vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs Sony FE

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on focal range and stabilization, Sony FE wins on price.

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens offers greater versatility and value for everyday use, while the Sony FE 16mm f/1.8 G excels in specialized ultra-wide-angle photography.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Price

Canon is $476.95 vs Sony's $898.00

Versatility

Canon covers a wider focal range

Stabilization

Canon has built-in Optical Image Stabilizer

Why Sony FE is better

Bokeh

Sony offers beautiful bokeh at f/1.8

Weight

Sony is lighter at 304g

Close-up

Sony has a shorter minimum focus distance

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
85
Sony FE
78

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-Sony FE
BrandCanonSony
TypeZoomPrime
Max Aperturef/4-7.1f/1.8
Image StabilizationYesNo
AutofocusSTMXD Motors

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-Sony FE

Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and Sony FE 16mm f/1.8 G

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is priced at $476.95, making it about 47% cheaper than the Sony FE 16mm f/1.8 G, which retails for $898.00. This price difference suggests that the Canon lens offers significant value for those on a budget while still providing a versatile zoom range suited for various photography styles.

The Canon RF 24-105mm is designed for full-frame Canon RF-mount mirrorless cameras and is particularly versatile, covering wide-angle to short-telephoto focal lengths. It is ideal for everyday photography, travel, and casual video. In contrast, the Sony FE 16mm is a prime lens that excels in ultra-wide-angle photography and is particularly suited for landscapes, architecture, and astrophotography.

Design and Build Quality

When it comes to design and build quality, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens features a compact and lightweight form, perfect for travel and extended use. The lens includes a configurable Control Ring for easy adjustments, enhancing user experience. On the other hand, the Sony FE 16mm f/1.8 G is also compact, weighing only 304 g (10.8 oz.), making it easy to balance on a gimbal.

Both lenses are built to accommodate the needs of photographers on the go. However, the versatility of the Canon lens—with its zoom capability—often outweighs the fixed nature of the Sony lens. The design of the Canon lens allows for seamless transitions between different types of photography without needing to change lenses, which can be a significant advantage.

Optical Performance

In terms of optical performance, the Canon RF 24-105mm offers a versatile zoom range that adapts to various shooting conditions. Its built-in Optical Image Stabilizer provides up to five stops of correction, aiding in capturing sharp images even in low-light situations. This feature is beneficial for both still photography and video, providing smoother footage.

The Sony FE 16mm f/1.8 G excels in creating beautiful bokeh at its maximum aperture of f/1.8, which enhances its performance in low-light environments and portrait photography. With two Advanced Aspherical (AA) lenses, it minimizes field curvature and astigmatism, ensuring stunning resolution. Each lens has its strengths; while the Canon is more versatile, the Sony lens offers exceptional clarity and depth of field control.

Autofocus Capabilities

Autofocus performance is another crucial aspect to consider. The Canon RF 24-105mm lens features a smooth and quiet STM motor, which delivers precise autofocus for both photography and video recording. This is particularly advantageous for vloggers or hybrid content creators who require unobtrusive focus transitions.

Conversely, the Sony FE 16mm f/1.8 G incorporates two XD linear motors for fast, precise, and silent autofocus. This capability supports high-level imaging, which is essential for capturing action or fleeting moments. While both lenses provide excellent autofocus, the choice may depend on the specific shooting needs—Canon for versatility and ease of use, Sony for speed and precision.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Sony FE 16mm f/1.8 G is quite pronounced. At $476.95, the Canon lens is about 47% less expensive than the Sony lens, which is priced at $898.00. This substantial difference makes the Canon lens an attractive option for those who want a quality lens without breaking the bank.

Given the wide range of applications that the Canon lens covers, it provides excellent value for everyday photographers and videographers. Meanwhile, the Sony lens, while more expensive, may appeal to those who specialize in specific genres like landscape or architectural photography, where the ultra-wide angle and fast aperture shine.

Use Cases

The Canon RF 24-105mm is versatile enough for travel, street photography, family portraits, and even casual video work. Its flexible zoom range allows photographers to easily switch between landscapes, portraits, and close-ups without needing to change lenses, making it an ideal all-in-one solution.

In contrast, the Sony FE 16mm f/1.8 G is perfect for capturing expansive scenes, such as landscapes or architecture, and excels in low-light conditions thanks to its fast aperture. Its close-up capability and beautiful bokeh make it a favorite among photographers who focus on artistic shots. Each lens serves distinct needs, and the choice will depend on the photographer’s specific focus.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Sony FE 16mm f/1.8 G ultimately boils down to your photography needs and budget. The Canon lens offers versatility, a lower price point at $476.95, and a broad focal range, making it suitable for various photography styles and everyday use. Meanwhile, the Sony lens is an excellent choice for those who prioritize ultra-wide-angle shots with stunning bokeh, albeit at a higher price of $898.00. If your budget allows, the Sony lens is outstanding for specialized tasks; however, for general use and travel-friendly versatility, the Canon lens is hard to beat.