vsversusfinder

Canon EF 75- vs Laowa

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on price and focal length, Laowa wins on aperture and distortion.

The Canon EF 75-300mm offers versatility and affordability, while the Laowa 12mm excels in low-light performance and image quality.

Why Canon EF 75- is better

Price

Canon is significantly cheaper at $169.

Versatility

Canon offers a zoom range of 75-300mm.

Weight

Canon is generally lighter than typical telephoto lenses.

Why Laowa is better

Aperture

Laowa has a maximum aperture of f/2.8.

Distortion

Laowa features virtually zero distortion.

Autofocus

Laowa includes an autofocus system.

Overall score

Canon EF 75-
65
Laowa
85

Specifications

SpecCanon EF 75-Laowa
Max Aperturef/4-5.6f/2.8
Focal Length75-300mm12mm
WeightNot Specified377g
AutofocusMicromotorYes
DistortionNot SpecifiedVirtually Zero

Dimension comparison

Canon EF 75-Laowa

Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm and Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite

The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is priced at $169.00, while the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite Zero-D FF Ultra-Wide Angle Lens costs significantly more at $699.00. This price difference of $530.00 makes the Canon lens about 76% cheaper than the Laowa lens. Each lens caters to different photography needs, making them suitable for distinct shooting scenarios. The Canon lens excels in versatility with its zoom capabilities, while the Laowa lens is designed for expansive landscape and architectural photography.

Focal Length and Versatility

The Canon EF 75-300mm offers a focal length range of 75-300mm, providing significant versatility for various shooting situations. This range allows photographers to capture distant subjects with ease, making it ideal for wildlife and sports photography. In contrast, the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite features a fixed focal length of 12mm, which is excellent for wide-angle shots but lacks the zoom flexibility of the Canon lens. For photographers who need the ability to frame subjects at varying distances, the Canon lens is the clear choice due to its broader focal range.

Aperture Performance

When it comes to aperture performance, the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite shines with its maximum aperture of f/2.8, which provides excellent low-light performance and creative depth control. This feature is particularly advantageous for capturing images in challenging lighting conditions. On the other hand, the Canon EF 75-300mm has a maximum aperture that ranges from f/4 to f/5.6, which is less effective in low light. Consequently, for those who prioritize low-light shooting or artistic background blur, the Laowa lens offers a substantial advantage.

Image Distortion and Quality

The Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite boasts virtually zero distortion, an impressive feat for ultra-wide-angle lenses. This attribute is essential for landscape and architectural photography, where maintaining straight lines is crucial. The Canon EF 75-300mm, while capable of producing good images, does not specifically highlight distortion control in its specifications. Therefore, photographers focused on achieving high-quality, distortion-free images will find the Laowa lens to be the superior option.

Weight and Portability

Weighing in at only 377g, the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite is designed for portability, making it an ideal companion for extended shooting sessions. In contrast, the weight of the Canon EF 75-300mm is not specified, but telephoto zoom lenses typically tend to be heavier due to their construction. For photographers who prioritize lightweight gear for travel and convenience, the Laowa lens presents a more attractive option, especially considering its advanced features.

Autofocus Capabilities

The Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite features autofocus, enhancing the ease of capturing quick shots without manual adjustments. This is particularly beneficial for photographers who need to react quickly, like in event photography. The Canon EF 75-300mm, on the other hand, utilizes a front group rotating extension system with a Micromotor for focus adjustment, which may not be as reliable or fast as the autofocus system of the Laowa lens. Therefore, for those who value rapid focusing, the Laowa lens stands out as the better choice.

Price Comparison

The price disparity between the two lenses is substantial. The Canon EF 75-300mm is priced at $169.00, making it an economical choice for photographers on a budget. In contrast, the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite retails for $699.00, a significant investment that reflects its specialized features and performance. For those new to photography or who require a general-purpose lens, the Canon model serves as a cost-effective option. Conversely, serious landscape or architectural photographers willing to invest in premium quality would be inclined toward the Laowa lens despite its higher price.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm and the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you require versatility, a broader focal range, and a budget-friendly option, the Canon lens is the obvious choice. However, if you prioritize features like low-light performance, minimal distortion, and lightweight design, the Laowa lens is worth the investment. Assess your specific photography style and needs to determine which lens will best enhance your creative endeavors.