Canon EF 75- vs Viltrox
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on zoom and build, Viltrox wins on aperture and portability.
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens offers versatility with its zoom capabilities, while the Viltrox 35mm excels in low-light performance and portability. Choose based on your specific photography needs.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Zoom Range
Canon offers a versatile 75-300mm zoom.
Price
Canon is cheaper at $169.
Build Quality
Canon has a robust construction.
Why Viltrox is better
Aperture
Viltrox has a wider f/1.7 aperture.
Weight
Viltrox is lighter at 170g.
Autofocus
Viltrox features near-silent autofocus.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Viltrox |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 75-300mm | 35mm |
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/1.7 |
| Lens Type | Zoom | Prime |
| Camera Mount | Canon EF | Sony E |
| Construction | 13 elements | Unknown |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is priced at $169.00, making it a solid option for those looking for versatility in photography. This lens offers a focal length range of 75-300mm, which is ideal for capturing distant subjects, whether you're photographing wildlife or sporting events. It features a lens construction of 13 elements in 9 groups, ensuring good image quality across its zoom range. With a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, it performs adequately in various lighting conditions, although it may struggle in lower light compared to faster lenses.
Overview of the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E
The Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E is priced at $179.00, positioning it as a slightly more expensive option compared to the Canon lens. This prime lens is designed specifically for Sony E-mount mirrorless cameras, providing a 35mm equivalent focal length, making it an excellent choice for portrait and street photography. Its bright f/1.7 maximum aperture allows for exceptional low-light performance and better control over depth of field. The lens also supports EXIF information transmission and offers a lightweight design at just 170g, making it suitable for travel and everyday use.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Canon lens offers a much broader focal length range of 75-300mm, which grants users the flexibility to shoot a variety of subjects from a considerable distance. This versatility is ideal for photographers who might need to switch between wide-angle and telephoto shots without changing lenses. In contrast, the Viltrox lens has a fixed focal length of 35mm, which excels in specific scenarios such as portraits and street photography but lacks the zoom capabilities of the Canon lens. Therefore, if you require a lens that can adapt to different shooting conditions, the Canon EF lens is the more versatile choice.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
When it comes to aperture, the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E significantly outperforms the Canon EF lens, with a maximum aperture of f/1.7 compared to the Canon's maximum of f/4-5.6. This difference allows the Viltrox lens to excel in low-light situations, enabling photographers to capture clearer images without sacrificing shutter speed. Moreover, the wider aperture of the Viltrox lens affords greater control over depth of field, making it easier to achieve beautiful bokeh effects in portraits. Thus, if low-light performance and depth of field control are your primary concerns, the Viltrox lens offers distinct advantages.
Build Quality and Design
The Canon EF lens is a traditional telephoto zoom lens built to withstand the rigors of outdoor photography, with a solid construction that includes 13 elements in 9 groups. However, it may be bulkier compared to the lightweight Viltrox lens, which weighs only 170g. This lightweight design makes the Viltrox lens more travel-friendly and easier to handle for extended periods. While the Canon lens is robust, those prioritizing portability may find the Viltrox lens more appealing due to its compact build.
Autofocus Capabilities
Both lenses cater to different autofocus needs, with the Canon EF lens using a front group rotating extension system with a micromotor for focus adjustment. This system is effective but may not be as fast or silent as the Viltrox lens, which is designed to offer near-silent autofocus. The Viltrox lens also supports EXIF information transmission, enhancing the shooting experience with compatible Sony cameras. If fast and quiet autofocus is essential for your photography style, the Viltrox lens stands out as the better option.
Price Comparison
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III is priced at $169.00, while the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E is listed at $179.00, making the Canon lens about 6% cheaper. This price difference may be an important factor for budget-conscious photographers. However, the additional features and benefits of the Viltrox lens, such as its superior aperture and autofocus capabilities, could justify the higher price for users who prioritize those aspects. Depending on your specific needs, the price-to-value ratio could swing in favor of either lens.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens and the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E depends on your photography style and requirements. If you need a versatile lens with a broad focal range for varied shooting scenarios, the Canon lens is the clear winner. However, if you prioritize low-light performance, a lightweight design, and advanced autofocus features, the Viltrox lens would be a better fit. Consider your specific needs and photography goals to make the most informed decision.

