vsversusfinder

Canon EF 75- vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and close focus, VILTROX wins on price and weight.

The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 excels in low-light performance and autofocus, while the Canon EF 75-300mm offers versatility at a lower price. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why Canon EF 75- is better

Price

Canon is $10 cheaper than VILTROX

Versatility

Canon has a wider focal length range

Weight

Canon is lighter than VILTROX

Why VILTROX is better

Low-Light

VILTROX has a brighter f/1.7 aperture

Autofocus

VILTROX features fast and silent autofocus

Close Focus

VILTROX has a minimum focusing distance of 0.33m

Overall score

Canon EF 75-
75
VILTROX
85

Specifications

SpecCanon EF 75-VILTROX
Max Aperturef/4-5.6f/1.7
Focal Length75-300mm35mm
Focus TypeMicromotorSTM
Minimum Focus1.5m0.33m
Elements1311

Dimension comparison

Canon EF 75-VILTROX

Introduction to the Canon EF 75-300mm and VILTROX 35mm

When choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens and the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji, it's essential to understand their unique features and intended uses. Each lens caters to different photographic needs, making it important to analyze their specifications and performance to determine which is best suited for your style.

Focal Length and Versatility

The Canon EF 75-300mm offers a versatile focal length range of 75-300mm, making it ideal for capturing distant subjects like wildlife and sports. In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm features a fixed focal length of 35mm, which provides a natural perspective akin to the human eye, perfect for portraits and street photography. This significant difference means that the Canon lens is better suited for varied shooting scenarios, while the VILTROX lens excels in specific contexts, such as low-light conditions and close-ups.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

A standout feature of the VILTROX 35mm is its bright f/1.7 aperture, which allows for exceptional low-light performance and beautiful bokeh. This capability is particularly advantageous for photographers who often shoot in challenging lighting conditions. Conversely, the Canon EF 75-300mm has a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, which, while adequate for many situations, does not match the VILTROX in low-light scenarios. Therefore, if low-light performance and depth of field control are priorities, the VILTROX lens would be the better choice.

Autofocus and Shooting Experience

The VILTROX 35mm lens features a new STM motor that delivers fast, precise, and near-silent autofocus, which is crucial for shooting video and capturing spontaneous moments. This lens also minimizes focus breathing, ensuring smooth transitions during focus changes. On the other hand, the Canon EF 75-300mm uses a front group rotating extension system with a micromotor for focus adjustment. While it is functional, it doesn't provide the same level of speed and accuracy as the VILTROX. Photographers who value quick and silent autofocus will likely prefer the VILTROX for its superior performance in this area.

Optical Design and Image Quality

In terms of optical construction, the VILTROX 35mm boasts 11 elements in 9 groups, which include specialized elements designed to minimize chromatic aberrations, distortion, and flare. This advanced optical design contributes to outstanding image quality across various shooting scenarios. Meanwhile, the Canon EF 75-300mm features 13 elements in 9 groups, but lacks the same level of optical innovation found in the VILTROX. As a result, for those prioritizing image quality, particularly in complex lighting situations, the VILTROX lens may offer a more satisfying experience.

Minimum Focusing Distance

Another area where the VILTROX 35mm shines is its close focusing distance of just 0.33 meters (33cm). This allows photographers to capture stunning close-up shots with incredible detail, making it versatile for a broad range of shooting scenarios. In contrast, the Canon EF 75-300mm has a closest focusing distance of 1.5 meters (4.9 feet), which limits its ability to take close-up shots. Thus, if macro capabilities are a significant factor for you, the VILTROX lens would be the superior option.

Price Comparison and Value

The Canon EF 75-300mm is priced at $169.00, while the VILTROX 35mm comes in slightly higher at $179.00. This price difference of $10 makes the Canon about 5.6% cheaper than the VILTROX. However, considering the features and capabilities of each lens, the VILTROX may justify its higher price with better low-light performance, advanced autofocus, and superior optical design. Depending on your budget and specific needs, either lens can provide good value.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Canon EF 75-300mm and the VILTROX 35mm hinges on your photographic style and requirements. If you seek versatility with a broad focal length range and a lower price point, the Canon lens may be the better fit. However, if you prioritize low-light performance, fast autofocus, and exceptional image quality, the VILTROX lens stands out as the superior option. Assess your photography needs carefully to make the best decision for your next lens purchase.