vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs Laowa

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on weight and focal length, Laowa wins on price and field of view.

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers versatility and affordability, while the Laowa 12mm excels in ultra-wide-angle performance and low-light capabilities.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Price

Canon is $222.05 cheaper than Laowa

Versatility

Canon covers wide to short-telephoto

Weight

Canon is lighter and more portable

Why Laowa is better

Aperture

Laowa has a brighter f/2.8 aperture

Field of View

Laowa offers a 122° field of view

Distortion

Laowa has virtually zero distortion

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
78
Laowa
85

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-Laowa
Max Aperturef/4-7.1f/2.8
Image StabilizationYesNo
AutofocusSTMYes
Macro Capability1:20.21x
Control RingYesNo

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-Laowa

Overview of Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite Zero-D

When comparing the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite Zero-D FF Ultra-Wide Angle Lens, we see two distinct lenses tailored for specific photography needs. The Canon lens is versatile and well-suited for everyday photography, while the Laowa lens excels in ultra-wide-angle shots. Priced at $476.95, the Canon lens is about 31% cheaper than the Laowa lens, which retails for $699.00.

Design and Build Quality

Both lenses exhibit thoughtful design suited to their intended use. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is compact and lightweight, making it ideal for travel and everyday carry. Its design incorporates a built-in Optical Image Stabilizer, enhancing shooting comfort in varying conditions. In contrast, the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite Zero-D lens is slightly heavier at 377g but maintains a compact structure, emphasizing portability for landscape and architectural photography. The build quality in both lenses reflects their respective purposes: the Canon lens is designed for versatility, while the Laowa lens focuses on delivering ultra-wide perspectives with minimal distortion.

Focal Length and Versatility

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens offers a versatile focal length range from wide-angle to short-telephoto, making it suitable for a variety of photography styles, including landscapes, portraits, and casual video work. This flexibility is a standout feature for those who prefer a multi-functional lens. Meanwhile, the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite Zero-D lens specializes in ultra-wide-angle photography, boasting a 122° field of view, which is unparalleled for capturing expansive scenes. While the Canon lens can adapt to numerous scenarios, the Laowa lens is tailored for specific situations, thereby limiting its versatility but excelling in its niche.

Aperture Performance

The Canon lens features a variable maximum aperture of f/4-7.1, which allows for decent performance in various lighting conditions but may struggle in low-light environments. Conversely, the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite lens offers a bright maximum aperture of f/2.8, enhancing its low-light capabilities and depth control. This fast aperture makes the Laowa lens particularly appealing for photographers who frequently shoot in dimly lit settings or desire creative background blur. Thus, while the Canon offers flexibility, the Laowa lens excels in low-light situations.

Autofocus and Usability

Autofocus performance is a significant aspect of both lenses. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens utilizes an STM stepping motor that delivers smooth and quiet autofocus, which is particularly beneficial for video recording as it ensures unobtrusive focus transitions. Additionally, the lens features full-time manual focus override, allowing for precise adjustments. Meanwhile, the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite lens is designed with autofocus capabilities, making it user-friendly for those who appreciate quick focusing in dynamic environments. However, the lack of detailed autofocus specs in the Laowa lens may leave some photographers wanting more information on its performance compared to the Canon.

Creative Features

In the realm of creative features, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens includes a unique Center Macro Focus position, enabling close-up shooting with a maximum magnification of 1:2. This feature is beneficial for capturing intricate details in subjects like food or small objects. Additionally, the configurable Control Ring allows for intuitive adjustments of exposure settings. On the other hand, the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite lens offers dual aperture options with a 5-blade design for distinct sunstars or a 14-blade version for smoother bokeh effects. This flexibility in aperture design allows photographers to tailor their images creatively, though the Canon lens may have the edge in functionality for everyday use.

Price Comparison

Price is a crucial factor for many photographers when selecting a lens. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is priced at $476.95, which is about 31% lower than the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite lens, priced at $699.00. This significant price difference can be a deciding factor for those on a budget or looking for a versatile lens without breaking the bank. While both lenses cater to different needs, the cost-effectiveness of the Canon lens makes it appealing for a broader audience.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite Zero-D lens ultimately hinges on your photographic needs. If you require a versatile lens that can adapt to various shooting conditions, the Canon lens is a reliable choice, especially at its lower price point of $476.95. However, if your focus is on ultra-wide-angle photography with exceptional low-light performance and minimal distortion, the Laowa lens, despite its higher price of $699.00, may be worth the investment. Each lens brings unique strengths to the table, so your choice should reflect your specific photography style and requirements.