Canon EF-S 18- vs Canon RF 24-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF-S 18- wins on weight, Canon RF 24- wins on focal length and length.
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers superior features and versatility, making it the better choice for serious photographers.
Why Canon EF-S 18- is better
Price
The EF-S lens is significantly cheaper at $134.95.
Weight
The EF-S lens is lighter, making it easier to carry.
Simplicity
The EF-S lens is straightforward for casual use.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Focal Length
The RF lens covers a broader range of 24-105mm.
Image Stabilization
The RF lens provides up to five stops of stabilization.
Autofocus
The RF lens features a smooth STM motor for quiet operation.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF-S 18- | Canon RF 24- |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $134.95 | $476.95 |
| Max Aperture | f/5.6 | f/7.1 |
| Image Stabilization | 4 stops | 5 stops |
| Autofocus Type | Gear-driven | STM |
| Macro Capability | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II SLR Lens is significantly more budget-friendly, priced at $134.95, while the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens comes at $476.95. This means the RF lens is about 253% more expensive than the EF-S lens. If you are looking for a cost-effective option for casual photography, the EF-S lens may better suit your budget. However, for those willing to invest more, the RF lens offers advanced features that could justify the higher price.
Build Quality and Design
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens stands out with its compact and lightweight design, making it ideal for travel and everyday use. In contrast, the EF-S 18-55mm lens, while also designed for convenience, lacks the advanced features that enhance usability in varied conditions. The RF lens incorporates a Control Ring for quick adjustments and a rounded seven-blade diaphragm for improved background blur, elements that elevate its design quality. Therefore, if a well-constructed, versatile lens is a priority, the RF option would be the better choice.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers a broader focal length range of 24-105mm compared to the EF-S lens's 18-55mm. This extended range allows for greater versatility, accommodating everything from wide-angle shots to short-telephoto perspectives. The RF lens is particularly suitable for a variety of photographic scenarios, including landscape, portrait, and casual video work. On the other hand, while the EF-S lens provides a solid zoom range, its limitations in focal length mean it may not be as adaptable for diverse shooting situations.
Image Stabilization Features
Both lenses feature image stabilization, but the RF 24-105mm lens has an advantage with its Optical Image Stabilizer providing up to five stops of correction. This is particularly beneficial for shooting in low-light conditions or at longer focal lengths. The EF-S lens, while equipped with Optical Image Stabilization, offers up to four stops of correction. For photographers who often shoot handheld in challenging lighting, the RF lens's enhanced stabilization could lead to sharper images and smoother video footage.
Autofocus Performance
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens utilizes a smooth STM stepping motor for autofocus, delivering quiet and precise focus transitions that are ideal for both still photography and video recording. This feature enhances the user experience, particularly for vloggers or those capturing dynamic scenes. In comparison, the EF-S lens also uses a gear-driven focus adjustment but does not boast the same level of quiet and smooth operation. If autofocus performance is critical to your shooting style, the RF lens is the clear winner.
Macro Capabilities
The RF 24-105mm lens includes a dedicated Center Macro Focus position that allows for close-up shooting with a maximum magnification of 1:2. This feature is perfect for capturing intricate details, making it ideal for product photography or nature shots. While the EF-S lens is a great all-rounder, it does not offer specific macro capabilities, limiting its effectiveness for detailed close-up work. For photographers interested in macro photography, the RF lens provides a distinct advantage.
User Experience and Accessories
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is bundled with useful accessories, including a 64GB memory card and a camera bag, making it a compelling package for new users or those looking to upgrade their gear. The EF-S lens does not come with such accessories, which may require additional purchases for new photographers. This added value in the RF lens package enhances the overall user experience, making it a more appealing option for those who want a complete setup right from the start.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II SLR Lens and the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens hinges on your specific needs and budget. If you are seeking an economical and reliable lens for everyday photography, the EF-S lens is an excellent choice at $134.95. Conversely, if you require a versatile, high-performance lens with advanced features and are willing to invest $476.95, the RF lens stands out as a superior option.

