vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs Tamron 150-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on stabilization and macro, Tamron 150- wins on price and zoom range.

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers versatility and value, while the Tamron 150-500mm excels in ultra-telephoto capabilities. Choose based on your specific photography needs.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Price

Canon lens is about 60% cheaper than Tamron.

Versatility

Canon lens is suitable for a variety of photography styles.

Close-Up

Canon lens has macro capabilities for detailed shots.

Why Tamron 150- is better

Telephoto

Tamron lens reaches up to 500mm for wildlife photography.

Image Quality

Tamron lens maintains high image quality at long distances.

Autofocus Speed

Tamron lens features high-speed autofocus for action shots.

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
85
Tamron 150-
78

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-Tamron 150-
Focal Length24-105mm150-500mm
Aperturef/4-7.1f/5-6.7
Image StabilizationYesYes
Autofocus TypeSTMVXD
Max Magnification1:2N/A

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-Tamron 150-

Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD Lens

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens offers versatility for everyday photography, while the Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD Lens is a powerful ultra-telephoto option. At $476.95, the Canon lens is about 60% cheaper than the Tamron lens, which retails for $1,199.00. This significant price difference reflects the distinct focal lengths and intended uses of each lens.

Intended Use and Versatility

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is designed for a variety of photography styles, making it ideal for travel, street photography, and family moments. Its zoom range from wide-angle to short-telephoto allows for seamless transitions between landscapes and portraits. In contrast, the Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD Lens is tailored for ultra-telephoto photography, reaching up to 500mm, which is perfect for wildlife and sports photography. This specialization makes the Tamron lens less versatile for everyday use compared to the Canon lens.

Image Stabilization Features

Image stabilization is crucial for achieving sharp images, especially in low-light conditions. The Canon RF 24-105mm lens includes a built-in Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to five stops of correction, making it beneficial for handheld shooting. On the other hand, the Tamron lens features Vibration Compensation (VC) for stabilizing images at long focal lengths, ensuring clarity even when shooting at 500mm. Both lenses excel in stabilization, but the Canon lens's five-stop capability may offer more flexibility for casual shooters.

Autofocus Performance

Autofocus performance is a critical factor for both photography and videography. The Canon RF 24-105mm lens utilizes a Smooth STM (Stepping Motor) for quiet and precise autofocus, making it suitable for video recording as well as stills. This results in natural focus transitions, which is especially useful for vlogging. In comparison, the Tamron 150-500mm lens employs a Voice-coil eXtreme-torque Drive (VXD) for high-speed, high-precision autofocus, ensuring that you won’t miss a moment. While both lenses provide excellent autofocus, the Canon lens may be favored by content creators due to its quieter operation.

Build Quality and Design

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is compact and lightweight, making it comfortable for extended shooting sessions. Its design is tailored for everyday use, perfect for travel without sacrificing functionality. Conversely, the Tamron 150-500mm lens, while compact for a 500mm lens, is still heavier and bulkier than the Canon lens. This makes it less ideal for casual outings where portability is a concern. The Canon lens's design promotes ease of use, especially for those new to photography.

Close-Up Capabilities

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens boasts a Center Macro Focus position, allowing for close-up shooting with a maximum magnification of 1:2. This feature is particularly useful for capturing details in food photography or small subjects. The Tamron 150-500mm lens does not specify macro capabilities in its features, focusing primarily on long-distance shots. For photographers interested in versatility and detail-oriented work, the Canon lens offers a distinct advantage in close-up photography.

Pricing and Value

The pricing difference between the two lenses is significant, with the Canon RF 24-105mm lens priced at $476.95 and the Tamron 150-500mm lens at $1,199.00. This makes the Canon lens about 60% cheaper, providing great value for photographers looking for a versatile standard zoom lens. While the Tamron lens offers impressive ultra-telephoto capabilities, the cost may be prohibitive for casual users who may benefit more from the Canon's flexibility.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD Lens comes down to your specific photography needs. If you seek versatility for everyday photography and video work, the Canon lens is the clear choice at $476.95. However, if your focus is on ultra-telephoto shots, particularly wildlife or sports, the Tamron lens provides excellent performance at a higher price point of $1,199.00. Ultimately, the decision hinges on whether you prioritize versatility or specialized focal length capabilities.