Canon EF 75- vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- wins on focal length and weight, VILTROX wins on diameter.
The Canon lens excels in telephoto versatility, while the VILTROX offers superior low-light performance and portability.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Focal Length
Longer range for telephoto shots
Build Quality
Sturdy construction for durability
Weight
Heavier for stability in telephoto use
Why VILTROX is better
Aperture
Wider aperture for low-light performance
Autofocus
Faster and more accurate autofocus
Portability
Lighter and more compact design
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF 75- | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Optical Design | 13 elements in 9 groups | 13 elements in 11 groups |
| Field of View | 32° to 8° | 113.8° |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Autofocus Motor | DC | STM |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens is priced at $199.99 and is designed specifically for Canon SLR cameras. This lens offers a versatile focal length range of 75-300mm, making it suitable for capturing everything from distant wildlife to intimate portraits. With a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, it enables decent low-light performance, although it lacks image stabilization. Weighing 16.8 ounces and measuring 4.8 inches in length, this lens is relatively lightweight and portable for a telephoto lens. Its closest focusing distance is 4.9 feet, allowing for detailed shots of subjects at a distance.
Overview of the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E
The VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E is priced slightly lower at $199.00, making it about 0.5% cheaper than the Canon lens. This ultra-wide-angle lens is compatible with Sony E-mount cameras and offers a focal length of 13.5mm, translating to a wide 113.8° field of view. It features a maximum aperture of f/2.8, which allows for excellent low-light photography and creative depth-of-field effects. Weighing just 175 grams, this lens is highly portable and ideal for travel. With a minimum focusing distance of only 0.13 meters (approximately 5 inches), it excels in close-up photography, making it versatile for various shooting scenarios.
Image Quality Comparison
In terms of image quality, the Canon EF 75-300mm lens offers a maximum aperture range of f/4-5.6, which is sufficient for everyday photography but may struggle in very low-light conditions. The VILTROX 9mm F2.8, on the other hand, has a faster maximum aperture of f/2.8, which significantly enhances its low-light capabilities and provides sharper images with better contrast. The optical design of the VILTROX includes 13 elements in 11 groups, including special elements to minimize distortion and aberrations, ensuring sharp images from center to edge. The Canon, while built on a reliable optical system, does not have the same level of advanced optical engineering, potentially leading to less sharpness at the edges of the frame.
Autofocus Performance
The autofocus systems of these two lenses differ notably. The Canon EF 75-300mm uses a DC motor for autofocus, which can be slower and less precise compared to modern autofocus systems. This may be a disadvantage for action photography where quick focus is essential. Conversely, the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 features an STM motor, known for its fast and accurate autofocus performance. This makes it well-suited for capturing dynamic scenes or vlogging, as it can quickly adapt to moving subjects. Thus, if you prioritize speed and accuracy in autofocus, the VILTROX lens is the better choice.
Build Quality and Design
Both lenses are designed with user experience in mind, but they cater to different needs. The Canon EF 75-300mm has a solid build, measuring 4.8 inches long with a diameter of 2.8 inches, which contributes to its sturdy feel. However, it does not include image stabilization, which can be a drawback for handheld shooting at longer focal lengths. In contrast, the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 is lightweight and compact, making it more convenient for travel and everyday use. It also includes a lotus-shaped lens hood that helps to minimize lens flare and enhance image quality in bright conditions. This thoughtful design feature makes the VILTROX more suitable for photographers who value portability and versatility.
Versatility in Photography
When it comes to versatility, the Canon EF 75-300mm shines in telephoto applications, allowing photographers to capture distant subjects or create beautiful portraits. Its 75-300mm range is ideal for a variety of photography styles, including wildlife and sports. Conversely, the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 is designed for wide-angle photography, making it perfect for landscapes, architecture, and vlogging. Its ultra-wide field of view allows for creative compositions and dynamic shots. Ultimately, the choice between these lenses heavily depends on the type of photography you intend to pursue—telephoto versus wide-angle.
Pricing and Value
The Canon EF 75-300mm is priced at $199.99, while the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 is available for $199.00. This makes the VILTROX about $0.99 cheaper, translating to a negligible price difference. However, considering the features and performance of each lens, the value proposition may differ. The VILTROX offers advanced optical design and faster autofocus, which may justify its price for many users, particularly those working with Sony E-mount cameras. The Canon lens, while less feature-rich, remains a solid choice for those who already own Canon SLR systems and need a reliable telephoto option.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens and the VILTROX 9mm F2.8 E depends largely on your specific photography needs. If you primarily shoot wildlife, sports, or portraits requiring a longer focal length, the Canon lens is an excellent choice due to its versatility and range. However, if you are looking for a wide-angle lens that excels in low-light conditions and provides superior autofocus performance, the VILTROX is the better option. Ultimately, weigh your primary photography interests against the strengths of each lens to make the best decision.

