Canon EF 75- vs Tamron 28-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and length, Tamron 28- wins on mod and aperture.
The Canon EF 75-300mm is a budget-friendly telephoto lens, while the Tamron 28-75mm offers superior performance and features for serious photographers.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Price
Canon lens is significantly cheaper at $199.99.
Weight
Canon lens is lighter at 16.8 ounces.
Zoom Range
Canon offers a longer focal length of 75-300mm.
Why Tamron 28- is better
Aperture
Tamron has a constant f/2.8 aperture.
Autofocus
Tamron features a fast VXD linear motor.
Close-Up
Tamron has a better minimum object distance of 7.1 inches.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Tamron 28- |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $199.99 | $749.00 |
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Autofocus | DC Motor | VXD Linear Motor |
| Zoom Type | Rotating | Standard |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm and Tamron 28-75mm
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is priced at $199.99, while the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 costs significantly more at $749.00. This price difference of about 273% reflects the distinct target markets and functionalities of these two lenses. The Canon lens is designed for SLR cameras, making it ideal for users who need a versatile telephoto option without breaking the bank. In contrast, the Tamron lens caters to Nikon Z mount mirrorless camera users, focusing on high-speed performance and superior optical quality.
Build Quality and Design
The Tamron 28-75mm boasts a compact design at 4.7 inches long and weighs 19.4 ounces, providing a lightweight and manageable option for photographers. Its moisture-resistant construction and fluorine coating enhance durability, making it suitable for various shooting conditions. On the other hand, the Canon EF 75-300mm measures 4.8 inches in length and weighs slightly less at 16.8 ounces. While it lacks advanced weather sealing, its build is sturdy enough for typical use. The differences in design reflect the intended use; the Tamron is more geared towards professional applications, while the Canon serves casual photographers.
Focal Length and Aperture
The Canon EF 75-300mm offers a focal length range of 75-300mm, with a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6. This allows for significant zoom capabilities, making it ideal for capturing distant subjects, such as wildlife or sports. In contrast, the Tamron 28-75mm has a shorter focal range of 28-75mm but features a constant f/2.8 aperture throughout. This wider aperture allows for better performance in low-light conditions and creates a more pronounced depth of field effect. If you're looking for versatility in long-distance capture, the Canon lens stands out, while the Tamron excels in low-light scenarios and portraiture.
Autofocus Performance
The Tamron 28-75mm is equipped with a fast, quiet VXD linear motor that ensures high-speed and high-precision autofocus, making it ideal for capturing fast-moving subjects. In comparison, the Canon EF 75-300mm utilizes a DC motor for autofocus, which, while functional, does not match the speed or quietness of the Tamron's VXD system. For photographers who prioritize quick and accurate focusing, particularly in dynamic environments, the Tamron lens is the superior choice.
Close-Up Capabilities
The minimum object distance (MOD) for the Tamron 28-75mm is 7.1 inches at its wide end, allowing for creative close-ups with a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2.7. This capability makes it an excellent choice for photographers interested in detailed close-up shots. The Canon EF 75-300mm, while versatile, has a closest focusing distance of 4.9 feet, making it less adept at close-up photography. If macro shooting or detailed close work is essential, the Tamron lens is distinctly advantageous.
Image Stabilization
Neither the Canon EF 75-300mm nor the Tamron 28-75mm features image stabilization. However, the lack of stabilization in the Canon lens may pose challenges when shooting at longer focal lengths, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of stabilization in both lenses suggests that users may need to rely on steady hands or tripod support for optimal results. While image stabilization is a valuable feature for reducing camera shake, both lenses remain competitive in their respective categories without it.
Price Consideration
The Canon EF 75-300mm is priced at $199.99, making it a budget-friendly option compared to the Tamron 28-75mm, which retails for $749.00. This price difference of about $549 highlights the Canon lens's appeal to entry-level and casual photographers seeking a telephoto solution. The Tamron lens, with its advanced features and design aimed at serious photographers, justifies its higher price tag. For those on a budget or new to photography, the Canon lens represents a more accessible investment.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm and the Tamron 28-75mm largely depends on your specific photography needs and budget. If you are a beginner or a casual photographer looking for an affordable telephoto lens, the Canon EF 75-300mm offers great value for its price. However, if you are a professional or serious enthusiast looking for superior autofocus performance, excellent low-light capabilities, and close-up photography options, the Tamron 28-75mm justifies its higher cost. Ultimately, both lenses have their strengths, making them suitable for different types of users.

