Canon RF 24- vs Tamron 70-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on weight and build quality, Tamron 70- wins on focal range and length.
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens excels in versatility and image stabilization, while the Tamron 70-300mm offers a longer zoom range at a lower price. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Image Stabilization
Canon lens features built-in stabilization.
Versatility
Canon lens covers wide-angle to short telephoto.
Autofocus
Canon lens has smooth STM autofocus.
Why Tamron 70- is better
Price
Tamron lens is $77.95 cheaper.
Weight
Tamron lens is lighter at 19.2 oz.
Zoom Range
Tamron lens offers up to 300mm focal length.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | Tamron 70- |
|---|---|---|
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Autofocus Type | STM | RXD |
| Max Magnification | 1:2 | 1:5.1 |
| Control Ring | Yes | No |
| Moisture Resistance | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is priced at $476.95 and is designed for versatility in everyday photography and casual video creation. This lens offers a wide range of focal lengths from wide-angle to short telephoto, making it suitable for various shooting scenarios, including travel and family moments. It features a built-in Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to five stops of correction, enhancing image sharpness in low-light conditions. The STM stepping motor ensures smooth and quiet autofocus, ideal for both photography and video. With its compact design and multiple features, this lens provides excellent functionality for both amateur and professional photographers.
Overview of the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD
The Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD is priced at $399.00, making it about 17% cheaper than the Canon lens. This telephoto zoom lens is designed specifically for Sony full-frame and APS-C E-mount mirrorless cameras. It is noted for its lightweight design, measuring only 5.8 inches long and weighing just 19.2 ounces, allowing for easy portability and comfortable shooting. The lens offers impressive image quality with 15 elements arranged to minimize chromatic aberration and other distortions. The RXD (Rapid eXtra-silent stepping Drive) autofocus system is not only fast but also remarkably quiet, making it suitable for a variety of shooting conditions, such as wildlife and sports photography.
Image Stabilization and Autofocus Performance
When it comes to image stabilization and autofocus, the Canon RF 24-105mm lens features a built-in Optical Image Stabilizer with up to five stops of correction. This capability significantly reduces camera shake, especially in low-light environments and at longer focal lengths. In contrast, the Tamron lens does not specify built-in stabilization but leverages its lightweight design and RXD autofocus system for smooth operation. While the Canon lens is well-suited for handheld shooting, the Tamron offers a longer zoom range, allowing photographers to capture distant subjects effectively. The choice between these two lenses may depend on whether you prioritize stabilization or an extended focal range.
Versatility in Focal Lengths
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 offers a versatile focal length range that covers wide-angle to short telephoto perspectives, making it an ideal choice for various photography styles, from landscapes to portraits. The lens excels in everyday scenarios, allowing users to switch between different types of shots without needing to change lenses. On the other hand, the Tamron 70-300mm lens provides a much longer zoom range, reaching up to 300mm, which is perfect for capturing distant subjects like wildlife and sports. This significant difference in focal length capabilities can be a deciding factor for photographers who need greater reach in their shots.
Build Quality and Design
In terms of design, the Canon RF 24-105mm lens is compact and lightweight, making it easy to carry during extended shooting sessions. Its user-friendly features, like a configurable Control Ring for quick adjustments to exposure settings, enhance the shooting experience. The Tamron 70-300mm lens also emphasizes portability, being the smallest and lightest in its class. It boasts a moisture-resistant construction, which adds durability and reliability for outdoor use. Both lenses are designed with user convenience in mind, but the specific needs for weather resistance and size may sway your choice.
Ideal Use Cases
The Canon RF 24-105mm is particularly well-suited for travel, street photography, and family events, thanks to its adaptable focal range and image stabilization. It's an excellent all-rounder for photographers who want to capture a variety of scenes without the hassle of changing lenses frequently. Conversely, the Tamron 70-300mm is tailored more for telephoto applications, making it ideal for sports, wildlife, and portrait photography where distance is crucial. Depending on your typical shooting scenarios, one lens may be significantly more beneficial than the other.
Price Considerations
With the Canon lens retailing at $476.95 and the Tamron lens at $399.00, the price difference is notable—about $77.95, or 17%. While the Canon lens offers advanced features like image stabilization and a versatile focal length, the Tamron lens provides excellent value with its longer zoom range and lower price point. This price consideration could heavily influence your purchasing decision, especially if budget constraints are a factor.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD depends on your specific needs and shooting preferences. If you seek versatility and image stabilization for everyday photography, the Canon lens is an excellent option. However, if you require a lightweight telephoto lens with a longer zoom range at a more affordable price, the Tamron lens could be the better choice. Both lenses have their strengths, and understanding how you plan to use them will guide you toward the right decision.

