Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal vs Shure SM-57 Cardioid Dynamic Instrument Microphone
Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal wins on sound and isolation, Shure SM-57 Cardioid Dynamic Instrument Microphone wins on price and versatility.
The Electro-Voice ND86 excels in vocal performance and sound quality, while the Shure SM-57 offers versatility and affordability.
Why Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal is better
Sound Quality
ND86 delivers superior sound for vocals.
Acoustic Isolation
ND86 provides better noise isolation.
Build Quality
ND86 has enhanced handling noise reduction.
Why Shure SM-57 Cardioid Dynamic Instrument Microphone is better
Price
SM-57 is significantly cheaper.
Versatility
SM-57 works well for instruments too.
Popularity
SM-57 has a higher sales rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal | Shure SM-57 Cardioid Dynamic Instrument Microphone |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Pattern | Supercardioid | Cardioid |
| Frequency Response | 50-20k Hz | 40-15k Hz |
| Weight | 0.5 lbs | 0.5 lbs |
| Price | $144.00 | $98.00 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Electro-Voice ND86 and Shure SM-57
The Electro-Voice ND86 is priced at $144.00, while the Shure SM-57 is considerably cheaper at $98.00, making it about 32% less expensive. Each microphone serves distinct purposes, tailored for different audio applications. The ND86 is designed primarily for vocal performances with its large-diaphragm dynamic supercardioid design, while the SM-57 excels as an instrument microphone. Understanding these differences can help users make an informed choice based on their specific needs.
Design and Build Quality
The Electro-Voice ND86 features a robust and durable design with a tight-mesh Memraflex grille that resists denting and withstands rough handling. This makes it suitable for various environments, especially live performances in large venues. On the other hand, the Shure SM-57 also boasts a solid build, known for its reliability and longevity. Both microphones are designed to endure the rigors of frequent use, but the ND86's additional features, like its shock-mounted capsule, offer enhanced handling noise reduction, which might be crucial in live settings.
Sound Quality
Sound quality is where the Electro-Voice ND86 shines, delivering a present, smooth, and detailed sound that is well-suited for vocal performances. Its large-diaphragm design ensures a rich frequency response, providing excellent acoustic control. In contrast, the Shure SM-57 is designed with a contoured frequency response that is excellent for both amplified and acoustic instruments, making it versatile for various applications. While both microphones offer quality sound, the ND86 is specifically tailored for vocals, whereas the SM-57 is more neutral, catering to a broader range of sound sources.
Acoustic Isolation
When it comes to acoustic isolation, the Electro-Voice ND86 excels with its supercardioid pattern, which provides superior isolation from ambient noise on stage. This feature is particularly beneficial in live environments, as it minimizes feedback and background noise. The Shure SM-57, with its cardioid pickup pattern, also offers decent isolation but may not match the ND86's capability in high-noise situations. For performers who require clarity and focus in their vocals, the ND86 presents a clear advantage.
Versatility in Use
The Shure SM-57 is known for its versatility, often used for capturing not only vocals but also a variety of instruments, including drums and guitars. Its design caters to both live and studio settings, making it a go-to choice for many sound engineers. In contrast, while the Electro-Voice ND86 is primarily focused on vocal performance, it may not be as versatile as the SM-57 for instrument applications. Users should consider their primary use when selecting between these two microphones.
Price and Value
The price difference between the Electro-Voice ND86 and the Shure SM-57 is significant, with the ND86 at $144.00 and the SM-57 at $98.00. This makes the SM-57 approximately 32% cheaper. For those on a budget or seeking a microphone primarily for instruments, the SM-57 offers a more economical choice. However, the ND86's higher price reflects its specialized design for vocal clarity and handling noise reduction, which may justify the investment for professional vocalists.
Sales and Popularity
In terms of sales rank, the Shure SM-57 is more popular, holding a rank of 8727 compared to the Electro-Voice ND86's rank of 44080. This suggests that the SM-57 is favored by more consumers, likely due to its versatility and price point. The popularity of the SM-57 in both live and studio settings showcases its reliability and performance across various audio applications, making it a staple in many professionals' gear.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Electro-Voice ND86 and the Shure SM-57 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you're a vocalist seeking high-quality sound with excellent acoustic isolation, the ND86 is worth the investment. However, if you require a versatile microphone that can handle both vocals and instruments at a lower price point, the Shure SM-57 is an outstanding choice. Consider your primary application, budget, and desired sound quality to make the best decision for your audio needs.

