Canon EF-S 55- vs Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF-S 55- wins on price, Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- wins on close focus and zoom.
The Canon EF-S 55-250mm is a budget-friendly option, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm offers superior features for serious photographers.
Why Canon EF-S 55- is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $329.99.
Weight
Canon is lighter at 1.2 lbs.
Portability
Canon is easier to carry for long sessions.
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- is better
Zoom Range
Nikon offers a 14.2x zoom from 28mm to 400mm.
Image Stabilization
Nikon provides superior VR technology.
Focusing
Nikon has advanced linear MF drive for smooth focusing.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon EF-S 55- | Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 55-250mm | 28-400mm |
| Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/4-8 |
| Min Focus | 2.79 ft | 0.2 m |
| Weight | 1.2 lbs | 1.6 lbs |
| Stabilization | 3.5 stops | 5.0 stops |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 is STM is significantly cheaper than the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR, priced at $329.99 compared to $1,296.95. This makes the Canon lens about 75% more affordable than its Nikon counterpart. If budget is a primary concern, the Canon lens offers a compelling option for photographers looking for a quality telephoto lens without breaking the bank. Despite the price difference, both lenses offer unique features that cater to different photography needs and styles.
Focal Length and Zoom Range
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm offers a much broader focal range than the Canon EF-S 55-250mm, covering from 28mm to 400mm. This equates to a 14.2x zoom, allowing for greater versatility in various shooting scenarios. In contrast, the Canon lens has a focal length of 55-250mm, which is also impressive but does not match the extensive range of the Nikon. For photographers who frequently switch between wide-angle and super-telephoto shots, the Nikon lens provides an all-in-one solution, making it ideal for dynamic environments like sports or wildlife photography.
Image Stabilization
Both lenses feature image stabilization, yet the Nikon lens goes a step further with its VR (Vibration Reduction) technology. The Nikon NIKKOR Z can achieve stabilization equivalent to a 5.0-stop increase in shutter speed, which is particularly beneficial in low-light conditions or when shooting handheld. The Canon EF-S lens offers stabilization for up to 3.5 equivalent stops, which is still effective but less robust than Nikon's offering. For photographers who often shoot in challenging light, the Nikon lens will likely provide better performance in minimizing blur.
Weight and Portability
The Canon EF-S 55-250mm is lighter than the Nikon NIKKOR Z. Weighing in at 1.2 lbs, the Canon lens is quite portable, making it easier to carry during long shooting sessions. The Nikon lens, while also designed for ease of use, weighs approximately 1.6 lbs. Although this difference may seem minor, it can affect comfort during extended shoots, especially for travel or event photography. For those prioritizing lightweight gear, the Canon lens has a clear advantage.
Focusing Capabilities
The Nikon NIKKOR Z offers superior focusing capabilities with its linear MF drive, enabling smooth and precise focusing that is particularly advantageous for video shooting. In contrast, the Canon EF-S lens is known for fast and silent operations but lacks the advanced focusing features of the Nikon. For videographers or photographers who require utmost precision and smooth transitions, the Nikon lens stands out as the better option.
Close Focusing Distance
The Nikon lens excels in close focusing capabilities, with a minimum focus distance of just 0.2m at its maximum wide-angle position. This feature allows users to achieve a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.35x at 28mm, making it easier to capture detailed close-up shots. The Canon lens has a minimum focusing distance of 2.79 feet, which limits its macro photography potential. For those interested in capturing intricate details or dynamic expressions in their subjects, the Nikon lens provides a significant advantage.
Target Audience
The Canon EF-S 55-250mm lens is an excellent choice for amateur photographers and those on a budget looking for a reliable telephoto lens. Its lightweight design and more affordable price make it accessible for casual use. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm, with its extensive zoom range and advanced features, is geared towards serious photographers and videographers who require versatility and high performance for various shooting conditions. This lens is ideal for professionals or enthusiasts who frequently capture a wide range of subjects.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 is STM and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a cost-effective lens that is lightweight and offers solid performance, the Canon is a great option at $329.99. However, if you require a lens with a broader zoom range, superior image stabilization, and advanced focusing capabilities, the Nikon at $1,296.95 is worth the investment. Each lens has its strengths, so consider your photography style before making a decision.

