vsversusfinder

Canon RF100- vs Tamron 28-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on weight and zoom range, Tamron 28- wins on length.

The Canon RF100-500mm offers superior optical performance and build quality, while the Tamron 28-75mm is a more affordable and versatile option for everyday use.

Why Canon RF100- is better

Optical Quality

Canon has advanced lens design with superior resolving power.

Build Quality

Canon features robust L-series construction for extreme conditions.

Focal Range

Canon offers a longer zoom range for diverse photography.

Why Tamron 28- is better

Price

Tamron is significantly more affordable.

Weight

Tamron is lighter and more compact.

Close-ups

Tamron has a shorter minimum focusing distance for macro shots.

Overall score

Canon RF100-
90
Tamron 28-
75

Specifications

SpecCanon RF100-Tamron 28-
Max ApertureF4.5-7.1F2.8
Min Focus Dist.3.0 ft7.1 in
Image StabilizationYesNo
Autofocus TypeDual Nano USMVXD Linear Motor
Warranty1 Year6 Years

Dimension comparison

Canon RF100-Tamron 28-

Overview of the Canon RF100-500mm and Tamron 28-75mm

The Canon RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L is USM Lens is a super-telephoto zoom lens designed for Canon's EOS R series mirrorless cameras, while the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 is a versatile standard zoom lens tailored for Nikon Z mount mirrorless cameras. The Canon lens is priced at $2,898.95, making it a premium choice for photographers who require extensive zoom capabilities. In contrast, the Tamron lens is significantly cheaper at $749.00, appealing to those looking for a quality everyday lens without breaking the bank.

Design and Build Quality

The Canon RF100-500mm features a robust L-series construction, offering dust and weather resistance, which is essential for outdoor photography. Its compact size and lightweight design make it travel-friendly, despite its long focal range. On the other hand, the Tamron 28-75mm is compact at just 4.7 inches long and weighs 19.4 ounces, making it easily portable. It also boasts moisture-resistant construction and a fluorine coating for added durability. While both lenses are built to withstand challenging conditions, the Canon’s superior build quality is particularly suited for extreme environments.

Optical Performance

When it comes to optical performance, the Canon RF100-500mm excels with its advanced design featuring one Super UD and six UD lenses, ensuring brilliant resolving power across a variety of shooting conditions. The lens also incorporates a built-in, three-mode optical image stabilization system, which provides up to 5 stops of shake correction. Comparatively, the Tamron 28-75mm offers a fast maximum aperture of F/2.8 throughout its zoom range, which is beneficial for low-light conditions and achieving a shallow depth of field. Although both lenses deliver impressive optical quality, the Canon's longer focal range allows for more creative flexibility in various photographic scenarios.

Autofocus Capabilities

The Canon RF100-500mm is equipped with a high-speed, smooth, and quiet autofocus system powered by Dual Nano USM technology. This makes it an excellent choice for capturing fast-moving subjects in wildlife or sports photography. Conversely, the Tamron 28-75mm features a fast and quiet VXD linear motor, providing high-speed and high-precision autofocus as well. While both lenses excel in autofocus performance, the Canon's advanced system may offer an edge in more demanding situations due to its superior speed and accuracy over longer distances.

Minimum Focusing Distance

The Canon lens has a minimum focusing distance of 3.0 feet, which is adequate for general photography. However, the Tamron 28-75mm stands out with a minimum object distance of just 7.1 inches at its wide end, allowing for creative close-up photography with a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2.7. This feature makes the Tamron particularly appealing for those who enjoy macro or detail-focused photography, providing a level of versatility that the Canon lens does not match in terms of close-up capabilities.

Price Consideration

The price difference between these two lenses is substantial. The Canon RF100-500mm is priced at $2,898.95, while the Tamron 28-75mm costs only $749.00. This means the Canon lens is approximately 287% more expensive than the Tamron. For photographers on a budget or those who are starting out, the Tamron offers an excellent balance of quality and affordability. However, professionals or serious enthusiasts may justify the higher price of the Canon lens for its advanced features and superior performance.

Use Cases

The Canon RF100-500mm is ideal for sports, wildlife, and aviation photography due to its extensive zoom range, making it a favorite among professional photographers. The lens's ability to capture distant subjects with clarity and detail is unmatched, making it perfect for those who require high performance in the field. In contrast, the Tamron 28-75mm is designed as an everyday lens, suitable for portrait, landscape, and general photography. Its versatility and compact size make it a great option for casual photographers and videographers alike.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF100-500mm and the Tamron 28-75mm depends largely on your specific needs and budget. If you require a high-performance lens for specialized photography such as wildlife or sports, and you have the budget for it, the Canon is worth the investment for its superior optical quality and advanced features. However, if you are looking for a versatile, cost-effective lens for everyday use, the Tamron 28-75mm is an excellent choice that offers great value without compromising on quality. Ultimately, both lenses cater to different types of photographers, making your choice a reflection of your photographic style and requirements.