Canon RF 24- vs Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on price, Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- wins on weight and zoom.
The Canon RF 24-105mm is a versatile and budget-friendly option, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm excels in zoom capabilities and stabilization. Choose based on your photography needs.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $476.95.
Weight
Canon is compact and lightweight for travel.
Versatility
Canon covers a wide range of everyday photography needs.
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- is better
Zoom Range
Nikon offers a 14.2x zoom from 28mm to 400mm.
Stabilization
Nikon provides superior stabilization with up to 5.5 stops.
Minimum Focus
Nikon allows closer shots with a 0.2m minimum focus distance.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 28-400mm |
| Aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/4-8 |
| Image Stabilization | 5 stops | 5.5 stops |
| Autofocus | STM Motor | Linear MF Drive |
| Minimum Focus | 0.3m | 0.2m |
Dimension comparison
Overview
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Mirrorless Lens represent two different approaches to versatile photography. The Canon lens is priced at $476.95, making it about 63% cheaper than the Nikon lens, which retails for $1,296.95. This price difference suggests that you can invest significantly less in the Canon while still achieving a broad range of photographic capabilities.
Focal Length Range
The Canon RF 24-105mm provides a flexible focal length range from wide-angle to short-telephoto, covering essential photography needs for everyday use. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm offers an impressive 14.2x zoom range, allowing users to shoot from 28mm all the way to 400mm. This extensive range makes the Nikon particularly suited for wildlife and sports photography, where distance can be crucial. While the Canon excels in versatility for casual photography, the Nikon stands out for subjects that require significant zoom capabilities.
Image Stabilization
Image stabilization is a critical feature for both lenses, and they approach it differently. The Canon RF 24-105mm incorporates an Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to five stops of correction, enhancing low-light shooting and improving video stability. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm also boasts impressive stabilization, with VR performance equivalent to a 5.0-stop increase in shutter speed. When paired with compatible Nikon cameras, it can achieve up to 5.5-stop stabilization. While both lenses effectively reduce camera shake, the Nikon's superior stabilization could be more beneficial for extended handheld shooting in challenging lighting conditions.
Autofocus Performance
Autofocus is another area where these lenses shine, albeit with different technologies. The Canon RF 24-105mm uses a smooth STM stepping motor for quiet and precise autofocus performance, making it suitable for both photography and video recording. The Nikon lens supports linear MF drive, which enables smooth focusing—especially useful for video. While both lenses are designed to deliver accurate autofocus, the Canon's STM motor may offer a quieter operation, which is essential for video shooting in quiet environments, whereas the Nikon might appeal more to those who prioritize versatility in video and photography.
Weight and Portability
When considering weight and portability, the Canon RF 24-105mm is compact and lightweight, making it an ideal choice for travel photography. However, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm, despite its extensive zoom range, is also designed for easy handheld shooting, weighing approximately 1.6 lbs (725 g). This makes it the lightest lens in its class. For photographers who value portability without sacrificing zoom capabilities, the Nikon lens offers a compelling option, while the Canon is also highly portable, perfect for everyday use.
Subject Versatility
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is designed for a variety of subjects, from landscapes to portraits, and even casual video work. Its adaptable zoom range makes it a solid choice for daily photography needs. On the other hand, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm excels in situations where a broader focal range is necessary, such as wildlife or sports photography. The Nikon's ability to get close to subjects with a minimum focus distance of 0.2 m at wide-angle enhances its capability to capture dynamic expressions, making it ideal for various shooting scenarios.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the two lenses is significant, with the Canon RF 24-105mm lens costing $476.95 compared to the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm lens at $1,296.95. This translates to a difference of about $820, making the Canon lens about 63% less expensive. For those on a budget or looking for a versatile everyday lens, the Canon offers great value without compromising quality. In contrast, the Nikon's higher price point may reflect its advanced features and extensive zoom range, appealing to more specialized photography needs.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Mirrorless Lens ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If you are looking for a versatile, cost-effective lens for everyday use, the Canon is the clear winner. However, if your focus is on capturing distant subjects or engaging in wildlife photography, the Nikon's extensive zoom range and superior stabilization may justify the higher price. Consider your typical shooting scenarios and budget to determine which lens aligns best with your photographic aspirations.

