Canon RF 24- vs Canon RF14-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on price and versatility, Canon RF14- wins on weight and image quality.
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers versatility and affordability, while the RF14-35mm excels in image quality and wide-angle performance.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Price
The RF 24-105mm is significantly cheaper.
Versatility
It covers a broader zoom range.
Weight
It is lighter and more portable.
Why Canon RF14- is better
Image Quality
Superior optical performance with L-series construction.
Wide-Angle
Offers ultra-wide coverage from 14mm to 35mm.
Stabilization
Provides up to 5.5 stops of shake correction.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | Canon RF14- |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/4 |
| Max Zoom | 105mm | 35mm |
| Min Focus | 1.5 ft | 0.7 ft |
| Image Stabilization | 5 stops | 5.5 stops |
| Autofocus | STM | USM |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM lens is a versatile option priced at $476.95. It is designed for everyday photography and offers a flexible zoom range that makes it suitable for various shooting scenarios. With its compact design, this lens is particularly appealing for travel and casual video work.
The lens features a built-in Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to five stops of correction, enhancing image sharpness and video stability. The STM stepping motor enables smooth and quiet autofocus, making it an excellent choice for both photography and video recording. Additionally, the lens includes a Center Macro Focus position for close-up shots, expanding creative possibilities.
Overview of the Canon RF14-35mm F4 L IS USM Lens
The Canon RF14-35mm F4 L IS USM lens offers a wide-angle zoom option for $1,398.95, making it about 194% more expensive than the RF 24-105mm lens. This lens is ideal for capturing expansive landscapes, architecture, and various creative projects. It covers an ultra-wide angle from 14mm to 35mm, providing dramatic perspectives for photographers and videographers.
This lens also boasts a robust image stabilization feature, offering up to 5.5 stops of shake correction. It maintains a constant f/4 aperture throughout the zoom range, ensuring high image quality. With a minimum focusing distance of 7.9 inches and a maximum magnification of 0.38x, it allows for impressive close-up shots while maintaining versatility in various shooting conditions.
Image Quality Comparison
When it comes to image quality, the Canon RF14-35mm F4 L IS USM lens is designed to deliver superior performance. With L-series optical construction and advanced coatings like SWC and ASC, it minimizes ghosting and aberrations for exceptional clarity. The constant f/4 aperture allows for consistently high-quality images across the entire zoom range.
In contrast, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM lens, while versatile, features a variable aperture that may not perform as well in low-light situations compared to the RF14-35mm. The RF 24-105mm is excellent for general use but may not match the optical quality delivered by the RF14-35mm in demanding conditions.
Versatility in Focal Lengths
The RF 24-105mm’s zoom range of 24-105mm allows photographers to capture a variety of scenes without needing to switch lenses. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for travel photographers who want to cover wide-angle shots, portraits, and close-ups all in one go.
On the other hand, the RF14-35mm is exclusively a wide-angle lens, ranging from 14mm to 35mm. While this narrow range is great for expansive shots, it may limit its versatility in capturing subjects at varying distances. Thus, if your photography style requires a broader focal range, the RF 24-105mm may be the better choice.
Weight and Portability
The Canon RF 24-105mm weighs significantly less than the RF14-35mm, making it easier to carry for extended periods. Its compact design is ideal for travel and everyday use, allowing photographers to shoot comfortably without feeling burdened.
The RF14-35mm, while also relatively compact at approximately 1.2 lbs, is still heavier than the RF 24-105mm. If portability is a priority for you, especially when traveling, the RF 24-105mm could be more suitable for your needs.
Autofocus Performance
Both lenses feature advanced autofocus systems, but they cater to different needs. The RF 24-105mm utilizes a smooth STM stepping motor that ensures quiet and precise focus transitions, making it ideal for videographers who need to avoid distracting noise during recording.
In contrast, the RF14-35mm’s autofocus is optimized for high-speed performance, which can be advantageous in dynamic shooting situations, such as event photography or vlogging. While both lenses perform admirably, your choice may depend on whether you prioritize quiet operation or speed in autofocus performance.
Price Comparison
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is priced at $476.95, making it a significantly more budget-friendly option compared to the RF14-35mm, which retails for $1,398.95. This price difference of about $921 is substantial and may influence your decision, especially if you are looking for a versatile lens without breaking the bank.
Choosing the RF 24-105mm allows you to invest in other photography gear or accessories. However, if budget is less of a concern and you’re focused on premium wide-angle performance, the RF14-35mm justifies its higher price with advanced features and optical quality.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM lens and the Canon RF14-35mm F4 L IS USM lens ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If versatility, portability, and budget are your primary concerns, the RF 24-105mm is an excellent choice, offering a wide zoom range and lightweight design at a reasonable price of $476.95.
Conversely, if you seek superior image quality and advanced features in a wide-angle format, the RF14-35mm lens, despite its higher price of $1,398.95, provides exceptional optical performance. Assess your shooting style and budget to make the best decision for your photography endeavors.

