Canon EF 75- vs Viltrox
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on zoom and build, Viltrox wins on aperture and weight.
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens offers greater versatility for distance shots, while the Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E excels in low-light performance and portability.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Zoom Range
Canon offers a versatile 75-300mm zoom.
Focal Length
Canon covers a wider focal length range.
Build Quality
Canon lens has a solid build for telephoto use.
Why Viltrox is better
Weight
Viltrox is significantly lighter at 170g.
Aperture
Viltrox has a brighter f/1.7 aperture.
Autofocus
Viltrox uses a quieter STM motor.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | Viltrox |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/1.7 |
| Focal Length | 75-300mm | 25mm |
| Autofocus | DC Motor | STM Motor |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Price | $199.99 | $176.00 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III and Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E
When it comes to choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens and the Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E, both lenses cater to distinct photography needs. The Canon lens, priced at $199.99, offers a versatile zoom range ideal for distance shots, while the Viltrox lens, at $176.00, serves as a prime lens with a bright aperture suited for low-light conditions. This article will delve deeper into their features, performance, and suitability for different shooting scenarios.
Design and Build Quality
Both lenses boast a solid design but cater to different styles of photography. The Canon EF 75-300mm lens measures 2.8 inches in diameter and 4.8 inches long, making it a compact option for a telephoto lens. Weighing 16.8 ounces, it’s reasonably portable for its category. On the other hand, the Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E weighs only 170 grams, making it significantly lighter and more travel-friendly. This lightweight design is especially appealing for everyday use and travel photography. Thus, if portability is a priority, the Viltrox lens has a clear advantage.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E shines in low-light conditions thanks to its bright f/1.7 maximum aperture. This feature allows for greater control over depth of field and enables photographers to capture clear images even in challenging lighting. In contrast, the Canon EF 75-300mm lens has a maximum aperture range of f/4-5.6, which limits its performance in low-light situations. As a result, if you frequently shoot in dim environments or seek to achieve a blurred background effect, the Viltrox lens will serve you better.
Autofocus Capabilities
Autofocus performance is crucial for both stills and video shooting. The Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E employs an STM stepper motor, ensuring a quiet autofocus experience that does not disrupt photo or video sessions. This feature is particularly beneficial for videographers who require smooth and unobtrusive focus shifts. In contrast, the Canon lens uses a DC motor for autofocus, which, while functional, may not provide the same level of quiet operation as the Viltrox. Therefore, for those prioritizing silent autofocus, the Viltrox lens is the more suitable choice.
Focal Length Versatility
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens offers a significant advantage in terms of focal length versatility, covering 75mm to 300mm. This extensive zoom range makes it an excellent choice for capturing everything from wildlife to sports and distant portraits. Meanwhile, the Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E, with its fixed 25mm focal length, is better suited for street photography, portraits, and general-purpose use. If your photography demands a wide range of focal lengths, the Canon lens clearly provides more flexibility.
Image Stabilization
An important feature for many photographers is image stabilization, which helps to reduce blurriness from camera shake. Unfortunately, the Canon EF 75-300mm lens lacks image stabilization. This may pose challenges, especially when shooting at longer focal lengths without a tripod. Conversely, the Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E does not mention stabilization, but its wide aperture allows for faster shutter speeds, which can mitigate the need for stabilization in many scenarios. Overall, if stabilization is a high priority, neither lens is ideal, but the Viltrox may offer better performance due to its larger aperture.
Price Comparison
With the Canon EF 75-300mm lens priced at $199.99 and the Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E available for $176.00, the Viltrox lens is about 12% cheaper. This price difference may influence budget-conscious photographers looking for a quality lens without breaking the bank. While both lenses offer unique advantages, the Viltrox provides a more economical option for those who do not require the extensive zoom range of the Canon lens.
Target Audience
The Canon EF 75-300mm lens is an excellent option for photographers who need versatility in their focal lengths, making it ideal for capturing subjects from a distance. It's particularly well-suited for sports photographers, wildlife enthusiasts, and anyone needing to zoom in on distant subjects. Conversely, the Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E caters to portrait and street photographers, as well as content creators who value low-light performance and a lightweight design. Each lens serves a specific audience, so the choice depends on the photographer’s needs.
Which should you buy?
The decision between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III and the Viltrox 25mm F1.7 E ultimately depends on your specific photography requirements. If you require versatility in focal lengths and are focused on long-distance shots, the Canon lens is the better choice. However, if you prioritize low-light performance, portability, and a quieter autofocus system, the Viltrox lens is the way to go. Both lenses are well-regarded in their respective domains, so choosing the right one will hinge on your style and usage needs.

