Canon RF 24- vs Meike
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on stabilization and versatility, Meike wins on price and low-light.
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers greater versatility and features, while the Meike 50mm lens excels in low-light portrait photography at a lower price.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Versatility
Canon lens covers a wider focal range.
Image Stabilization
Canon lens has built-in stabilization.
Autofocus Performance
Canon lens offers smoother AF for video.
Why Meike is better
Price
Meike lens is significantly cheaper.
Low-Light Performance
Meike lens has a larger aperture.
Portrait Focus
Meike lens is optimized for portrait photography.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | Meike |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 50mm |
| Aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/1.8 |
| Weight | 1.48 lbs | 0.88 lbs |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Motor Type | STM | STM |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the Lenses
In the world of photography, selecting the right lens can elevate your creative pursuits. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Meike 50mm F1.8 Auto Focus STM Stepping Motor Full Frame Portrait Lens cater to different photography styles and preferences. This comparison will explore their features, usability, and suitability for various photographic needs.
Design and Build Quality
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is designed for versatility, presenting a compact and lightweight form, ideal for travel and everyday photography. Its zoom range spans from wide-angle to short-telephoto, making it adaptable for various shooting scenarios. In contrast, the Meike 50mm lens, while also compact, is specifically a prime lens that emphasizes portrait photography with its F1.8 aperture. Both lenses are built with user-friendly features, but the Canon lens’s zoom capability provides a broader range of creative options.
Image Stabilization
One of the standout features of the Canon RF 24-105mm lens is its built-in Optical Image Stabilizer, which offers up to five stops of correction. This feature significantly reduces camera shake in low-light conditions, enhancing sharpness for still images and providing smoother video footage. On the other hand, the Meike 50mm does not mention any stabilization features, which may limit its usability for handheld photography in challenging lighting. Thus, if stability is a priority, the Canon lens has a distinct advantage.
Focusing Performance
The Canon RF 24-105mm utilizes a smooth and quiet STM stepping motor that provides precise autofocus performance, making it suitable for both photography and video recording. Its full-time manual focus override allows for fine adjustments, which is beneficial for hybrid content creators. Conversely, the Meike 50mm lens also features an STM motor but is geared towards quick AF/MF switching, emphasizing portrait and street photography. While both lenses offer reliable focus mechanisms, the Canon's versatility in various settings gives it the edge.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Meike 50mm's F1.8 aperture allows for fast shutter speeds and excellent low-light performance, producing beautiful background blur with its nine aperture blades. This feature is particularly attractive for portrait photographers looking to isolate subjects and create pleasing bokeh effects. The Canon RF 24-105mm, with its variable maximum aperture of f/4-7.1, is less capable in low-light situations compared to the Meike. Therefore, for low-light and portrait-focused photography, the Meike has a clear advantage.
Compatibility and Versatility
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is specifically designed for full-frame Canon RF-mount mirrorless cameras, making it a dedicated choice for Canon users. It is versatile enough for various photography styles, from landscapes to casual video work. In contrast, the Meike 50mm lens is compatible with Nikon Z mount cameras, including the Z50, Z6, and Z7 series. While both lenses cater to their respective camera systems, the Canon lens’s zoom range and adaptability across different scenarios make it a more versatile choice overall.
Pricing and Value
At $476.95, the Canon RF 24-105mm lens is significantly more expensive than the Meike 50mm, which retails for $159.99. This places the Meike at about 67% cheaper than the Canon, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious photographers or those just starting in portrait photography. However, the Canon lens offers a broader range of capabilities and features, which may justify its higher price for serious enthusiasts and professionals.
User Experience and Target Audience
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is designed for photographers looking for an all-in-one solution, ideal for travel, street photography, and everyday moments. Its features cater well to hybrid content creators who need both still and video capabilities. The Meike 50mm lens, while excellent for portraits and low-light situations, may appeal more to niche photographers focusing specifically on portrait or street photography. Thus, the choice between the two largely depends on the user's specific needs and style.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, your choice between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Meike 50mm F1.8 Auto Focus STM Stepping Motor Full Frame Portrait Lens hinges on your photography requirements. If versatility, image stabilization, and a broader focal range are your priorities, the Canon lens is the clear winner despite its higher price. However, if you are primarily focused on portrait photography and require exceptional low-light performance at a budget-friendly price, the Meike lens presents an appealing option.

