Canon RF 24- vs TTARTISAN
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- leads on price and weight.
The Canon RF 24-105mm offers versatility and advanced features, while the TTARTISAN 40mm provides excellent value for budget-conscious photographers.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Versatility
Canon covers a wider focal range.
Image Stabilization
Canon has built-in optical image stabilization.
Autofocus
Canon's STM motor provides smoother focus transitions.
Why TTARTISAN is better
Price
TTARTISAN is significantly cheaper.
Portability
TTARTISAN is lighter and more compact.
Low Light
TTARTISAN's f/2 aperture excels in low light.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | TTARTISAN |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/2 |
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 40mm |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Autofocus Type | STM | STM |
| Weight | 500g | 167g |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is a versatile standard zoom lens priced at $476.95. This lens is designed for full-frame Canon RF-mount mirrorless cameras and offers a broad focal range, making it suitable for various photography styles, from landscapes to portraits. With its lightweight and compact design, it is ideal for travel and everyday use. The built-in Optical Image Stabilization provides up to five stops of correction, which is particularly beneficial in low-light situations. Additionally, its smooth and quiet autofocus system enhances both photography and videography experiences.
Overview of the TTARTISAN 40mm f2 Lens for Z Mount
The TTARTISAN 40mm f2 Lens for Z Mount is significantly more affordable at $168.00. This lens is tailored for Nikon Z-mount cameras, delivering a full-frame perspective that closely mimics human vision. Weighing only 167 grams, it is highly portable, making it easy to carry for travel or spontaneous shooting. The f/2 maximum aperture allows for impressive low-light performance and sharp image quality. It also features advanced autofocus capabilities with face and eye tracking, ensuring that it is well-suited for portraiture and video work.
Image Quality Comparison
When it comes to image quality, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM offers versatility across a wider range of focal lengths, which can enhance composition flexibility. Its optical image stabilization improves sharpness, particularly in low-light conditions. The TTARTISAN 40mm f2, however, shines with its bright aperture, producing vivid colors and clarity even in dim environments. While the Canon lens can cover multiple scenarios, the TTARTISAN's specialized prime lens design allows for stunning portraits and textures, especially at close distances.
Autofocus Performance
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM utilizes a smooth STM stepping motor for precise autofocus, making it an excellent choice for both stills and video. This feature is particularly beneficial for vloggers, offering natural focus transitions. In comparison, the TTARTISAN 40mm f2 also boasts advanced autofocus capabilities, including face and eye tracking. This makes it suitable for capturing moving subjects or portraits. While both lenses provide effective autofocus, the choice may depend on the specific shooting context, with the Canon lens offering broader versatility.
Build Quality and Design
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM is designed with practical features like a configurable control ring for quick adjustments, enhancing its usability during shooting. It is constructed to be lightweight yet durable, making it travel-friendly. On the other hand, the TTARTISAN 40mm f2 is crafted from premium 5052 aerospace aluminum, emphasizing portability without compromising on robustness. Its compact design allows it to fit easily into bags, making it ideal for photographers on the go. Both lenses demonstrate solid build quality, but the materials and design philosophies cater to different user needs.
Price and Value Proposition
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM is priced at $476.95, while the TTARTISAN 40mm f2 comes in at $168.00, making it about 65% cheaper. This substantial price difference can influence purchasing decisions, especially for hobbyists or those on a budget. The Canon lens provides extensive versatility across multiple photography genres, but for those seeking a high-quality prime lens at a lower cost, the TTARTISAN offers exceptional value, particularly for portrait and low-light photography.
Target Audience
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM is ideal for photographers who value versatility and the ability to switch between different focal lengths without changing lenses. It is particularly suited for travel photographers and videographers who need a reliable all-in-one solution. Conversely, the TTARTISAN 40mm f2 will appeal to enthusiasts and professionals focusing on portraiture, street photography, or those who prioritize compactness without sacrificing quality. The affordability of the TTARTISAN also makes it a great option for newcomers to photography.
Which should you buy?
The decision between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the TTARTISAN 40mm f2 Lens largely hinges on your specific photographic needs and budget. If you require a versatile zoom lens capable of handling a variety of situations, the Canon RF 24-105mm is the clear choice, despite its higher price. On the other hand, if you're looking for an excellent prime lens at a lower price point and primarily shoot portraits or low-light scenes, the TTARTISAN 40mm f2 offers fantastic value. Ultimately, both lenses have unique strengths, making them suitable for different types of photographers.

