Canon RF 75- vs Tamron 150-
Updated July 2026 — Tamron 150- leads on zoom range and filter size.
The Canon RF 75-300mm offers great value and portability, while the Tamron 150-500mm excels in image quality and reach. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Canon RF 75- is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $253.95.
Weight
Canon weighs just over 1 lb, making it more portable.
Close-Focus
Canon has a better close-focusing capability at 4.9'.
Why Tamron 150- is better
Focal Length
Tamron offers a longer focal length of 150-500mm.
Image Quality
Tamron has superior edge-to-edge resolving power.
Autofocus Speed
Tamron's VXD autofocus is faster and more precise.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 75- | Tamron 150- |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $253.95 | $1,199.00 |
| Focal Length | 75-300mm | 150-500mm |
| Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/5-6.7 |
| Autofocus | DC Motor | VXD Linear |
| Close Focus | 4.9' | 23.6" |
Dimension comparison
Overview
The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens and the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD are both excellent telephoto zoom lenses designed for different camera systems. The Canon lens is priced at $253.95, making it significantly cheaper than the Tamron lens, which retails for $1,199.00, approximately 371% more expensive. This price difference is a major factor when considering which lens might be the better option for various photographers.
Build Quality
The Canon RF 75-300mm is lightweight and compact, weighing just over 1 lb, making it easy to carry during travel and everyday photography. It features a 58mm filter thread, which adds to its portability. In contrast, the Tamron 150-500mm, while still relatively compact for its class, extends to 11.3" when fully zoomed, which may require more effort to handle for long periods. The Tamron lens is built with moisture-resistant construction and a fluorine coating for added durability, making it suitable for more rugged shooting conditions.
Image Quality
In terms of image quality, the Canon RF 75-300mm is optimized for sharpness and clarity, supported by Canon’s Super Spectra Coating that minimizes lens flare and ghosting. This lens provides a versatile focal length range from 75-300mm, or 120-480mm on APS-C cameras, allowing for excellent subject isolation and detail. On the other hand, the Tamron 150-500mm boasts exceptional edge-to-edge resolving power and precisely controlled aberrations, ensuring high-quality images throughout its extensive zoom range. The BBAR-G2 coating on the Tamron lens further enhances clarity and contrast.
Autofocus Performance
The autofocus systems of both lenses are tailored for responsive performance, but they employ different technologies. The Canon RF 75-300mm features a DC motor that delivers accurate focusing, making it suitable for both stills and video applications. Meanwhile, the Tamron 150-500mm uses a VXD linear motor autofocus mechanism, which is known for its speed and precision, especially in dynamic shooting situations like sports or wildlife photography. This slight edge in autofocus performance may be crucial for users who prioritize quick subject tracking.
Close-Focusing Capability
The close-focusing abilities of the lenses differ significantly, with the Canon RF 75-300mm offering a 4.9' minimum focus distance and a maximum magnification of 0.25x, making it suitable for semi-macro photography. This feature allows photographers to capture detailed close-ups, adding versatility for various shooting scenarios. In comparison, the Tamron 150-500mm has a minimum object distance of 23.6" at the 150mm end, which limits its macro capabilities but compensates with its ability to achieve a longer focal length for distant subjects.
Versatility
The Canon RF 75-300mm is designed with versatility in mind, covering a focal range that is ideal for sports, wildlife, portraits, and everyday photography. Its lightweight design makes it an excellent travel companion. The Tamron 150-500mm takes versatility a step further by providing a much longer focal reach, perfect for ultra-telephoto shots that require you to stay far from your subject. This long reach is especially beneficial for wildlife photographers who need to photograph animals from a distance without disturbing them.
Price Point
The Canon RF 75-300mm is priced at $253.95, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious photographers looking for a quality telephoto lens. In contrast, the Tamron 150-500mm is priced at $1,199.00, which is about 371% higher than the Canon lens. This steep price difference suggests that the Tamron is aimed at professionals or enthusiasts who require advanced features and longer focal lengths, while the Canon serves those who need a reliable yet affordable telephoto option.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF 75-300mm and the Tamron 150-500mm largely depends on your photography needs and budget. If you seek a lightweight, versatile lens for everyday use at a lower price, the Canon RF 75-300mm is an excellent choice. However, if you require an ultra-telephoto lens with superior image quality and advanced autofocus capabilities for serious wildlife or sports photography, the Tamron 150-500mm justifies its higher price point. Ultimately, both lenses excel in their respective areas, catering to different types of photographers.

