Canon RF 24- vs Canon RF 75-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on filter size and weight, Canon RF 75- wins on min focus and max aperture.
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens offers greater versatility and features compared to the RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens, making it the better choice for most photographers.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Versatility
Covers wide-angle to short-telephoto.
Image Stabilization
Includes Optical Image Stabilizer.
Macro Capability
Offers close-up shooting with 1:2 magnification.
Why Canon RF 75- is better
Price
More budget-friendly option.
Telephoto Reach
Longer focal length for distant subjects.
Lightweight
Compact and easy to carry.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | Canon RF 75- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 75-300mm |
| Aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/4-5.6 |
| Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Autofocus | STM | DC Motor |
| Macro Focus | 1:2 | 0.25x |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens offers versatility and compact design, making it a great option for everyday photography. Priced at $476.95, this lens is designed for full-frame Canon RF-mount mirrorless cameras. It covers a focal length range from wide-angle to short-telephoto, making it suitable for various photographic styles, including travel, street photography, and casual video work. With its built-in Optical Image Stabilizer, the lens provides up to five stops of correction to minimize camera shake, enhancing image sharpness in low-light conditions.
Overview of the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens
The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens is a compact telephoto zoom lens priced at $253.95. This lens is designed for both full-frame and APS-C Canon RF-mount mirrorless cameras, providing a versatile focal length range of 75-300mm. The lens is lightweight and portable, making it ideal for capturing distant subjects such as wildlife and sports while remaining easy to carry. With a variable aperture of f/4-5.6, it balances reach and portability, ensuring photographers maintain image quality without the burden of a heavy lens.
Image Stabilization Features
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens features an Optical Image Stabilizer that enhances shooting in low-light conditions by reducing camera shake. This stabilization is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting, allowing for sharper images and smoother video footage. The five stops of correction provided by this system make it easier to capture clear photos without a tripod, offering greater creative flexibility.
In contrast, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens does not mention any optical stabilization features. Instead, it relies on its lightweight design and a variable aperture to maintain image quality. While this lens offers great reach for distant subjects, the lack of stabilization may make it more challenging to capture sharp images in low-light environments compared to its counterpart.
Autofocus Capabilities
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens employs a smooth STM stepping motor for autofocus, providing quiet and precise focus transitions, which are especially beneficial for video recording. This feature allows for natural and unobtrusive focus changes, making it ideal for vloggers and hybrid content creators. The lens also includes full-time manual focus override, allowing for easy adjustments when necessary.
On the other hand, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens utilizes a DC motor for its autofocus system. While this motor is responsive and accurate, it may not deliver the same level of quiet performance as the STM motor in the 24-105mm lens. For photographers who prioritize smooth and silent focus transitions, the 24-105mm lens may be the better choice.
Versatility in Focal Length
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens covers a focal length range that is ideal for a variety of photography styles, from landscapes to portraits. Its ability to seamlessly transition between wide-angle and short-telephoto perspectives makes it a great all-in-one lens for everyday use. The added benefit of a Center Macro Focus position allows for close-up shots with a maximum magnification of 1:2, expanding creative options.
Conversely, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens excels in telephoto reach, offering a focal length range that is particularly effective for capturing sports and wildlife. This lens provides an equivalent focal length of 120-480mm on APS-C cameras, making it a solid choice for photographers needing extended reach. However, it does not offer the same versatility for wide-angle shots as the 24-105mm lens.
Close-Focusing Capability
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens includes a dedicated Center Macro Focus setting, allowing for close-up photography with a 1:2 maximum magnification. This feature is particularly useful for capturing intricate details in subjects like food or small objects. The short minimum focusing distance enhances its usability for detail-oriented photography.
In contrast, the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens offers a minimum focusing distance of 4.9 feet with a maximum magnification of 0.25x. While it can handle semi-macro shooting, it does not match the close-focusing capability of the 24-105mm lens. Thus, for photographers who frequently shoot close-ups, the 24-105mm lens provides a significant advantage.
Price Comparison
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is priced at $476.95, while the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens is more budget-friendly at $253.95, making it about 47% cheaper. This price difference may attract photographers who are looking for a more economical option without compromising on essential features. However, the higher price of the 24-105mm lens reflects its advanced features, versatility, and superior stabilization.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you require a versatile lens for everyday photography, travel, and video work, the 24-105mm lens is an excellent investment, especially with its stabilization and macro capabilities. However, if your focus is on sports, wildlife, or you simply need a lightweight telephoto option at a lower price point, the 75-300mm lens offers substantial reach and portability.

