Canon RF 24- vs Sigma 28-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on stabilization and max aperture, Sigma 28- wins on price and focal length.
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers greater versatility and image stabilization at a lower price, making it a better choice for everyday photographers. The Sigma lens excels in optical performance but comes at a higher cost.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Price
Canon lens is $383 cheaper
Versatility
Canon covers 24mm to 105mm
Image Stabilization
Canon has built-in stabilization
Why Sigma 28- is better
Aperture
Sigma has a constant f/2.8 aperture
Build Quality
Sigma features superb build quality
Optical Performance
Sigma rivals Art line lenses
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | Sigma 28- |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Sigma |
| Max Aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/2.8 |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 28-70mm |
| Weight | Light | Light |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is a versatile option ideal for everyday photography and travel. Priced at $476.95, it offers a flexible zoom range from wide-angle to short-telephoto perspectives, making it a great companion for various shooting scenarios. The lens is designed to cater to both amateur and professional photographers, featuring a lightweight and compact design that enhances portability.
This lens is equipped with a built-in Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to five stops of correction. This feature significantly reduces camera shake, especially when shooting handheld in low-light conditions. Additionally, it supports smooth and quiet autofocus performance thanks to its STM stepping motor, making it suitable for video recording as well. With a unique Center Macro Focus position, it allows for close-up shots with a maximum magnification of 1:2, making it a versatile choice for capturing intricate details.
Overview of the Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN for Sony E
The Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN for Sony E is a high-quality lens priced at $859.95, which makes it about 80% more expensive than the Canon lens. This large-aperture standard zoom lens focuses on delivering excellent optical performance throughout its range, making it ideal for both everyday use and more serious photography needs. With a constant maximum aperture of f/2.8, it allows for better low-light performance and more control over depth of field compared to the Canon lens.
Weighing in as a lightweight and compact option, the Sigma lens is designed for ease of use, especially for those who carry their gear for extended periods. It features superb build quality along with advanced coatings that help reduce flare and ghosting. The lens also includes a Focus Mode Switch for quick adjustments, enhancing user experience and versatility.
Image Stabilization Features
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens excels in image stabilization with its built-in Optical Image Stabilizer, which offers up to five stops of correction. This feature is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting, making it easier to capture sharp images in low-light conditions. The stabilization also enhances video quality by producing smoother footage without the need for additional support equipment.
In comparison, the Sigma 28-70mm lens lacks a specific image stabilization feature. While it does provide excellent optical performance, users may find it more challenging to shoot in low-light environments without the assistance of a tripod or other stabilization equipment. Therefore, if image stabilization is a priority for your photography or videography needs, the Canon lens has a distinct advantage.
Autofocus Performance
The autofocus system in the Canon RF 24-105mm lens is driven by a smooth STM stepping motor, which enables quiet and precise autofocus performance. This characteristic is particularly beneficial for video recording, as it ensures natural focus transitions that don't distract from the content being filmed. The lens also features full-time manual focus override, allowing users to make fine adjustments as needed, which is advantageous for vloggers and hybrid content creators.
On the other hand, the Sigma 28-70mm lens emphasizes superb build quality and optical performance but does not specify its autofocus capabilities in the same detail as the Canon lens. While Sigma lenses generally maintain a good reputation for autofocus, the absence of specific information regarding the autofocus motor and performance means that the Canon lens may be a more reliable option for those who prioritize autofocus in their shooting experience.
Versatility in Focal Length
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens provides a versatile zoom range from wide-angle (24mm) to short-telephoto (105mm). This flexibility makes it suitable for various types of photography, including landscapes, portraits, and close-up shots. Its ability to cover multiple focal lengths without the need to switch lenses is a significant advantage for travelers and casual photographers alike.
In contrast, the Sigma 28-70mm lens offers a more limited focal length range. While it covers a useful range from 28mm to 70mm, it lacks the wide-angle capabilities of the Canon lens. This limitation could be a drawback for photographers who frequently shoot in diverse environments, as they may need an additional lens to achieve the same versatility provided by the Canon RF 24-105mm.
Build Quality and Design
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it comfortable for extended shooting sessions. It includes a configurable Control Ring that allows users to adjust exposure settings quickly, enhancing usability during creative processes. Additionally, the rounded seven-blade diaphragm contributes to pleasing background blur, further improving the quality of images.
The Sigma 28-70mm lens also boasts superb build quality, with an emphasis on lightweight design. Its Nano Porous Coating helps reduce lens flare and ghosting, ensuring that image quality remains high even in challenging lighting conditions. Both lenses offer excellent construction, but the Canon lens's additional features for ease of use and creativity may provide a more satisfying experience overall.
Price Comparison
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is priced at $476.95, making it a more budget-friendly option when compared to the Sigma 28-70mm lens, which costs $859.95. This price difference of $383 is significant, representing about a 44% savings for those opting for the Canon lens. For photographers who are looking for a versatile and capable lens without breaking the bank, the Canon option stands out as an appealing choice.
In contrast, the Sigma lens, while more expensive, is often regarded for its outstanding optical performance and low-light capabilities. This could justify the higher price for professionals who require a lens that delivers top-tier results consistently.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN for Sony E ultimately depends on your photography needs and budget. The Canon lens offers greater versatility in focal length, excellent image stabilization, and a lower price point, making it suitable for everyday photographers and travelers. On the other hand, the Sigma lens provides a constant f/2.8 aperture and solid build quality, which may appeal more to professionals seeking optimal optical performance. If budget is a significant concern, the Canon lens is the clear winner, whereas the Sigma lens could be worth the investment for those prioritizing low-light performance and image quality.

