vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs Sigma

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on versatility and weight, Sigma wins on size and build.

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers greater versatility and value, while the Sigma lens excels in low-light performance.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Price

Canon lens is $62.05 cheaper

Versatility

Canon lens covers a wider zoom range

Included Accessories

Canon lens includes a memory card and bag

Why Sigma is better

Aperture

Sigma lens has a larger maximum aperture

Low-Light

Sigma lens performs better in low-light conditions

Image Quality

Sigma lens offers superior image quality at f/1.4

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
85
Sigma
78

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-Sigma
Max Aperturef/4-7.1f/1.4
Focal Length24-105mm16mm
Image StabilizationYesNo
AutofocusSTMFast Hybrid AF
Macro FocusYesNo

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-Sigma

Introduction to the Lenses

When comparing camera lenses, understanding the specific requirements of your photography style is crucial. In this comparison, we will look at two versatile options: the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Sony E. Each lens has its strengths and caters to different types of photography, making it essential to evaluate their features and benefits.

Price Comparison

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is priced at $476.95, while the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens is listed at $539.00. This indicates that the Canon lens is about 11.5% cheaper than the Sigma lens. When considering your budget, this difference could be significant, especially for photographers looking to maximize their investment. The Canon lens also includes a 64GB memory card and a camera bag, adding further value to the package.

Build and Design

In terms of build and design, both lenses are compact and portable, but they serve different purposes. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is designed for versatility, covering a wider zoom range from wide-angle to short-telephoto. Its lightweight form makes it ideal for travel and everyday use. On the other hand, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens is a prime lens that emphasizes portability with its compact size. It is specifically tailored for nature and event photography, making it a solid choice for outdoor and dynamic settings.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

One of the most significant differences between these two lenses is their aperture capabilities. The Sigma 16mm f/1.4 has a large maximum aperture of f/1.4, which allows for exceptional low-light performance and depth of field control. This makes it ideal for shooting in dimly lit environments or achieving a beautiful bokeh effect. In contrast, the Canon RF 24-105mm lens has a variable maximum aperture that ranges from f/4 to f/7.1, which is less suitable for low-light conditions but offers flexibility in framing various subjects.

Autofocus and Image Stabilization

Autofocus performance is essential for capturing sharp images, especially in dynamic situations. The Canon RF 24-105mm lens features a smooth STM stepping motor that provides quiet and precise autofocus, making it suitable for both photography and video recording. It also includes a built-in Optical Image Stabilizer that offers up to five stops of correction, significantly reducing camera shake during handheld shooting. Meanwhile, the Sigma lens also accommodates Fast Hybrid AF for smooth autofocusing, particularly beneficial for video shooting. However, it lacks optical stabilization, which could affect handheld shooting in low-light situations.

Versatility in Photography

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens excels in versatility, making it a great all-rounder for various photography styles. Its zoom range allows photographers to seamlessly transition between landscapes, portraits, and close-up shots without needing to change lenses. It even features a dedicated Center Macro Focus position for close-up photography with a maximum magnification of 1:2. Conversely, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is specifically designed for wide-angle shooting, making it perfect for landscapes, architecture, and events. While it offers fantastic image quality, its fixed focal length may limit versatility compared to the Canon lens.

Target Audience

Understanding the target audience for each lens can help in making a more informed choice. The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is geared towards everyday photographers who enjoy a range of subjects, from family moments to travel photography. Its bundle, which includes a memory card and camera bag, also appeals to new photographers looking for a complete setup. In contrast, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 lens caters to those who specifically require a wide-angle prime lens for professional-quality images, especially in low-light scenarios. It is an excellent choice for enthusiasts who prioritize image quality over zoom versatility.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you value versatility, a broader zoom range, and image stabilization, the Canon lens at $476.95 is a better fit. However, if you prioritize low-light performance and have a specific focus on wide-angle photography, the Sigma lens at $539.00 offers superior aperture capabilities and image quality. Consider your preferred shooting style and budget to make the best choice for your photography journey.