Canon RF 24- vs TTARTISAN AF
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on stability and versatility, TTARTISAN AF wins on weight and size.
The Canon RF 24-105mm offers superior versatility and image stabilization, while the TTARTISAN AF 27mm excels in portability and affordability.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Versatility
Canon lens covers wide-angle to short-telephoto.
Image Stabilization
Canon lens has built-in stabilization.
Autofocus
Canon lens provides smoother focus transitions.
Why TTARTISAN AF is better
Price
TTARTISAN lens is significantly cheaper.
Portability
TTARTISAN lens is ultra-compact.
Simplicity
TTARTISAN lens has a straightforward design.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | TTARTISAN AF |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 27mm |
| Aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/2.8 |
| Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Motor Type | STM | STM |
| Compatibility | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM Lens
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM Lens is priced at $476.95, making it a versatile option for photographers seeking a reliable standard zoom lens. This lens is designed for full-frame Canon RF-mount mirrorless cameras and is ideal for a variety of shooting scenarios, from landscapes to portraits. With features like Optical Image Stabilization and a smooth STM autofocus motor, this lens provides both stability and performance for both photography and video.
Overview of the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 Lens
The TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 lens is significantly more affordable at $159.99, catering to Fujifilm users with its compatibility across multiple X mount cameras. This ultra-compact pancake lens is designed for portability, making it an excellent choice for travel and casual shooting. The lens features an STM stepping motor for smooth focusing, eye recognition focus for better subject tracking, and a unique clicked aperture ring for faster adjustments.
Design and Build Quality
The Canon RF 24-105mm features a compact and lightweight design, making it suitable for extended shooting sessions. Its build quality reflects Canon's reputation for durability and functionality, with a design that accommodates everyday photography needs. In contrast, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 excels in portability, being ultra-compact and designed to fit easily into bags without adding significant weight. While the Canon lens offers a versatile zoom range, the TTARTISAN lens emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, particularly for street and travel photographers.
Versatility in Use
The Canon RF 24-105mm is incredibly versatile, covering a focal length range from wide-angle to short-telephoto, making it suitable for various photography styles. It’s well-equipped for capturing family moments, street photography, and even casual video work. The TTARTISAN AF 27mm, while limited to a fixed focal length, offers a unique perspective that is ideal for street and portrait photography. The lens's ability to recognize faces and eyes adds another layer of usability, particularly for spontaneous shooting situations.
Autofocus Performance
Autofocus performance differs significantly between the two lenses. The Canon RF 24-105mm employs a smooth STM stepping motor, providing quiet and precise autofocus that is especially beneficial for video recording. This feature allows for natural focus transitions, making it suitable for vloggers and hybrid content creators. On the other hand, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 also utilizes an STM motor but adds eye recognition focus, enhancing its ability to track subjects. This feature can be particularly advantageous for portrait photographers aiming to capture sharp images of moving subjects.
Image Stabilization
Image stabilization is a standout feature of the Canon RF 24-105mm, offering up to five stops of correction. This is crucial for handheld shooting, especially in low-light conditions, where camera shake can be a significant issue. The stabilization not only benefits still photography but also improves video footage, allowing for smoother results without needing a tripod. Conversely, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm lacks built-in image stabilization, which may limit its effectiveness in similar low-light scenarios, requiring steadier hands or additional stabilization equipment for optimal performance.
Price Point Comparison
When comparing the price points, the Canon RF 24-105mm is priced at $476.95, while the TTARTISAN AF 27mm is much more budget-friendly at $159.99. This represents a price difference of around 66%, making the TTARTISAN lens about 17% cheaper at $159.99. For photographers who are budget-conscious or looking for a lens for casual use, the TTARTISAN lens presents a compelling value proposition, while the Canon lens offers a broader range of features and capabilities for a higher price.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM Lens and the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 lens ultimately depends on your specific needs as a photographer. If you require versatility, image stabilization, and superior autofocus for various shooting conditions, the Canon lens is a strong choice. However, if you are looking for an ultra-compact lens with a lower price point and a focus on portability, the TTARTISAN lens is an excellent option. Consider your photography style and budget to make the most informed decision.

