which can boost up to 3.7GHz, providing about 25% higher base clock speed compared to the Intel Twin Lake N150 in the Beelink. This results in a performance that is approximately 50% better than the i3-10110U and 15% better than the Ryzen 5 3500U, making it more suitable for multitasking and demanding applications. The Beelink, while competent for everyday tasks, operates at a maximum frequency of 3.4GHz, which might limit its performance in more intensive scenarios.

Memory and Storage

The Beelink Mini PC comes equipped with 16GB DDR4 RAM and a 1TB SSD, while the KAMRUI features the same 16GB RAM but only has a 256GB SSD. This gives the Beelink Mini PC a significant edge in storage capacity, providing about four times more space for files, applications, and media. However, the KAMRUI offers expandable storage options with two M.2 slots, enabling upgrades up to 4TB, which could make it a future-proof option for users looking to increase their storage without replacing the device. While both offer solid memory specifications, the Beelink’s larger SSD is a notable advantage for users with extensive storage needs.

Graphics and Display Capabilities

For graphical performance and display capabilities, the KAMRUI Pinova P1 takes the lead with its support for triple 4K displays. It can connect three monitors simultaneously through HDMI, DisplayPort, and USB-C, making it ideal for users who require extensive screen real estate for productivity or entertainment. In contrast, the Beelink Mini PC supports dual 4K displays but lacks the versatility of triple output. This difference could be a deciding factor for users who rely heavily on multi-monitor setups for their work or leisure activities.

Connectivity Options

Both the Beelink and KAMRUI mini PCs offer a variety of connectivity options, but the KAMRUI excels in versatility. It comes with six USB 3.2 ports, a USB-C port, HDMI, DisplayPort, and Gigabit Ethernet, providing a comprehensive array of options for connecting peripherals and networking. The Beelink, while equipped with four USB 3.2 ports and dual HDMI outputs, falls short in the number of ports and lacks a DisplayPort option. For users who frequently connect multiple devices, the KAMRUI’s superior connectivity may offer a more seamless experience.

Design and Build Quality

In terms of design, both mini PCs are compact and stylish, but their approaches differ. The Beelink Mini PC boasts a sleek design with dimensions of 115 x 102 x 41mm, making it suitable for various environments, including offices and home entertainment setups. It also includes a wall-mounted bracket, promoting a tidy workspace. The KAMRUI Pinova P1, while also compact, focuses more on function with its robust build designed for 24/7 operation. This could appeal to users who need a reliable machine for continuous usage. Both designs are appealing, but the choice may come down to personal preference and intended use.

Cooling and Power Efficiency

The Beelink Mini PC is designed with efficient cooling features, including a built-in cooling fan and heat sink, which help maintain performance during extended use. This is particularly beneficial for users who engage in multitasking or run intensive applications. Conversely, the KAMRUI emphasizes reliability with its design that supports 24/7 operation, suggesting it too has effective cooling, though specific details on cooling mechanisms are not provided. Both systems are energy-efficient, but the Beelink’s low power consumption claims may be advantageous for environmentally conscious users.

Price Point

Price-wise, the Beelink Mini PC retails for $439.00, while the KAMRUI Pinova P1 is significantly more affordable at $319.99. This makes the KAMRUI about 27% cheaper than the Beelink, which could be a crucial factor for budget-conscious consumers. Despite the price difference, the KAMRUI offers competitive performance and features, making it a strong contender in the mini PC market. Users may find that the KAMRUI delivers excellent value without sacrificing essential capabilities.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Beelink Mini PC and the KAMRUI Pinova P1 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize performance and multitasking capabilities, the KAMRUI’s superior AMD Ryzen processor, triple 4K display support, and extensive connectivity options make it an excellent choice, especially at a lower price point. However, if storage capacity and sleek design are more critical for your applications, the Beelink Mini PC’s larger SSD and compact design may sway your decision. Assessing your requirements against these strengths will help determine the best fit for your computing needs.