vsversusfinder

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Shure BETA 52A Kick Drum Microphone with Compact

Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone leads on versatility and sound quality.

The Electro-Voice RE320 offers greater versatility for various applications, while the Shure BETA 52A excels specifically in kick drum performance.

Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better

Versatility

Can handle various instruments and vocals.

Features

Includes a dual personality EQ switch.

Durability

Robust design for multiple applications.

Why Shure BETA 52A Kick Drum Microphone with Compact is better

Specialization

Optimized for kick drums.

Price

More budget-friendly option.

Setup

Includes a built-in locking stand adapter.

Overall score

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
85
Shure BETA 52A Kick Drum Microphone with Compact
78

Specifications

SpecElectro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneShure BETA 52A Kick Drum Microphone with Compact
TypeDynamicDynamic
PatternCardioidSupercardioid
Frequency Response20Hz-18kHz20Hz-10kHz
Weight1.5 lbs1.2 lbs
EQ SwitchYesNo

Dimension comparison

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneShure BETA 52A Kick Drum Microphone with Compact

Introduction to the Electro-Voice RE320 and Shure BETA 52A

When comparing professional microphones, the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Shure BETA 52A stand out as two top contenders in the studio microphone category. With the RE320 priced at $315.00 and the BETA 52A at $261.99, the latter is about 17% cheaper. Despite their price difference, both microphones offer unique features tailored to specific applications, making them suitable for different recording needs.

Design and Build Quality

The Electro-Voice RE320 boasts a robust design, tailored for dynamic broadcasting and recording. It features a durable construction that minimizes wear and tear, ensuring longevity in both studio and live settings. On the other hand, the Shure BETA 52A is also built to last, featuring a hardened steel mesh grille that withstands the rigors of touring. It comes with a compact base stand that simplifies setup and provides stability. Both microphones are designed with professional use in mind, but the RE320’s emphasis on versatility gives it an edge for various applications beyond kick drums.

Sound Quality and Performance

While both microphones excel in sound quality, they cater to different needs. The Electro-Voice RE320 is acclaimed for its dual personality frequency response switch, allowing for flat response or tailored kick drum EQ. This feature enables it to deliver punchy sounds ideal for vocals, guitar amps, and drums. Conversely, the Shure BETA 52A is engineered specifically for kick drums and bass instruments, delivering exceptional low-end clarity and precision. Its tailored frequency response emphasizes punchy lows, making it perfect for bass-heavy genres. This distinction makes the RE320 versatile, while the BETA 52A specializes in kick drum performance.

Features and Functionality

The RE320 offers a two-position EQ switch that enhances its functionality for various instruments, while its integrated humbucking coil minimizes unwanted noise. This versatility makes it suitable for a range of recording scenarios. The Shure BETA 52A, however, features a built-in dynamic locking stand adapter for effortless setup and an advanced pneumatic shock mount to reduce mechanical vibrations. It also has a supercardioid polar pattern that provides excellent feedback rejection, which is vital in live performance settings. The BETA 52A is equipped with features that enhance its usability specifically for kick drums, while the RE320 excels in its flexibility across multiple applications.

Target Audience

The Electro-Voice RE320 appeals to a broader audience, including musicians and sound engineers looking for a versatile microphone that can handle various instruments and vocal applications. Its adaptability makes it a suitable choice for those who require a multi-purpose microphone. In contrast, the Shure BETA 52A is targeted primarily at drummers and live performers who need a microphone specifically tailored for kick drums. Its specialized design and features cater to bass-heavy music styles, making it an essential tool for professionals in that niche.

Price Comparison

At $315.00, the Electro-Voice RE320 is positioned at the higher end of the market, suggesting a premium product aimed at serious audio professionals. The Shure BETA 52A, priced at $261.99, offers a more budget-friendly option without compromising on quality. The approximately $53 price difference may be significant for those on a tighter budget, making the BETA 52A an attractive choice for beginners or those focused solely on kick drum performance.

Sales Performance

In terms of sales rank, the Electro-Voice RE320 is currently positioned at 76,619, while the Shure BETA 52A ranks at 78,329. Although both microphones are popular, the RE320 has a slight edge in terms of sales performance. This suggests that it may have a broader appeal among users, likely due to its versatility and reputation in the industry. However, the BETA 52A’s solid sales performance indicates that it is also a trusted choice among professionals focused on kick drum applications.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Shure BETA 52A ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you are looking for a versatile microphone that can deliver exceptional performance across various instruments and vocals, the RE320 is worth the investment. However, if your primary focus is on capturing the best sound from kick drums and bass instruments, the BETA 52A, with its specialized design and lower price point, offers excellent value. Consider your recording environment and requirements to make the best choice for your audio needs.