Canon EF 75- vs TTARTISAN AF
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length, TTARTISAN AF wins on portability and weight.
The Canon lens excels in versatility for distant subjects, while the TTARTISAN lens offers superior portability and modern features. Choose based on your specific photography needs.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Focal Length
75-300mm range for distant subjects
Brand Reputation
Canon is a well-established brand
Price History
Higher average price indicates perceived value
Why TTARTISAN AF is better
Portability
Ultra-compact pancake design
Low-Light Performance
Wider f/2.8 aperture
Modern Features
Includes USB-C for firmware upgrades
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | TTARTISAN AF |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Focal Length | 75-300mm | 27mm |
| Weight | 480g | 200g |
| Focus System | Micromotor | STM |
| Price | $169.00 | $159.99 |
Dimension comparison
Product Overview
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens and the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 APS-C Frame Lens are two distinct camera lenses catering to different photographic needs. The Canon lens is priced at $169.00, while the TTARTISAN lens is about 6% cheaper at $159.99. This price difference may influence a photographer's decision based on their budget and lens requirements.
Design and Portability
When considering design, the TTARTISAN lens stands out with its ultra-compact pancake design, making it easy to carry, particularly for travel. Its sleek profile allows photographers to maintain a low profile and easily stow the lens in a bag without bulk. In contrast, the Canon lens is larger and bulkier, given its telephoto zoom capabilities, which may not be as convenient for on-the-go photography. The TTARTISAN's lightweight nature allows for a more effortless shooting experience in dynamic environments.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens offers a focal length range of 75-300mm, which is ideal for capturing distant subjects, making it perfect for wildlife or sports photography. This lens provides a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, allowing for decent light intake during shooting. On the other hand, the TTARTISAN lens has a fixed focal length of 27mm, providing a wide-angle perspective suitable for street photography and landscapes. Each lens excels in its intended use, with the Canon lens being more versatile for varied shooting scenarios.
Autofocus and Operation
The TTARTISAN lens employs an STM (Stepping Motor) that allows for smooth and quiet focusing, which is particularly beneficial for video recording. Additionally, eye recognition focus enhances its ability to capture sharp images of subjects easily. In comparison, the Canon lens uses a front group rotating extension system with a Micromotor for focus adjustment, which may not be as swift or silent as the TTARTISAN's system. This difference can significantly affect the user experience, especially for videographers or those who require quick adjustments.
Aperture and Light Performance
The TTARTISAN AF 27mm lens features a maximum aperture of f/2.8, which provides greater light-gathering capability compared to the Canon lens. This wider aperture allows for better low-light performance and enhanced depth of field control, making it more suitable for creative photography in diverse lighting conditions. The Canon lens, while providing a decent maximum aperture, may struggle in low-light situations where the TTARTISAN excels.
Special Features
The TTARTISAN lens includes unique features such as a clicked aperture ring for more precise adjustments and a USB-C interface for firmware upgrades, enhancing its functionality and longevity. These innovative aspects offer photographers a more tailored shooting experience, allowing for quick adjustments and enhanced performance over time. Meanwhile, the Canon lens lacks such advanced features, focusing more on traditional lens construction without the modern enhancements that the TTARTISAN offers.
Price Trends and Value
Currently, the Canon lens is priced at $169.00, and its average price over the past 90 days has been around $179.85. In contrast, the TTARTISAN lens's average price over the same period is $157.58, demonstrating its consistent value. The slight price difference may be a consideration for budget-conscious photographers looking to maximize their investment in equipment. The TTARTISAN lens not only offers a lower initial price but also the potential for better value through its technological upgrades.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the Canon EF 75-300mm lens and the TTARTISAN AF 27mm lens depends on your specific photography needs. If you require versatility for distant subjects and prefer a traditional telephoto lens, the Canon option is worth the investment. However, if portability, low-light performance, and modern features are your priorities, the TTARTISAN lens is the better choice for its price point. Consider your shooting style and the subjects you typically capture to make the most informed decision between these two lenses.

